Recent content by NDWolfwood5268

Yes, well, this all seems rather rambling, but as Darwin said of the eye, the correct answer may not be readily apparent by 'looking at the world' around us. You seem like the sort that says 'science doesn't know everything' when it doesn't claim to. Of course there will be other theories...

^This.^ I would expect him to drive us into a totalitarian dictatorship where we toil all day for his amusement, but at least he'd be cracking jokes while we do, and video games would exist still.

I *heard* that some physicists thing that matter can, technically, arise from nothing. Physics is weird, note that some of them say that the Higgs Boson particle is coming back in time FROM THE FUTURE to destroy the Hadron Collider, like you going back in time to kill your grandpa as a teenager...

Console developers ALWAYS do until the later stages of the life cycle. Consoles are NOT meant to make a profit, they make the cash back my licensing games. Microsoft and Sony get cash for each title sold on their system, making the initial lost trivial. It's the same with cell phones: Apple...

I see it as this: if a person is violent, they will seek out violence. If a person is not violent, they would most likely see manhunt and the senseless violence in many games as childish and lean more towards the story elements USUALLY. I like to go on killing sprees in GTA to alleviate stress...

Scientology and Christians FTL.

No, I get what your saying, but what I mean is that, if you subscribe to creationism, all of what you just said, would not exist. You understand my argument perhaps best of all of these guys so far. The existence of genetics shows evidence towards evolution. These 'basic genetics' is what the...

I think I get what you're saying... I found it a bit unclear... The first bit you said about Adam and Eve is what I'm talking about. The second bit about how creationism counters evolution is also what I'm talking about. I'm saying that, if you follow the logic of creationism, the first part...

But whether they are beneficial or not is irrelevant, I mentioned this in a previous post. ANY change shows the POSSIBILITY for change meaning evidence towards evolution. And skin color IS beneficial. I also cited an abridged story about that. Light skin in the north and dark skin in the...

Yes, aka, EVIDENCE towards evolution. It shows an organism can adapt, albeit slightly. In this case VERY slightly. Those 'genetics' are what I'm referring to. It shows evidence towards evolution.

Ah, I see now. I only saw a subset of those as 'new' and others 'reworked'. They weren't my usual arsenal so I forgot about them. And I thought the Spiker was in 2, so I guess I am mixing games.

I'm not attacking you, I'm actually curious, what weapons? I know the vehicles, and I beat the game multiple times. I fear I am losing it... I honestly CANNOT recall lol.

I LOVE Halo 1, I liked Halo 2, I HATE Halo 3. Halo 1 was good. It had a good mystery-SciFi story mix. Fun times, good action, interesting people. It attracted a large fan base. Understandable. Halo 2 was a forced sequel in my book. It was good, but didn't live up to the hype. Better...

Well, I get you, but I must enforce that notion. If societies remained independent, we WOULD have sub-species of humanity. Evolution happens incredibly slowly. I propose that minor things like facial structure and skin color are NOT evolutionary differences, but they hint towards the...

Again you miss my point. If you find this offensive, that is due to your background with dealing with race, I mean no offense. My point: MINOR DIFFERENCES exist. Creationism doesn't account for this. I made this just for a light social debate, so don't think I'm trying to encourage racism or...