Recent content by StreakyMacintosh

Yes, exactly. There would have only been cause for ONE of them to walk off. No matter who got which role, one would have been happy, and one would have quit. That's why it doesn't makes sense that they BOTH declined.

"Originally the movie was meant to pit action heroes Jean-Claude Van Damme and Steven Seagal against one another. Both of them declined because neither one of them wanted to play the bad guy." Wait, what? If they were pitted against each other, one of them would have been the GOOD guy.