Syndicate Studio Lays Off 25

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
Syndicate Studio Lays Off 25


Starbreeze is marking the end of the long and arduous development of Syndicate by firing 25 people.

There aren't very many businesses I'm aware of that say "thanks for a job well done" with a handshake and a pink slip, but it's pretty much a staple of the mainstream videogame industry. The latest example is Swedish developer Starbreeze, which recently wrapped up development on the upcoming EA shooter Syndicate [http://www.amazon.com/Syndicate-Xbox-360/dp/B0050SY9WC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1329509292&sr=8-1], in the works since 2007, by giving the boot to 25 people.

"It is sad that we are forced to make staff cutbacks affecting employees," Starbreeze CEO Mikael Mermark said. "But we have to reduce staff after the final delivery of the Syndicate."

Peter Tornquist, who has served as the Chairman of the Board at Starbreeze since November 2007, is also leaving the company and will not be replaced.

It's a sad state of affairs, but this is the normal mode of operation for the game industry today: bulk up for a project, work people like dogs and then cut them loose. id Software wouldn't lay off employees [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/115165-id-Software-Suffers-Layoffs] following the launch of Star Wars: The Old Republic.

Anyway, enough negativity - Syndicate comes out on February 21 for the Xbox 360, PlayStation 3 and PC. We wish all the best to everyone who's been left unemployed as a result.

Source: GamesIndustry [http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2012-02-17-25-jobs-cut-at-starbreeze-following-syndicate-completion]


Permalink
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
And THIS should be the rallying argument to why we should stop pushing the technological envelope for a few years until we can catch up.
 

gideonkain

New member
Nov 12, 2010
525
0
0
This has become such a common headline it sickens me. Highly talented and creative individuals moving across the world to work on a game and then disposed of like garbage as soon as all their effort and talent has been raped to make the next bug ridden, DLC laden game.
 

Ninedeus

New member
Feb 26, 2010
98
0
0
So this is how they celebrate the completion of a game by laying off workers off the bat. I know its corporate practice but at least I do hope that they weren't chosen by random or lottery system and they were at least given early notice of the companies plans so they could at least send out their resumes before they're booted out.
 

evilneko

Fall in line!
Jun 16, 2011
2,218
49
53
Not just the games industry, it's how many businesses work. They take on more people for a project and let go most or all of them when it's done. Generally though, the temporary employees know they're temporary.
 

Podunk

New member
Dec 18, 2008
822
0
0
Hmm... On one hand, I really want Syndicate. On the other hand, should we as gamers be supporting practices and policies like this with our hard-earned dollars? I know the list of games we can play might be significantly shorter if limited in this way, but is this a practice that is beneficial in the long term to the game designer or the common gamer? It makes me wonder.
 

Antari

Music Slave
Nov 4, 2009
2,246
0
0
Podunk said:
Hmm... On one hand, I really want Syndicate. On the other hand, should we as gamers be supporting practices and policies like this with our hard-earned dollars? I know the list of games we can play might be significantly shorter if limited in this way, but is this a practice that is beneficial in the long term to the game designer or the common gamer? It makes me wonder.
Welcome to the right track! Yes there are somethings that you have to give up, but all in all being able to live with yourself is much more enjoyable.
 

Weaver

Overcaffeinated
Apr 28, 2008
8,977
0
0
Well, they had to pay skrillex millions of dollars to make their horrible soundtrack somehow.
 

Cowabungaa

New member
Feb 10, 2008
10,806
0
0
lacktheknack said:
And THIS should be the rallying argument to why we should stop pushing the technological envelope for a few years until we can catch up.
Not quite sure how these things are related to one another. This practice isn't even exclusive to the gaming industry, far from it actually.
 

Metalrocks

New member
Jan 15, 2009
2,406
0
0
who thinks that ?A told the CEO to fire these people? maybe bioware will be next and then dice.
 

Togusa09

New member
Apr 4, 2010
75
0
0
The part that I've started to get curious about recently is whether the bulk of these firings are of permenent salaried employees, or contractors hired to help out in the rush to finish, and then get let go afterwards, as they were expecting to happen?

I'm not saying this is the case when there's a studio closure, or half the devs are fired due to 'restructuring'. But it is true that you may need extra help towards the end of a project, which is why contractors are useful.
 

