Game of Thrones Writer Inspired by Breaking Bad's Evil Protagonist

Cognimancer

Imperial Intelligence
Jun 13, 2012
1,906
0
0
Game of Thrones Writer Inspired by Breaking Bad's Evil Protagonist



Breaking Bad's Walter White is so impressively evil that George R.R. Martin has been inspired to step up his game. This does not bode well for Westeros.

A Song of Ice and Fire (along with its TV adaptation Game of Thrones) has some pretty evil characters. Arguably, most of its characters fall somewhere on the scale between evil and downright monstrous. And yet, series author George R.R. Martin has been one-upped. After watching the most recent episode of Breaking Bad, he admitted that he'd been beaten at his own game, remarking that "Walter White is a bigger monster than anyone in Westeros."

Now, anyone can make that comparison and take part in the ensuing argument that will inevitably follow. But remember, this comes from the man who is still actively writing the future of Westeros, and that means he still has time to reclaim his throne. Fans who were shocked by Martin's first comment should be terrified of what he said next: "I need to do something about that." You think Joffrey's bad? Or the Red Wedding? It might be time to buckle down; it's only getting more evil from here.

Despite the grudge, Martin harbors no ill will towards Breaking Bad. He calls it an "amazing series," and is eager to see how it fares against Game of Thrones at this year's Emmys. Breaking Bad is wrapping up its final season, but Game of Thrones has a lot of material left to cover - Season 4 is scheduled to premiere early next year, and Martin still has two novels to finish before the saga is over. If he's serious about one-upping Walter White, I just hope there's a world left to fight over by then.

Source: George R.R. Martin [http://grrm.livejournal.com/337511.html]

Permalink
 

TheIceQueen

New member
Sep 15, 2013
420
0
0
As if things couldn't get worse for the Starks. Those poor, poor wolves.

Martin, you've already taken all of my feels. How much more do you want?
 

Gethsemani_v1legacy

New member
Oct 1, 2009
2,552
0
0
It is at times like these that I get confirmation of my prejudice that Martin is a mediocre writer with an excellent imagination and world building skill. Either that or simply a sadistic man who gets off on letting bad things happen to good people in his works. Or maybe both.

It would be easier to be smug about this if I wasn't waiting so eagerly for Winds of Winter.
 

Abomination

New member
Dec 17, 2012
2,939
0
0
Gethsemani said:
It is at times like these that I get confirmation of my prejudice that Martin is a mediocre writer with an excellent imagination and world building skill. Either that or simply a sadistic man who gets off on letting bad things happen to good people in his works. Or maybe both.

It would be easier to be smug about this if I wasn't waiting so eagerly for Winds of Winter.
I actually think Martin should try and do a coalition with another writer. Martin and they sit down every time with Martin just emptying his brain of ideas, plots, characters, developments and the universe with the other party focusing on putting it together in a cohesive narrative.

On top of that when Martin (inevitably but certainly unfortunately) passes there will be a writer to pick up that torch and have an understanding as to where to take the world of Westeros.

One can dream...

And at the same time it's great to see writers feeding off each other as I feel that can lead to some truly complex and amazing stories/settings/characters.
 

toms

New member
Oct 23, 2008
54
0
0
Abomination said:
Gethsemani said:
It is at times like these that I get confirmation of my prejudice that Martin is a mediocre writer with an excellent imagination and world building skill. Either that or simply a sadistic man who gets off on letting bad things happen to good people in his works. Or maybe both.

It would be easier to be smug about this if I wasn't waiting so eagerly for Winds of Winter.
I actually think Martin should try and do a coalition with another writer. Martin and they sit down every time with Martin just emptying his brain of ideas, plots, characters, developments and the universe with the other party focusing on putting it together in a cohesive narrative.

On top of that when Martin (inevitably but certainly unfortunately) passes there will be a writer to pick up that torch and have an understanding as to where to take the world of Westeros.

One can dream...

And at the same time it's great to see writers feeding off each other as I feel that can lead to some truly complex and amazing stories/settings/characters.
He should team up with Terry Pratchett, I'd read that.
 

Olas

Hello!
Dec 24, 2011
3,226
0
0

As someone who's only read 2 books and doesn't watch the show there may be a lot I'm missing, but it seems like Westeros has more than enough evil to go around. In fact I think it could really use Hank.
 

Vegosiux

New member
May 18, 2011
4,381
0
0
I'm actually not too happy with how flanderized Walter got by now. Why do they always do that instead of ending a series on a season when characters have not yet become exaggerated caricatures of themselves?
 

Adam Jensen_v1legacy

I never asked for this
Sep 8, 2011
6,651
0
0
Every time I hear news about G.R.R. Martin I get scared. What the hell is he going to do now to some of my favorite fantasy literature characters? Hopefully Daenerys and Arya won't end up dead.
 

Psychobabble

. . . . . . . .
Aug 3, 2013
525
0
0
Abomination said:
Gethsemani said:
It is at times like these that I get confirmation of my prejudice that Martin is a mediocre writer with an excellent imagination and world building skill. Either that or simply a sadistic man who gets off on letting bad things happen to good people in his works. Or maybe both.

