Recent content by Iridium Dawn

Thank you! That is precisely something I've been trying to say. Except, said concisely. Not giving someone a forum to speak is not the same thing as censoring them. If it is, that is such a broad definition that the concept of censorship becomes meaningless.

Okay, a couple of responses. Sorry about the formatting and length, Father Time did a couple of posts and I can't make it pretty. I added a 1), 2), etc, before the things I want to address. Father Time, I think in general you and some others are appealing to some pretty abstract ideals of...

It does split the discussion, but that seems almost unavoidable. Youtube does allow for comment approval (though I think if she took that route people would still ***** about censorship), but it's also globally accessible. The first "Tropes vs Women" video got, what, 1 million+ views? If even...

Because it can create a false equivalency between the comments and the arguments being made in the video. It's why Neil deGrasse Tyson doesn't debate astrologers or Richard Dawkins doesn't debate creationists: putting some idiot like Ken Hamm on stage with Dawkins makes it seem like Hamm has...

Grey Carter, thanks for getting a thread going that's inspired me to de-lurk! Mr. F, while you're right that turning off the comments really didn't cost anyone anything of value, her academic qualifications are basically irrelevant. Ditto those of her critics, actually. Whether she has any...