Ghost of Tsushima is the best Assassin's Creed game ever made. That is all.
I haven't played it but I can see exactly what you mean from what I've seen. Hell, just watching some of the footage, one of the first things that came to mind watching it was "This is the Japanese AC that Ubisoft refused to make. There's no point in them even attempting to now".Ghost of Tsushima is the best Assassin's Creed game ever made. That is all.
Ironically I never liked the AC series until they moves away from their original premise and started playing with the fantastical.snip
Which is weird, because they've done an AC game in China, but apparently Japan is impossible. According to Ubisoft. Yes, it was a 2.5 D spin-off, but if they could have done it there, they could have done japan. I'm glad they didn't, because it would have been even more convolutely with the stupid conspiracy stuff.I can see exactly what you mean from what I've seen. Hell, just watching some of the footage, one of the first things that came to mind watching it was "This is the Japanese AC that Ubisoft refused to make. There's no point in them even attempting to now".
I didn't even know people were asking for it. It sounds really stupid and pointless. I don't care for the Red Dead series, but they already accomplished more than whatever an AC game can do with that concept.Every so often I see someone suggest they do a WIld West Assassin's Creed game and all I can think is "Why? Red Dead Redemption is already a thing and arguably much better to boot".
It's funny because they introduced the Chinese Assassin back around the time 3 came out(in a short movie, Embers, but she's mentioned 3 as well) but couldn't be bothered to put in her a mainline game, and Japan is apparently right out or something.Which is weird, because they've done an AC game in China, but apparently Japan is impossible. According to Ubisoft. Yes, it was a 2.5 D spin-off, but if they could have done it there, they could have done japan. I'm glad they didn't, because it would have been even more convolutely with the stupid conspiracy stuff.
I didn't even know people were asking for it. It sounds really stupid and pointless. I don't care for the Red Dead series, but they already accomplished more than whatever an AC game can do with that concept.
Western is not exactly known for having tall building to climb over...It's funny because they introduced the Chinese Assassin back around the time 3 came out(in a short movie, Embers, but she's mentioned 3 as well) but couldn't be bothered to put in her a mainline game, and Japan is apparently right out or something.
And I occasionally see the Western thing come up in lists of "possible AC settings" but I don't know why anyone thinks it would work.
Granted 3 also didnt have much in the way of tall buildings and....yeah,I'll get to 3 soon enough, actually.Western is not exactly known for having tall building to climb over...
I think its more a case that people take any historical setting and throw it at AC. I think they'd be better served by trying somewhat more obscure setting, maybe Babylon, or a south east asia version of black flag. Ancient china would definitely work, but then the game might be banned in china so I doubt they'd do it. Don't know enough about Mayan/Inca to be able to say but that could be cool, with lots of mountain region.
Definitely agree that ghost of tsushima killed any chance of AC:ninja, which was such an obvious setting that ubisoft apparently couldn't figure it out?
Regarding Metal Gear, part of the reason I’m willing to cut Kojima’s storytelling a bit more slack than usual, is that while his stylized eccentricities often bleed too much into the weighty political themes at times, his intent is commendable in itself. The MGS4 Database serves as a prime example of how well his creative side can be woven into the historical context of it all. Unfortunately as I’ve often said, there’s a feeling that too much of his messaging gets lost in translation, and the gamey side of the presentation winds up taking precedence and makes it all too easy to dismiss.It's interesting to see someone criticize the overarching story of AC in some length because... well, there's a lot of it and I get the impression most have given up on trying to follow it a while ago. I'm saying that as someone who only very sporadically plays any games in the series but the impression that I get is that it was originally meant to be wrapped up in a trilogy and once they decided to extend the series beyond AC3 they just sorta started playing it by ear. I am absolutely ready to believe that the series lore has gotten Kingdom Hearts levels of convoluted and aimless by now. The thing about that series is: There are a lot of games over a lot of different platforms and, as is the case with a lot of Ubisoft's series, if you want to play every single game in it, you are likely to get burnt out sooner or later. See, the last AC I've played was Odyssey. And it's not that it's a bad game or anything. But it is overwhelmingly long for how little variety in gameplay it has. So you've got this 70 hours game where the gameplay doesn't really evolve or change up much throughout the entire game. And then that game is technically the middle part of a sub trilogy consisting of it, Origins and Valhalla and then there are two other games that have basically that gameplay which last respectively another 70 hours each. I don't think anyone beyond a very small hardcore fanbase is ready to commit to that. Especially considering that I don't think AC has that kind of ride or die fandom something like Metal Gear or Kingdom Hearts or even Resident Evil has, where people genuinely lap up every little piece of lore, just to see where it's all going. Mainly because I think Kojima and Nomura, writing by the seat of their pants as they are, do seem to have some greater plans worked out.
And because the marketing department was probably very firm on the stance that Connor had to join the Patriots.Connor very pointedly has a lot to say about his hypocrisy among the rebels and really the only reason he backs the Patriots is his belief the Templars back the British
Depends. Right Wingers see US Independence as something akin to a Holy fucking event, on par with the coming of Christ, but from a Patriotic angle, which is one of the reasons you have massive anger about stuff like the 1691 project which highlights the role of Slavery in our Early History(and not in a good way). The rest of us....yeah, we're a bit more mixed on the whole thing.AC3 is the first one I skipped, I thing the main reason is that I didn't really care for the setting. It was obvious they were going to airbrush over most of the controversial stuff. I don't know how US people see the US independence stuff but from the outside it doesn't look glorious, declaring independence because you don't want your tea taxed after England funded the colonization for years is quite petty. But part of it was also revelation being less than stellar and all the report of AC3 being rushed and buggy.
I don't really know how ubisoft was structured back then, but was it really necessery to have a new AC almost every year? The quality suffered and you just hit player fatigue.