New York State Considering DLC Tax

Keane Ng

New member
Sep 11, 2008
5,892
0
0
New York State Considering DLC Tax



Downloadable content for games, music, movies and more will come with a local and state sales tax in the state of New York [http://www.state.ny.us/] if a proposed state budget is passed.

Responding to the dire economic times, New York governor David Paterson [http://www.ny.gov/governor/] has proposed a revised state budget which would ease the burden on state and local governments by cutting jobs and services and raising taxes, including an "iPod tax" that would require downloadable content to be subject to the same taxes as anything purchased at a regular brick-and-mortar shop. The budget document proposes to close the digital property taxation loophole by imposing "state and local sales tax on purchases of prewritten software, digital audio, audio-visual and text files, digital photographs, games and other electronically delivered entertainment services to achieve tax parity."

The implications of this for iTunes are annoying but perhaps more significant when you think about what it could mean for Xbox Live. With the Microsoft Points system structured the way it is currently, you have to buy points in inconveniently proportioned units determined by Microsoft. You know, there's always 100 Points left over after you buy something. If the sales tax were to come into play, would it knock Microsoft's carefully arranged Points system out of balance since things would suddenly cost a bit more than an even amount of Points? Would that inevitably mean that we'd have to shell out for more or that we'd finally be able to spend those extra spacebucks to cover the sales tax. Either way, if you still want to buy that armored horse in Oblivion and live in New York, do it now.

Paterson's budget has more serious consequences beyond whether or not we're paying more for Katy Perry songs or Xbox Live themes. It also calls for a reduction in school aid and layoffs for 521 state workers, among other things. "We're going to have to take some extreme measures," Paterson said. "Maybe we should have thought about this when we were depending on what we thought was inexhaustive collections of taxes from Wall Street - and now those taxes have fallen off a cliff."

That aside, Paterson's rationale for arguing for the DLC tax is to close a loophole and "achieve tax parity." Is this a legitimate claim? Should downloadable goods be subject to sales tax - would that be more fair? What do you guys think?

[Via GamePolitics [http://www.gamepolitics.com/2008/12/17/proposed-new-york-state-budget-would-tax-dlc]]

Permalink
 

Aardvark

New member
Sep 9, 2008
1,721
0
0
So if I'm ever in New York, proxy/VPN my arse out of there before downloading content.
 

Rankao

New member
Mar 10, 2008
361
0
0
I'm pretty sure that New York State can not collect tax money if the company does not have any physical operation based in the state.
1) A State cannot collect takes from a foreign service out of united states or even just out of the state.
2) States can not enact Tariffs
 

uppitycracker

New member
Oct 9, 2008
864
0
0
cleverlymadeup said:
isn't there an internet tax ban that is imposed by congress?

think that law will get tossed out pretty quick
if by internet tax ban, you mean making it illegal to tax online sales, not quite. i know texas is one of the states where we have to pay sales tax for online purchases. doesnt apply to DLC or any of that jazz, but again, i'm kinda unclear what exactly this would entitle.
 

TsunamiWombat

New member
Sep 6, 2008
5,870
0
0
I don't think this will work. DLC is iffy because your not buying a physical product. It's not like shopping online, where someone ships you a damn disc or something...
 

HobbesMkii

Hold Me Closer Tony Danza
Jun 7, 2008
856
0
0
Well, technically it's a good or service rendered to the purchaser in exchange for money, even if it doesn't have a physical presence. So, yes, I think it's taxable. Should it be taxed? Well, I dunno. There's certainly no good reason I can come up with for excluding it, outside of it is inconvenient to the consumer to pay such a tax.
 

stompy

New member
Jan 21, 2008
2,951
0
0
Where's the extra money going? Into the pockets of the politicians, since it ain't going into the local infrastructure?