Analyst Thinks Next Starcraft II Won't Come This Year

Greg Tito

PR for Dungeons & Dragons
Sep 29, 2005
12,070
0
0
Analyst Thinks Next Starcraft II Won't Come This Year



It's looking more and more like Heart of the Swarm will hatch in 2013.

Once upon a time, there was an elite military operative named Sarah Kerrigan. Then she went all buggy, and her erstwhile boyfriend Jim Raynor tried to blow her up. But then there was a chance - just a sliver, mind you - that things could go differently. Narratively, that's how Blizzard has left us hanging since the end of campaign of Starcraft II: Wings of Liberty, released all the way back in mid 2010. The concept of breaking up the story of the real-time strategy sequel into three distinct games rather than expansions hinged on delivering the next two iterations over the next two years. Here we are, two years later, and there's no Heart of the Swarm release date on our books. Doug Creutz - an analyst for financial firm Cowen & Company - doesn't think we'll get one in 2012, estimating 2013 at the earliest.

"Typically, Blizzard puts its new titles into beta for 3-6 months before they are officially released," he wrote in a report on Activision Blizzard this week. "With only 5 months left in the year, while it is still possible that Swarm could make the fiscal year, we are now assuming it ships in FY13."

Even though there's no public beta yet, Blizzard will be showing off multiplayer units from all three races - Terran, Protoss, Zerg - at the Gamescom festival in Germany this summer. That's a good sign that at least the designers are hard at work, but it could also be why there's been such a delay. The first Starcraft II iteration is so well-balanced that it has been adopted as a esport even more than its predecessor. I'm sure Blizzard wants to make absolutely sure the changes don't screw that up.

That's all fine, but for us non-pro strategy fans, I just want to continue the story. I don't want Heart of the Swarm to end up like Half-Life 3.

Source: CVG [http://www.computerandvideogames.com/360838/starcraft-2-heart-of-the-swarm-2012-release-increasingly-unlikely/]

Permalink
 

Viper114

New member
Dec 3, 2008
45
0
0
It was already said by Blizzard earlier that they were going to be able to release two products this year, Diablo 3 and one other which wasn't chosen yet. Since MoP now has a release date of September 25th 2012, logically the next SC2 episode won't be due until 2013. Which makes sense, since it seems anything about SC2 makes it out to being still developed.
 

ProtonGuy

New member
Apr 7, 2011
95
0
0
I wonder if this is going to turn into Starcraft Ghost. Anyone else remember that piece of vaporware?
 

Vivi22

New member
Aug 22, 2010
2,300
0
0
ZippyDSMlee said:
I am betting online only for it.
For what? The full game? Because it's already been stated repeatedly that it's going to include a single player.
 

Greg Tito

PR for Dungeons & Dragons
Sep 29, 2005
12,070
0
0
DVS BSTrD said:
You don't "Heart" Mr. Games Editor?
Maybe there wouldn't be such "overwhelming" spikes in traffic if you guys didn't rush to put out three articles within five minutes of each other.
Thanks for the tips!
 

paketep

New member
Jul 14, 2008
260
0
0
First, who cares about Blizz after SC2 and especially after D3?

And second: enough news about what analysts think!. Most of them are nothing more than tarot card readers, and those that know something don't say a thing.
 

paketep

New member
Jul 14, 2008
260
0
0
ZippyDSMlee said:
Vivi22 said:
ZippyDSMlee said:
I am betting online only for it.
For what? The full game? Because it's already been stated repeatedly that it's going to include a single player.
Daiblo 3 has single player as well.
Yeah, but it's so crippled by Blizzard's idiocy that it might as well drop it.

Multiplayer also.
 

Vivi22

New member
Aug 22, 2010
2,300
0
0
ZippyDSMlee said:
Vivi22 said:
ZippyDSMlee said:
I am betting online only for it.
For what? The full game? Because it's already been stated repeatedly that it's going to include a single player.
Daiblo 3 has single player as well.
Ah, so you mean always online in order to play single player? WoL is technically always online, but there was offline mode for single player if you weren't connected to the internet. I see no reason why they would change that, particularly since there's no reason for it (not even their made up reasons for Diablo 3 apply to the single player Starcraft experience), and they already had a huge backlash against them over Diablo 3.
 