It would be easier to be smug about this if I wasn't waiting so eagerly for Winds of Winter.
I actually think Martin should try and do a coalition with another writer. Martin and they sit down every time with Martin just emptying his brain of ideas, plots, characters, developments and the universe with the other party focusing on putting it together in a cohesive narrative.

On top of that when Martin (inevitably but certainly unfortunately) passes there will be a writer to pick up that torch and have an understanding as to where to take the world of Westeros.

One can dream...

And at the same time it's great to see writers feeding off each other as I feel that can lead to some truly complex and amazing stories/settings/characters.
I can see the best advice from the other writer now, "Well yes that does sound good George, but how about you create a character that doesn't die horribly or get their lives ruined and their faces crammed into the muck? Maybe some of your fans would like to garner emotional investment in your story without the fear it will end with them sad and depressed and deciding to just put The Smiths song Asleep on an endless loop and crawl into bed with a plastic bag over their head, rather than just watching their favorite characters get murdered."
 

Amaror

New member
Apr 15, 2011
1,509
0
0
What? I have seen the latest Breaking Bad episode and while he's a pretty big asshole to jessy like always, he's nowhere near as bad as the bastard of bolton or joffrey.
I mean it's
Tortures for Joy, physically as well as psychology.

And

Wants to get the one he blames for hanks death get killed and kidnaps his own daughter... for like a day, before bringing her back.
 

Abomination

New member
Dec 17, 2012
2,939
0
0
toms said:
Abomination said:
Gethsemani said:
It is at times like these that I get confirmation of my prejudice that Martin is a mediocre writer with an excellent imagination and world building skill. Either that or simply a sadistic man who gets off on letting bad things happen to good people in his works. Or maybe both.

It would be easier to be smug about this if I wasn't waiting so eagerly for Winds of Winter.
I actually think Martin should try and do a coalition with another writer. Martin and they sit down every time with Martin just emptying his brain of ideas, plots, characters, developments and the universe with the other party focusing on putting it together in a cohesive narrative.

On top of that when Martin (inevitably but certainly unfortunately) passes there will be a writer to pick up that torch and have an understanding as to where to take the world of Westeros.

One can dream...

And at the same time it's great to see writers feeding off each other as I feel that can lead to some truly complex and amazing stories/settings/characters.
He should team up with Terry Pratchett, I'd read that.
While it would probably be a match made in heaven... Pratchett is in an unfortunate similar circumstance. What with him supposedly having suffered a stroke that was misdiagnosed as Alzheimer's.

There is -another- Pratchett who could step in though?
 

Legion

Were it so easy
Oct 2, 2008
7,190
0
0
GrinningCat said:
As if things couldn't get worse for the Starks. Those poor, poor wolves.

Martin, you've already taken all of my feels. How much more do you want?
I know what you mean...

I finished all of the books before the second and third television season came out. So I have had the experience of watching a friend of mines growing horror as he goes through the books and finds out what happens.

The author really seems to hate the good characters.

Gethsemani said:
It is at times like these that I get confirmation of my prejudice that Martin is a mediocre writer with an excellent imagination and world building skill. Either that or simply a sadistic man who gets off on letting bad things happen to good people in his works. Or maybe both.

It would be easier to be smug about this if I wasn't waiting so eagerly for Winds of Winter.
I am not entirely sure I can agree. While he certainly does have a sense of sadism in regards to the characters, he also manages to make characters who do bad things sympathetic. We get people such as Jamie and Tywin Lannister who at first seem to be quite evil, but are shown to not be as bad as they first appear. The characters are not one dimensional at all, even characters such as Sandor Clegane have redeemable features, despite also doing horrible things.

Not many average writers can make you not entirely hate the bad guys.

Vegosiux said:
I'm actually not too happy with how flanderized Walter got by now.
 

Adam Jensen_v1legacy

I never asked for this
Sep 8, 2011
6,651
0
0
NameIsRobertPaulson said:
Adam Jensen said:
Every time I hear news about G.R.R. Martin I get scared. What the hell is he going to do now to some of my favorite fantasy literature characters? Hopefully Daenerys and Arya won't end up dead.
Dany is essentially the heroine (if there is one), and has had so many "kick the puppy" moments done to her that I don't think even George can stand to wail on her anymore.

Dany is tied with Jon Snow with the greatest odds of surviving the series. My favorite character (Cersei) still lives simply because George actively hates his readership's opinions.
Bolded part is what scares me.
 

Smertnik

New member
Apr 5, 2010
1,172
0
0
Psychobabble said:
I can see the best advice from the other writer now, "Well yes that does sound good George, but how about you create a character that doesn't die horribly or get their lives ruined and their faces crammed into the muck?
He did, though. Most protagonists (i.e. the ones with their own chapters who were introduced in the beginning) are still around and I'm sure the majority is going to survive until the end.
And it's as Martin said in an interview - when you know that the hero is going to survive no matter what since s/he's a hero you don't get any real suspense, which I'm fully agree with him on. Besides, since there're quite a lot of protagonists he can afford to kill off a few.