Waaghpowa

Needs more Dakka
Apr 13, 2010
3,073
0
0
Podunk said:
Hmm... On one hand, I really want Syndicate. On the other hand, should we as gamers be supporting practices and policies like this with our hard-earned dollars? I know the list of games we can play might be significantly shorter if limited in this way, but is this a practice that is beneficial in the long term to the game designer or the common gamer? It makes me wonder.
I for one decided not to support them when they omitted the PC demo of Syndicate for absolutely no reason at all despite my interest in the game. Also people in general are far to willing to overlook how corporations and companies treat their staff and customers it's sickening. Everyone could benefit from a little awareness on things like this and voice their opinions rather than sit back and say "Well it's not my problem".
praetor_alpha said:
Andy Chalk said:
... shortly before closing Kaos and handing the Homefront IP to Crytek.
WTF? When did that happen? That's the news right there.
Also I'm with this guy, what the fuck?
 

RagTagBand

New member
Jul 7, 2011
497
0
0
If they were only employed for the project it shouldn't be surprising that some people leave after that project is over, and chances are they'll find work elsewhere. The amount of developers that have come, gone, merged, split etc over the past 2 decades alone is fucking staggering. The games industry is in constant flux.

Honestly I see it more like Acting than anything else; You and your creative talents are hired for a job, if you're the cream of the fucking crop that company may desperately try to keep you around but otherwise its back to auditions.

C'est La Vi(d)e(o) games.
 

PotluckBrigand

No family dinner is safe.
Jul 30, 2008
210
0
0
evilneko said:
Not just the games industry, it's how many businesses work. They take on more people for a project and let go most or all of them when it's done. Generally though, the temporary employees know they're temporary.
Yeah articles like this can be a little misleading. It may very well have happened as it says, and that sucks for the 25 people who were let go, but there are always a certain number of employees who work by contract and don't retain their jobs after the project is done. If you think about it, it's always going to take more people to make a game than it will to support it, and if you don't have another project lined up for the studio when the current one is done, you can't afford to keep paying a bunch of people who are effectively doing nothing.

I have a buddy who works for (COMPANY NAME REDACTED) and he said anywhere between 25 and 40% of their employees are contracted at any given time, so when (TITLE RETRACTED) comes out, those guys are all going to leave having known full well the entire time that they would.

Again, though... this might not be the case with Starbreeze, and that totally sucks if this came as a surprise to them.

"There aren't very many businesses I'm aware of that say 'thanks for a job well done' with a handshake and a pink slip" - It's actually not terribly uncommon. Target did it to me when I was just out of High School. I worked there for the holiday season (Not supposed to be a temporary job) and when December was over, they said "You guys did a great job. We were really busy and you worked hard! But we can't afford you now that Christmas is over. This week is your last week," and my whole team was let go with less than seven days notice. It was also my birthday that day and I had moved out of my mom's house four days prior to being terminated. I can only hope that didn't happen to any of the members of the Syndicate team :X

Also:

AC10 said:
Well, they had to pay skrillex millions of dollars to make their horrible soundtrack somehow.
Is he really doing the soundtrack? Haha I hadn't heard that. I like that kid.
 

Nouw

New member
Mar 18, 2009
15,615
0
0
AC10 said:
Well, they had to pay skrillex millions of dollars to make their horrible soundtrack somehow.
Skrillex did its entire soundtrack? Hey Daft Punk, can I ask you guys something ;)?
 

octafish

New member
Apr 23, 2010
5,137
0
0
praetor_alpha said:
Andy Chalk said:
... shortly before closing Kaos and handing the Homefront IP to Crytek.
WTF? When did that happen? That's the news right there.
That happened about six months ago, you know when Kaos closed. It was reported. There was much fun to be had speculating how Homefront II would be a tight fun shooter with beautiful graphics and smart AI and then halfway through the aliens/mutants would appear and the game would go to shit.
 

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
praetor_alpha said:
Andy Chalk said:
... shortly before closing Kaos and handing the Homefront IP to Crytek.
WTF? When did that happen? That's the news right there.
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/113160-Crytek-Invades-Homefront-Sequel-Ousting-Kaos [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/113160-Crytek-Invades-Homefront-Sequel-Ousting-Kaos]