1. i think it is worth addressing as i want to know were you got your info
2. sexual selection is an evolutionary force which darwin wrote about o say its a helps creationists is just wrong
3. no it doesn't when they don't study long enough to get all the facts right
4. i said the peacock...
1. i like that you cited info but never said were it came from
2. i didn't realize that sexual selection was a view held by creationists you know since they tend to hate all methods of evolution
3. a century of good science didn't involve quite as extensive studies as the sexual selection ones...
well yes of course there are multiple pressures at work and the food reach is a plus its just that the main force was mate competition or sexual selection as darwin called if your going to invoke old C D. Its just that when looking at the evolutionary orgin of an adaptation one must make sure to...
i didn't say that they only eat from one source they do eat high leaves but not as often as lower ones, and just cause one scientist says something doesn't make it right, most modern scientist hold the neck as a weapon viewpoint
yeah well explain that to my evolution professor, while giraffes sometimes eat leaves from the top of the trees they mainly eat plants closer to the ground including during the dry season when leaves are harder to come by, on the other hand males who win in combat are more likely to mate and the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.