Digital Distribution Driving Down Rare Game Values

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
Digital Distribution Driving Down Rare Game Values


Digital re-releases of classic games are undeniably good for just about everyone, but some collectors may be less than thrilled by the new accessibility of rare titles as it drives down the value of their games.

'When you think about it, it's actually quite predictable," Ars Technica [http://www.racketboy.com/]. "Those that have the valuable games don't like the trend for the most part. They feel like their collection is losing value, so they can be quite defensive."

That "trend" is the explosive growth of digital downloads, and the resulting easy access to classic videogames that were previously both hard to find and prohibitively expensive. "XBLA [http://www.thatgamecalledrez.com/] in the middle of the year, the games dropped $5 to $15 in value, moreso for the Dreamcast version of Ikaruga... It seems that the Dreamcast games hold their value a bit more as it is more of a cult classic system, and they are also Japanese imports."

In fact, Nick predicted as far as back 2006 that collecting videogames as a financial investment was a losing proposition. In a post entitled "Gametap [http://www.racketboy.com/retro/2006/05/game-collecting-dont-invest-in-vintage.html] and "reprints" of games that saw limited initial release would all inevitably drive down the dollar value of videogame collections. "Between the fact that interest in most original copies of older games gradually decreases and the number of game reprints (legal and illegal) are on the rise, I would strongly recommend that you focus on collecting games that you actually enjoy as opposed to looking to vintage games as an investment," he wrote.

The dilemma facing "investment collectors" is one I hadn't considered. I take a good bit of pride in my own collection (although it's relatively tiny) but the monetary value of my games is something I've never really considered, except during those thankfully rare instances when I'm laying out the bucks for an old Origin game on eBay [http://www.ebay.com]. I tend not to buy digitally because I enjoy the "extra stuff" - the boxes, manuals, bonus content, swizzle-stick and autographed photo of Buddy Burbank - as much as the game itself. But that's my own particular gamer aesthetic at work, not some long-term investment plan. Do any of you buy rare games with the hopes of seeing a big return on your investment - and if so, is digital distribution making you nervous?


Permalink
 

Pipotchi

New member
Jan 17, 2008
958
0
0
I still have my original boxed copies of Planescape Torment and Suikoden 2, but thats because I couldnt bring myself to trade them in rather than the monetary value.
 

fix-the-spade

New member
Feb 25, 2008
8,639
0
0
This news makes me happy.
Most collectors/investors strike me as either elitist or unethical people. They intend to make a profit by restricting other people's ability to enjoy something good. Anything that undermines that pleases me. Good things are for sharing.

Ikaruga being a good case in point, I hardly know anyone besides myself with either a Dreamcast or a Cube. It's difficult to get someone playing a game if they have to hunt down a rare or old console then pay way over the odds for an old-ish game. Now telling them it's on XBLA for £5 makes spreading the word much simpler.
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
Is it bad I know where the Buddy Burbank poster is from?

Ah well, I'll just stick with my Ghost Widow HeroClix and Everquest 2 teatowel.
 

CoverYourHead

High Priest of C'Thulhu
Dec 7, 2008
2,514
0
0
I never collected games, way too expensive, and playing them is much more fun then letting them collect dust while I'm hoping to sell them one day.
 

Avida

New member
Oct 17, 2008
1,030
0
0
Well thats nice, becaus losing a few quid is fine, because they'll always have some value - digital nevers beats the real thing, porn teaches us that.
 

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
fix-the-spade said:
Most collectors/investors strike me as either elitist or unethical people. They intend to make a profit by restricting other people's ability to enjoy something good.
That's a bit harsh. Some people, in fact I'd say most people, collect simply for the joy of collecting. I've lined the wallets of a few sellers over the years (nothing too serious, of course) not because I'm building a retirement portfolio but because I appreciated and desired a specific example of the art form. Likewise, I've had my collection seriously pumped up by a fellow collector who wanted to get rid of a bunch of his stuff and decided to give it to an aficionado who'd really appreciate it rather than sell it off.

That said, I think this is a great trend too: Newcomers get to play some really amazing games they may have missed out on and I still get to indulge my desire for CIB originals. Hell, if Ars is right about this, I'll even get to take advantage of lower prices on older games as speculators abandon the market. It's a win for everyone.
 

CarlosYenrac

New member
Nov 20, 2007
104
0
0
Hmmmm... I suppose this means my almost complete set of hardcover Discworld novels will be worth almost nothing soon, as they're all available on audiobook CD...

Anyone collecting original copies of old games in the hopes of selling them for a profit has completely missed the point(in my not-always-humble opinion).
I'm looking forward to the scalpers abandoning the scene and driving down the prices for those of us who appreciate what we're buying.
 

PedroSteckecilo

Mexican Fugitive
Feb 7, 2008
6,732
0
0
I have a "collection" and I do enjoy hunting rare games in stores but I would never call it an investment, it's more for fun than anything else. That and I do really want to play the games I track down.
 

Rednog

New member
Nov 3, 2008
3,567
0
0
I personally am a fan of Digital Distribution because there are always a handful of games which I've never had a chance to play and really don't want to pay an arm and a leg for them, and it also means that I have them on a new console and don't have to drag out an old system and pray that it still works/ I have all the right cords.
 

Pipotchi

New member
Jan 17, 2008
958
0
0
Avida said:
Well thats nice, becaus losing a few quid is fine, because they'll always have some value - digital nevers beats the real thing, porn teaches us that.
This man speaks the truth
 

Unusual_Bulge

New member
May 30, 2008
56
0
0
While they might not be a worthwhile investment now or in the short term I think I can see rare computer games becoming collector's items in the (really) long term.

I'd compare it to old book collection. Books can be reprinted dozens of times with practically no qualitative changes to cover designs and font, they can (and increasingly will) be digitally distributed, they can be available to read for absolutely free in public libraries. But it isn't about the content, it's about the physical item. Collectors will still pay through the nose for a first edition.
 

Aardvark

New member
Sep 9, 2008
1,721
0
0
Digital distribution hasn't gone far enough. The internet, in its commercial form, has been around for about fifteen years and I still have to line up, like a schlub, at some game store, surrounded by the unwashed scum of the earth, if I want to get a day 1 release. Balls to that.

Old games are merely testing the water, due to their conveniently small size.
 

L.B. Jeffries

New member
Nov 29, 2007
2,175
0
0
Just means you've got to collect more carefully. When the Great Machine War of 2012 strikes, large numbers of games will be preserved by the supercomputer. The more obscure stuff, like my copy of Eric the Unready, is what will help me barter my way out of the slave camps and become a true road samurai.