...that was not an argument in favour. It was simply to point out its achievable.
Those rates could be lower or higher than the US's. If they're lower, then foreign investors are advantaged, no?
And?
...and that directly addresses what you said. You said "why would X happen". I told you.
It's not necessary to disadvantage them at all.
It's because he doesn't want answers. He wants blind agreement on how unfair it is that the world doesn't revolve around him.
He's such a genius that he doesn't even consider buying D&D from Hasbro. He'd just like to buy Hasbro. All to satiate his ego.
Hasbro has been a terrible owner for WOTC and have forced multiple games to make stupid changes for a few extra dollar bucks
Oh, no argument here. But yeah, if someone were to write up an "even worse person or business" list, Musk would be high up on it.
Or anything. The Red Dwarf quote "I wouldn't trust you to open a can of beans that was already open." comes to mind.
Or, to paraphrase a Gordon Ramsey quote: "I wouldn't trust that guy to run a bath, let alone a business."
Why would something that's always been done X way just randomly change? You simply said because it could. Yes, it could but it won't. Again, you can give that answer for anything. Why would someone that's has addiction problems to whatever just stop having said problems? And you would say because they could like that's an answer.
We're not discussing what will happen. We're discussing our preferred approaches.
If the detriment is so small, and the benefit is so large, it could be worthwhile.
No, we weren't discussing preferred approaches.
www.newsx.com
Are you claiming that no country has ever made any policy that was detrimental to its citizens?
