You have like a giant thread dedicated to this stuff, this literally is nothing but I'm sad cause a friend wasn't nice to me. Why does this need it's own post?
I imagine they might own the audio (which she doesn't use) but the video I highly doubt, it's the equivalent of screen capping a movie and claiming you have rights to the footage because you screen capped. Unless you are going to argue that the act of manipulating the character to move via...
Again it's literally footage of a game, that's it. That's all. This is a non controversy blown up because it's Anita.
The fan art was by all accounts an accident and she removed it...
I really think that's the best way, find the outlets that serve your needs and I'll find mine and let the chips fall where they may vis a vis clicks or visits or whatever.
We (and by this I mean specifically you and I) may both end up benefiting.
Given that I showed that it;s hosted on AEI, has the AEI mark, promoted and hosted exclusively on AEI (CHS has no personal website or channel) and that the series has an FF team. Hell the damn videos all ask people to like us (as in AEI) on facebook and twitter and link back to AEI. This is an...
Yes it's part of the "Factual Feminist" series which is hosted and promoted through AEI. It is is not cross posted by AEI it is hosted by AEI. AEI is all over that series of videos.
http://www.aei.org/issue/society-and-culture/race-and-gender/factual-feminist/
Notice all the we...
Huh? The blame is on the hackers (which is what the post you quoted said) not the devs (which you pulled out of thin air) and certainly not the victims.
Because it's part of a series of videos that are all done as part of the AEI youtube channel? And the thing is promoted through the AEI website, and Hoff Sommers doesn't even have her own channel.
But I mean was that a serious question?
Uhhh, you know that video is literally hosted on said think tank's youtube page and has said think tank water mark on the video right?
Like it's part of her AEI work. Hardly "independent"
It was not admitted to be false, it was a case of dueling lawsuits and Brad won because the woman's risk of losing his suit was greater than winning hers.
You are not the majority, you are NOT the majority. You don't want to read those sites great don't read em but there are plenty who do and continue to do so (no site has really been hurt by your movement). It is an appalling goal to destroy those site that don't adhere to your viewpoint.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.