Big Hero 6 (8/10)
This film is good. Really good. Considering that this was Disney's first attempt at a superhero film, in a genre that's saturated, and dominated by Marvel properties at that, it's frankly astounding that it's as good as it is. It's actually kind of frustrating that this movie isn't even better because it stumbles, IMO, in some key ways.
So, basically, if BH6 has a core theme/motif, it's the idea of dealing with grief, being able to move on, and arguably, the question of legacy. We see this in various characters, such as Hiro losing his brother, and Callaghan his daughter. Both lose their brother/daughter in an accident, and the motif is clear, that Callaghan is what Hiro could be if he allowed himself to be consumed with grief, and gave in to anger. I mean, yeah, sure, that's a well-worn trope, but it's a trope that's handled excellently, namely in the film's quieter moments, with Hiro suffering from depression, and later, before finally breaking down in front of Baymax, who shows him recordings of his brother. However, it drops the ball in that Callaghan's actions arguably works. He reconstructs the teleporter as part of his effort to get revenge on Krei, and yet, by doing so, that allows Hiro to go in, save his daughter, and, well...
Yeah, it doesn't really reflect well on the idea of moving on/not giving in to grief when Callaghan's inability to do so is what allows his daughter to return, however indirectly. Similarly, with Baymax. Yes, it's a tear-jerker, with Baymax and Hiro parting ways, but he's not really dead, and Hiro can construct a new body for Baymax's chip at the end. So, Callaghan gets his daughter back, Hiro gets his friend back, and, um...what was this about the themes of grief and loss? Because at the end of the day, only Takashi is the one that's still gone forever. I don't think this ruins the idea of the themes per se, but the more I think about it, the more I'm bugged by how the film kind of chickens out.
That said, the route to getting there is good, though part of what stops this from being an excellent film is that the superhero stuff is the least interesting stuff to me here. You could easily have had a slower, quieter, more introspective movie here, of the themes I mentioned above, but with less action, and more character development. This isn't a fault with the film per se, I mean, it's clearly advertised as a superhero film, but even so, character development and theme is more important to be than action. At least here, with the former two being as strong as they are.
Anyway, to list off some other stuff:
-I really like the aesthetic of San Fransokyo, but the film does nothing to explain why the city is the way it is. From what I've read, it's a case of San Francisco being destroyed by an earthquake, and Japanese migrants helping to rebuild it, hence the cultural fusion thing (I'm sure there's some people in the corners of the Internet that screamed cultural appropriation when this film came out), but if that's the case, the film doesn't explain any of it.
-I really like the STEM part of the film. Not just because I'm kind of a sucker for that stuff (even if I don't have a technical bone in my body), but that all of the devices of the main characters feel like they have at least one foot in reality. As in, lasers using magnetic containment, or Honey Lemon's satchel using the periodic table...yeah, it's far-fetched, but arguably more down to Earth than, say, Tony Stark whipping out elements for plot convenience. The geek/STEM stuff is part of why I feel this film could have been even better as a drama piece.
-All of the said Six are...well, maybe not developed, but all have defined personality traits, so that works. All are pleasent to be around. That said, what's up with Fred? He's clearly the odd one out, and his 'thing' is that he's...um...genre savy? Yeah, I don't really know why Fred is here, and I was expecting that to come up as a plot point, that he's the only member of the team who isn't a tech genius, but it never comes up.