GRAND THEFT AUTO 6 OFFICIAL TRAILER (DECEMBER 2023)

Recommended Videos
Jun 11, 2023
4,227
2,930
118
Country
United States
Gender
Male

Strauss Zelnick talks about AI and general leadership strategy at 32:20.
 
Last edited:

Ezekiel

Elite Member
May 29, 2007
2,167
756
118
Country
United States
Why would the founders of Vice City call the city Vice? I know it's just a reference to Miami Vice (Miami Police), but no colonizers would want a name that implies evil/immorality.
 

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
4,316
4,149
118
Country
United States
Why would the founders of Vice City call the city Vice? I know it's just a reference to Miami Vice (Miami Police), but no colonizers would want a name that implies evil/immorality.
You mean like the township of Hell, Michigan?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

Ezekiel

Elite Member
May 29, 2007
2,167
756
118
Country
United States
You mean like the township of Hell, Michigan?
Theories:

The German Phrase Theory: It is suggested that German travelers passing through on a sunny day exclaimed "So schön hell!" (meaning "So beautifully bright"), which locals misheard or adapted into "Hell."
Reasonable. Not celebrating immorality.

The George Reeves Quote: When asked what to name the settlement, Reeves allegedly replied, "I don't care, you can name it Hell for all I care," a sentiment reflecting the difficult, swampy conditions early settlers faced.

Hellish Conditions: The name may have referred to the literal "hell-like" environment of thick forests, wetlands, and swarms of mosquitoes that early pioneers endured.
Reasonable. Not celebrating immorality. Celebrating perseverance.
 
Last edited:
Jun 11, 2023
4,227
2,930
118
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Why would the founders of Vice City call the city Vice? I know it's just a reference to Miami Vice (Miami Police), but no colonizers would want a name that implies evil/immorality.

Cause it’s from a videogame, and is it really much worse than the nickname a real city in Nevada wears like a badge of honor?
 

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
4,316
4,149
118
Country
United States
Cause it’s from a videogame, and is it really much worse than the nickname a real city in Nevada wears like a badge of honor?
You forget. If a video game or movie does ANYTHING that wouldn't happen in reality, it's automatically bad. And I'm sure City of Sin is actually referring to to the letter of the Hebrew alphabet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

Ezekiel

Elite Member
May 29, 2007
2,167
756
118
Country
United States

'If you were just a kid when Grand Theft Auto V dropped back in 2013, the current landscape of gaming media probably looks pretty normal to you. Maybe you are running a GTA fan community or an aggregate platform now, and you are getting ready for the next massive hype cycle. But if you think reviewing a Rockstar game is just about a critic sitting on their couch with an early copy and writing their honest thoughts, you are completely unprepared for how this company has actually handled the press for nearly twenty years. There is a deeply entrenched corporate playbook here that generations of gamers have completely forgotten, and it is the ultimate case study in how absolute perfection can be manufactured through sheer leverage.

'The illusion of the universal perfect score really perfected itself back in 2008 with the launch of Grand Theft Auto IV. On day one, the internet was hit with a tidal wave of flawless tens, but those scores were not just a spontaneous reaction to a great game. They were the result of an incredibly restrictive, high-pressure environment designed to eliminate dissent before it could even start. Rockstar pioneered the use of controlled review bootcamps, where journalists were flown out to specific locations and forced to marathon a massive forty-hour game under the watchful eyes of public relations representatives. Critics were isolated from peer feedback, trapped in an artificial echo chamber of pure hype, and bound by strict non-disclosure agreements that dictated exactly what they could and could not talk about.

'But the real corporate hardball happened behind closed doors when an outlet tried to give anything less than a perfect rating. If an editorial team decided that a game was a nine instead of a ten, it triggered an immediate, adversarial interrogation from the publisher. Public relations reps would demand a thorough, line-by-line justification for every single point deducted. Reviewers were forced to spend hours exhausting themselves defending their subjective experiences against corporate counter-arguments, arguing over sluggish vehicle handling or clunky cover mechanics. For an overworked editorial staff trying to meet a massive launch deadline, these exhausting debates became a massive deterrent.

'The implicit threat backing up those intense phone calls was always the total loss of access. If a publication stuck to their guns and ran a realistic score, they risked being blacklisted and frozen out of future review copies, DLC expansions, and developer interviews. For any gaming outlet relying on launch-day traffic to survive, losing that relationship was a financial death sentence. Faced with the prospect of an empty analytics dashboard, endless hours of PR pushback, and the wrath of an already hyper-fixated fanbase, many editors looked at their nuanced critiques and decided the fight simply was not worth the existential threat to their business. They rounded the score up to a perfect ten because it was the safest financial decision they could make, creating a legacy of pristine critical acclaim that completely insulated the publisher from reality.

'If you are expecting Grand Theft Auto VI to break this cycle, you are severely underestimating how much power Rockstar still holds. When the review embargo finally lifts for the next game, history is going to repeat itself, and you will see another massive wave of universal tens across the board. The corporate playbook that was perfected two decades ago is not going away. It is just going to be executed with even higher stakes, and the newer generation of fans running aggregate sites and community hubs are about to get a harsh lesson in how corporate narrative control actually works.

'Many creators running these independent GTA fan platforms mistakenly believe that if they grow their audience large enough and keep their content clean, they will eventually earn an invite to a Rockstar review event. But the harsh reality is that you will almost certainly be left out in the cold. A lot of people assume this exclusion is just a security measure to prevent early plot leaks or gameplay footage from slipping out, but that completely misreads the situation. Rockstar does not exclude fan platforms to protect the game from leaks. They exclude them because traditional security measures like non-disclosure agreements and watermarked builds already stop leaks. The exclusion is entirely about controlling the critical review narrative.

'An independent fan channel or a community platform is inherently unpredictable from a corporate public relations perspective. You do not have a corporate parent company, you do not have a multi-million dollar advertising relationship with the publisher, and you do not rely on a legacy media infrastructure to keep your business afloat. You answer directly to your audience. If an independent fan creator plays the game at an event and genuinely hates the new mission structure or finds the gameplay loop repetitive, they are highly likely to just say so to their community. They do not have an Editor-in-Chief breathing down their neck about a massive buyout ad campaign being pulled.

'Rockstar cannot easily apply their classic line-by-line exhaustion tactics to a self-made internet creator who does not care about corporate access. Therefore, the safest PR strategy is to completely eliminate that risk by ensuring only legacy media outlets and tightly vetted corporate partners get inside the room. By restricting early access to journalists who are fully aware of the financial consequences of a corporate blacklist, Rockstar guarantees an environment of maximum self-censorship. The review bootcamps for Grand Theft Auto VI will be an echo chamber of pure, manufactured hype, ensuring that the safest, most profitable score an outlet can publish is once again a perfect ten.'