Recent content by God of Path

Very nice reply! Having seen the film, all I can add is that I thought the film covered Turing's persecution for being homosexual (and subsequent likely suicide) enough that it had a lasting impact, though it is completely true that film could have been more explicit in showing these things on...

Perhaps it might behoove one to watch a film before making so brash an accusation. See:

Quite to the contrary, I feel Cumberbatch gave a startlingly accurate portrayal of what it's like to have (what's commonly called) Asperger's. In fact, his portrayal grasped many of the most common issues associated with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), the extremely concrete thinking, the...

I, too, played as Mitt Romney in the Saints Row games.

I don't think he meant to imply that the Charlie Hebdo staff/cartoons are racist, only that it's possible both to see them as good satire and also as an unfortunate jab at underprivileged peoples; that they aren't quite so irreproachable as we seem to be making them out to be.

[obligatory comment requesting 'MOAR ANDY']

Is it just me or does this seem a lot like some of the tactics that trey parker and matt stone use in their feature length stuff?

There's starcraft in the opening scrawl for the show, so I will continue to hope for a grande finale tiebreak in Starcraft 2.

Does not-Navi have tiny, voluptuous, water-ripple-enhanced breasts?

I can't imagine how difficult it might be for Team Ninja designing a Zelda game to NOT give Link gorgeous, voluptuous (water-balloon-jiggle-enhanced) breasts.

I know that the SC2 HotS into cinematic was used probably mostly because it looks cool, but I'd love to see Jim and Yahtzee go up against one another in Starcraft!

Here's a TV that looks like an apple! http://youtu.be/NeEbtz55XYI?t=1m22s

I misunderstood the purpose of your post, then. Thank you for clarification. However, while there is some anecdotal evidence of some disagreement "between [games journalism and its publishers] and their readers," it seems rash to make so certain a statement. That is, just how large is this...

Does an activity in minority make it any more acceptable? Does ethnic cleansing, for example, become OK if only a minority of the Earth's population takes part in it? What of murder? Only a small proportion of any given population ever actually murders anyone else. Does that mean that people...

what's your point? Perhaps an explicit statement might clear up some of the ambiguity left by your (assumptively) sarcastic remark.