Legion said:
I am not entirely sure I can agree. While he certainly does have a sense of sadism in regards to the characters, he also manages to make characters who do bad things sympathetic.
The POV chapters help a great in that, I think. If you know the intent and thinking behind someone's actions it makes you actually understand the person instead of going "Hurr durr, they're evil".
 

Gethsemani_v1legacy

New member
Oct 1, 2009
2,552
0
0
Legion said:
I am not entirely sure I can agree. While he certainly does have a sense of sadism in regards to the characters, he also manages to make characters who do bad things sympathetic. We get people such as Jamie and Tywin Lannister who at first seem to be quite evil, but are shown to not be as bad as they first appear. The characters are not one dimensional at all, even characters such as Sandor Clegane have redeemable features, despite also doing horrible things.

Not many average writers can make you not entirely hate the bad guys.
I totally agree. As I said, my problem is that he feels like a mediocre writer with an excellent imagination. The setting, the characters and the events are all fascinating and captivating. The problem is that more often than not you have to see past the plodding, drawn out pacing, the "author masturbation"-sections of sex or naked women thrown in for little reason other than that Martin seemed like he was getting horny and had to rub one out or the never ending sections of Martin telling you the entire menu of a feast or describing individual people passing by on a street. I know some people love details like, but for me it makes for a series of books that at times are unbearably slow.

Couple that with how A Feast for Crows went literally nowhere and how Martin sometimes seems uncertain off where he is going with the story and throws around idiot balls and deus ex machinas (Stannis attack on King's Landing is a prime example, the Stark's at the Red Wedding being another) to get himself out of the corner he writes himself into and you've got an extraordinary setting in the hands of a writer that just isn't up to the task to make stories to match the setting.
 

Sight Unseen

The North Remembers
Nov 18, 2009
1,064
0
0
NameIsRobertPaulson said:
Adam Jensen said:
Every time I hear news about G.R.R. Martin I get scared. What the hell is he going to do now to some of my favorite fantasy literature characters? Hopefully Daenerys and Arya won't end up dead.
Dany is essentially the heroine (if there is one), and has had so many "kick the puppy" moments done to her that I don't think even George can stand to wail on her anymore.

Dany is tied with Jon Snow with the greatest odds of surviving the series. My favorite character (Cersei) still lives simply because George actively hates his readership's opinions.
Dany is essentially the heroine (if there is one)

...


Eddard Stark

Robb Stark

Catelyn Stark

I think your argument is invalidated.

Also have you read the books, because
Jon Snow is already dead.

Also I think Arya and Dany are two of the MOST likely characters NOT to survive the coming winter, but that's just my opinion.
 

Amaror

New member
Apr 15, 2011
1,509
0
0
Gethsemani said:
Couple that with how A Feast for Crows went literally nowhere and how Martin sometimes seems uncertain off where he is going with the story and throws around idiot balls and deus ex machinas (Stannis attack on King's Landing is a prime example, the Stark's at the Red Wedding being another) to get himself out of the corner he writes himself into and you've got an extraordinary setting in the hands of a writer that just isn't up to the task to make stories to match the setting.
I disagree with you. And while you are welcome to your opinion you don't seem to know what Deus ex machina means, or you don't got what happened in the story.
A Deus ex machina means that a conflict is solved by either sudden Events, which come out of nowhere, or an external power, like a god or something.
Neither of your examples is a conflict being solved.
Besides, Stannis attack on Kings Landing wasn't sudden at all. It was what the whole second Book, or season, was all about.
The Red Wedding was a sudden Event, but it wasn't a solution to a conflict either. It didn't came out of nowhere too, you could tell that something was about to happen. You didn't guess what it was, but you can't tell me you didn't expect anything extrordinary to happen at this wedding.
You know what that kind of thing is called? A Twist.
Neither of those qualify as Deus ex machina. You're welcome to your opinion of not liking his work, but please educate yourself before you start throwing terms around without knowing what they mean.
 

Sight Unseen

The North Remembers
Nov 18, 2009
1,064
0
0
Gethsemani said:
Legion said:
I am not entirely sure I can agree. While he certainly does have a sense of sadism in regards to the characters, he also manages to make characters who do bad things sympathetic. We get people such as Jamie and Tywin Lannister who at first seem to be quite evil, but are shown to not be as bad as they first appear. The characters are not one dimensional at all, even characters such as Sandor Clegane have redeemable features, despite also doing horrible things.

Not many average writers can make you not entirely hate the bad guys.
Couple that with how A Feast for Crows went literally nowhere and how Martin sometimes seems uncertain off where he is going with the story and throws around idiot balls and deus ex machinas (Stannis attack on King's Landing is a prime example, the Stark's at the Red Wedding being another) to get himself out of the corner he writes himself into and you've got an extraordinary setting in the hands of a writer that just isn't up to the task to make stories to match the setting.
The Red Wedding was NOT a deus ex machina. It was heavily foreshadowed as early as A Game of Thrones, and several times much more obviously in A Clash of Kings. Same with Stannis's defeat at the blackwater.

AFFC is incredibly important when combined with ADWD for world building and resetting the stage for more epicness to unfold in TWOW.

If I had more time I'd explain more but simply put, you're wrong IMO.