Inspired from a post on another thread(In the Current Events section), I posted a spoiler about Bioshock and got called on it. I marked it spoilers out of courtesy but I honestly didn't think a 15 year old game(which is fairly well known) really warranted spoiler warnings at this point.
Which begs the question: At what point should it be fair not to mark spoilers for vital plot points in a video game, especially ones that are meant to be a twist of some sort? One can argue that after a certain point you would have played a game or else you're probably not interested but OTOH there's about 10 bizillion video games out there and nobody can play them all. Also the fact that someone may not become interested in a series or game for a long time and this were more or less unaware of it's big reveals(and also wants to remain unspoiled). LIke I didn't play Dragon Age until THIS YEAR despite the most recent game being 8 years old at this point but it was nice not knowing every twist and turn(though some of the big ones I already knew, such as the big event DA2).
Which begs the question: At what point should it be fair not to mark spoilers for vital plot points in a video game, especially ones that are meant to be a twist of some sort? One can argue that after a certain point you would have played a game or else you're probably not interested but OTOH there's about 10 bizillion video games out there and nobody can play them all. Also the fact that someone may not become interested in a series or game for a long time and this were more or less unaware of it's big reveals(and also wants to remain unspoiled). LIke I didn't play Dragon Age until THIS YEAR despite the most recent game being 8 years old at this point but it was nice not knowing every twist and turn(though some of the big ones I already knew, such as the big event DA2).