Developer Surprised by Anarchy Reigns Delay

The Wooster

King Snap
Jul 15, 2008
15,305
0
0
Developer Surprised by Anarchy Reigns Delay


Platinum Games found out about the delay of Anarchy Reigns the same way you did.

"First of all, we are done with all international versions of Anarchy Reigns. The delay is not due to further development on the game," tweeted [https://twitter.com/PG_inaba/status/214995228887744513] producer, Atsushi Inaba.

"Today's Q1 2013 release news was the first we'd heard of it. Even if we wanted to, we can't comment as we're (still) in the dark officially," he added. [https://twitter.com/PG_inaba/status/214995622628036608]

Sega announced the title's delay yesterday. Like many of the games demoed at this year's E3, it's being pushed back to the incredibly crowded first quarter 2013 release window. The Japanese version of the game, entitled Max Anarchy is still set to launch on July 5th. This is the second time the game's western release has been delayed.

So if the game is effectively finished, why on earth would Sega even consider pushing the game back to Q1 2013, where it will have to compete with a ton of top-tier titles including Tomb Raider and Bioshock Infinite? Inaba made it clear that no extra content was being added to the Western release.

Source: Twitter [https://twitter.com/PG_inaba/status/214995622628036608] via GameIndustryBiz




Permalink
 

CJ1145

Elite Member
Jan 6, 2009
4,051
0
41
It's simple: we kill the Batman. they simply are overestimating their own game, and underestimating their own stupidity. That, or the devs secretly hate this project and want it to flop, and this is the most obvious way to bring that about.
 

Evilsanta

New member
Apr 12, 2010
1,933
0
0
Sega WTF?! I have been waiting like mad for this.

And I would have bought on 1st day release too!

ARGH!
 

LazyAza

New member
May 28, 2008
716
0
0
Seems real weird to me, I think the same thing happened with Bayonetta too. For some reason Sega just wanted to artificially delay release. I mean I have almost NOTHING to play right now except Diablo 3 and I'm even getting pretty tired of that 120+ hours in and I have 500 bucks to spare, I'm almost willing to buy just about any game right now. Sega, you so silly.
 

JediVash

New member
Nov 7, 2010
10
0
0
LazyAza said:
Seems real weird to me, I think the same thing happened with Bayonetta too. For some reason Sega just wanted to artificially delay release. I mean I have almost NOTHING to play right now except Diablo 3 and I'm even getting pretty tired of that 120+ hours in and I have 500 bucks to spare, I'm almost willing to buy just about any game right now. Sega, you so silly.
I know right? so few games compared to last year, I'm basically alternating between Battlefield 3, Dota 2 and Mount & Blade
 

Tanis

The Last Albino
Aug 30, 2010
5,264
0
0
If devs were SMART they wouldn't release so many games during the Nov-Jan month.

They'd at least TRY and release some major titles throughout the year.

But, hey, this is the SAME industry that's getting away with putting out half-made, bug ridden, garbage and then patching them (if we're lucky) a few months later.

Seriously?
FUCK-THIS-GEN

>_>
 

WickedFire

New member
Apr 25, 2011
126
0
0
They might be trying to avoid the quiet 'summer release zone'. Is it me, or is it only quiet because nobody releases anything? If they release some games it probably wouldn't be quiet.
 

Dogstile

New member
Jan 17, 2009
5,093
0
0
Tanis said:
If devs were SMART they wouldn't release so many games during the Nov-Jan month.

They'd at least TRY and release some major titles throughout the year.

But, hey, this is the SAME industry that's getting away with putting out half-made, bug ridden, garbage and then patching them (if we're lucky) a few months later.

Seriously?
FUCK-THIS-GEN

>_>
Didn't releasing the buggy as hell games work the last couple generations as well? They just didn't bother fixing them after.
 

WanderingFool

New member
Apr 9, 2009
3,991
0
0
CJ1145 said:
It's simple: we kill the Batman. they simply are overestimating their own game, and underestimating their own stupidity. That, or the devs secretly hate this project and want it to flop, and this is the most obvious way to bring that about.
Ah! Mystery solved. /thread

But seriously... Sega...

RELEASE THE FUCKING GAME!!!

[sub]I used all caps for that, so you know I mean business.[/sub]
 

shintakie10

New member
Sep 3, 2008
1,342
0
0
I...what? You have a game that is finished, you aren't havin more content for it made at the moment, and you choose not to release it to a portion of your customers. Not only do you choose not to release it, you decide to sit on it for at least half a year.

What kind of weird strategy is this?
 

WindKnight

Quiet, Odd Sort.
Legacy
Jul 8, 2009
1,828
9
43
Cephiro
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
uh, why do some people in this thread seem to be blaming the developers for what the publisher is doing?
 

saintdane05

New member
Aug 2, 2011
1,849
0
0
I can understand this. The publishers are worried that the game won't sell well, so they are testing it with a smaller market. Perfectly reasonable.
 

Atmos Duality

New member
Mar 3, 2010
8,473
0
0
Unless Sega is reconsidering the costs for distribution* I cannot think of any rational reason to do that. They've already paid for the game; release it!

[sub](*currency exchange losses being the only reason I can think of; maybe they anticipate a stronger US dollar in Q1 2013? What the hell is going on in Japan?)[/sub]
 

Mr. Omega

ANTI-LIFE JUSTIFIES MY HATE!
Jul 1, 2010
3,902
0
0
Sega: If we can't shove Sonic in it somehow, we will go out of our way to make it fail!
 

Tanis

The Last Albino
Aug 30, 2010
5,264
0
0
dogstile said:
Didn't releasing the buggy as hell games work the last couple generations as well? They just didn't bother fixing them after.
Yep, they did, but the games were panned and often failed because of it.

Nowadays releasing half a game and releasing DLC seems to be the norm, and even accepted.