Recent content by Georgeman

Take a look here. [http://news.vgchartz.com/news.php?id=6572]

Even if what you say is true (and I have a hunch that it is considering that I didn't see the dude on the trailer executing the super move by turning the "joystick" around), I still can't imagine executing jumping low-to-high combos easy. It will be a dumbed-down version of the game no matter...

It still would be pointless in my opinion. I can understand the remake for Final Fantasy III. It was a game that was not released on the West. But I kept scratching my head over the announcement of Final Fantasy IV DS. I mean, it was just 1 year ago that Final Fantasy IV had been re-released on...

I see, Guitar Hero 5 has underperformed, so you'd like the extra sales from Rock Band, right Kottick? Too bad, but it really won't work. Thanks to your stupidity over applying the "over-saturation" method, people have grown tired of your games.

I shudder to think how in the name of Hell will you be able to do all these fancy combos complete with the super moves in a fucking touchscreen. No, just no.

No remakes please. Final Fantasy VI was re-released just 3 years ago on the Gameboy Advance. And yes, it's true that it can be difficult tracking down this version. For those who really want to see what the greatness is all about, might I recommend instead that Square just release it on...

I always find it extremely amusing when Sony and Microsoft give jabs to each other and start making a dick-waving competition to see whose penis grew larger (or not) by how many nanometres every once in a while.

What is a man? A miserable little pile of sh... Oh Snap! I don't know how it got to me!

Yeah, because reviews are affecting sales. Totally. Oh wait, no they don't. Seriously, who gives a shit if your game had an average metacritic score of 50 and sold millions? Who the hell are you selling these games to anyway? Game critics?

Goodbye Ubisoft. Good fucking riddance! If you don't want to develop games for the PC, then go ahead and FUCKING say it. Don't go into all this stupid trouble to develop crappy PC ports that none will buy. You will be doing nothing more than wasting your limited time and money. I'm also a bit...

"Oh my god, we are bleeding!!! What can we do about this?! Oh yes, let's make the gamer-owned game our own property! And while we are at it, let's also prohibit him from playing the game the way he wants it! Oh my god, I am so genius! I'll be so rich!" Goodbye Game Industry. It was hilarious...

I do. I own many games and keep on buying more even though I'm not done with lots of my other games. I have two reasons for this: 1) Many of them end up dead cheap (Less than 20 bucks!) and are thus a great opportunity. 2) I'm a bit paranoid that if I don't buy a game within a year of its...

Easier than Kirby's Adventure? o_0 Sorry, but I find that hard to believe.

Yeah, about Lost Levels... I think it's a bad game actually because it reminds me so much of a romhack. In Super Mario Bros, you could at least attempt to avoid a dangerous jump/situation, etc by going in an alternative route. In Lost Levels... you gotta play by the rules... and the rules want...

Oh yes, because some text will OBVIOUSLY prevent children from doing such acts. It would be much more effective if they went out to streets and start burning their cash in front of the children. Besides, children want to play a game to have fun, not to be educated. They have books for that.