ZippyDSMlee

New member
Sep 1, 2007
3,959
0
0
paketep said:
ZippyDSMlee said:
Vivi22 said:
ZippyDSMlee said:
I am betting online only for it.
For what? The full game? Because it's already been stated repeatedly that it's going to include a single player.
Daiblo 3 has single player as well.
Yeah, but it's so crippled by Blizzard's idiocy that it might as well drop it.

Multiplayer also.
That won't stop them from putting it all their games tho. ^^

Vivi22 said:
ZippyDSMlee said:
Vivi22 said:
ZippyDSMlee said:
I am betting online only for it.
For what? The full game? Because it's already been stated repeatedly that it's going to include a single player.
Daiblo 3 has single player as well.
Ah, so you mean always online in order to play single player? WoL is technically always online, but there was offline mode for single player if you weren't connected to the internet. I see no reason why they would change that, particularly since there's no reason for it (not even their made up reasons for Diablo 3 apply to the single player Starcraft experience), and they already had a huge backlash against them over Diablo 3.
Has not stopped Ubisoft any and I see no reason why they would not do it since they pretty much already have destroyed their reputation.
 

antidonkey

New member
Dec 10, 2009
1,724
0
0
This just in....Blizzard doesn't release game in timely manner. Film at 11!

This comes as no surprise to me. It's blizzard doing what blizzard does. Admittedly, this does sadden me slightly as I don't play WoW anymore and was looking forward to the next part of SC2. Oh well, I have plenty to keep me occupied until they get this thing out the door.
 

Quiet Stranger

New member
Feb 4, 2006
4,409
0
0
The only way Blizzard could win back my heart is if they decided to make SC: Ghost, that would be lovely!

They should have just released SC 2 as a full game.
 

walrusaurus

New member
Mar 1, 2011
595
0
0
Suki_ said:
Wow these analysts are really good at stating the obvious. Blizzard already announced a wow expansion for later this year so they will not also be releasing the next starcraft around that time. If I had to guess I would say they will release this around six months later so as not to interfere with wow.
They are two astronomically different types of games. The release of one has no bearing on the sales of the other beyond blizzards resources to support the launch. WHile I agree that they would never release both games in the same quarter that has a lot more to do with keeping their shareholders happy than any concerns about the games cannibalizing one another.
 

Vivi22

New member
Aug 22, 2010
2,300
0
0
ZippyDSMlee said:
Has not stopped Ubisoft any and I see no reason why they would not do it since they pretty much already have destroyed their reputation.
Uhh, even Ubisoft started backing away from that due to the lashing they were getting from fans. But no, your logic is totally flawless. They hurt their reputation with Diablo 3, so it definitely makes sense for them to do something which they didn't in the previous game, is completely unnecessary, and which could only serve to harm their reputation more.

I find it a bit more likely that they'll just keep doing what they did last time.

Quiet Stranger said:
They should have just released SC 2 as a full game.
I have to say that I hate this argument because it's such an obvious load of crap which people like to trot out to take undeserved shots at Blizzard. If you want to hate on Blizzard for anything, there are plenty of legitimate issues to talk about with them. But saying that a game which had as many single player missions as the original, new units, additional challenges, a co-op mode, and a full featured multiplayer with integrated ladder rankings and three different races is somehow incomplete is a disingenuous argument to say the least.
 

ZippyDSMlee

New member
Sep 1, 2007
3,959
0
0
Vivi22 said:
ZippyDSMlee said:
Has not stopped Ubisoft any and I see no reason why they would not do it since they pretty much already have destroyed their reputation.
Uhh, even Ubisoft started backing away from that due to the lashing they were getting from fans. But no, your logic is totally flawless. They hurt their reputation with Diablo 3, so it definitely makes sense for them to do something which they didn't in the previous game, is completely unnecessary, and which could only serve to harm their reputation more.

I find it a bit more likely that they'll just keep doing what they did last time.
And yet ubi has done nothing to change and there is no proper D3 offline mode as of yet, thus the current trend is constant online connections for these 2 devs unless you are on the WIIPS360.

They care more about the stockholders than consumers this also dose not help in removal of constant online connections.

Until they show functional change they have not changed any at all.