Recent content by fepayton

So many thanks to you both. You have managed to articulate so clearly, the confusion of misery of, all too familiar, cycels. Amazing work. All the best!

I feel that people are judging motion controls as one would judge apples to bananas. I feel that they are advertised as bananas when they are not, and I feel this is where their criticism stems from. To be blunt, I don't believe that much time has been invested into what motion controls are...

If there is a problem with melee games, it is interface. Consider an FPS: Point and shoot almost intuitively becomes point and click. The game has simplified actual gun combat into easy to master, but still realistic controls. For example: walking is smooth and we never trip over stuff...

The more I think about this, the more I both like and loath the design. I think of of possessions of each player: - Their Own Identity, and the identity of the person they need to meet. - Their Position on the board. - The identity and position of all opponents that they have met. From...

gooneybird71 quote: No computer game ever made will endure in that way because of the technology required to play them. Computer games require allot. They need rare earths, raw materials, a system of power and to be shielded from conductive materials and water. They are not as simple...

skMerker quote: "fepayton: I believe go is more often played on a 19 by 19 board. When I was shopping for a set last year I never even saw a 13 by 13 board." Good call, it is usually 19 x 19. Oddly enough, a quick Wikipedia search revealed that the original was 17x17. Being an...

Quote 1: Can you make an AI-free, randomness-free, physical-challenge-free, single-player game with gameplay depth akin to that of Go? Quote 2: Go is often cited as a touchstone for profoundly deep gameplay that emerges from a shockingly simple set of basic game mechanics. You can learn the...