I can see where you are coming from but why not give it a try first? I myself threw some money at Tim Schafer for his "Double Fine Adventure" project on Kickstarter. I am treating it like a donation because that is what it is. I am writing off that money as of now. Might I get something cool? Yes. Do I hope I do? YES. Am I ready for it to not pan out? Yep. As long as we keep that attitude I don't see a down side.Fr said:anc[is]Well said, but I am not as optimistic. This does not seem sustainable to me, as it runs entirely on hype, reputation, and nostalgia. Sure we could throw money at Beyond Good and Evil 2, System Shock 3, or anything else, but it does not guarantee it will be any good. Eventually one will flop, and I am afraid it will harm the entire concept of kickstarting games.
You speak as if the industry ran on something other than those nowadays.Fr said:anc[is]Well said, but I am not as optimistic. This does not seem sustainable to me, as it runs entirely on hype, reputation, and nostalgia.
Do you have any game from before the dominion of the First Person Shooter that never got a sequel but you wish it did?The Random One said:You speak as if the industry ran on something other than those nowadays.Fr said:anc[is]Well said, but I am not as optimistic. This does not seem sustainable to me, as it runs entirely on hype, reputation, and nostalgia.
The attitude that shooting Nazis and WW2 itself is mutually exclusive to innovation is exactly the kind of thing that stops companies from trying to prove you wrong. I've said it a thousand times and I'll say it again:Greg Tito said:They have told us time and again that we don't want originality and innovation, no no no, you want to shoot Nazis in WW2, again.