Future Mars Rover Could Hop Across the Surface

Ruley

New member
Sep 3, 2010
192
0
0
Future Mars Rover Could Hop Across the Surface



A new concept design for a Mars probe relies on compressed gas to move around the Red Planet

The design of probes sent to Mars over the years hasn't deviated much from the standard rover we all know and love - most recently in the form of Curiosity. There have been a few attempts to mix up the familiar, most notably in the form of the failed Beagle 2 project, but none have ever truly pushed beyond a conventionally safe means of exploration. The risks of designs similar to planes, helicopters and hot air balloons have simply appeared too risky. But now, a UK team is developing a robot that can bounce across the surface of the Red Planet.

The group from Leicester University wanted to address the problem of terrain difficulties encountered on Mars. Curiosity's route to its next scientific stop along the Martian surface specifically avoids a dangerous sand trap between it and its destination. The main issue of propellant supply is addressed by theorizing that such a robot could extract carbon dioxide from the planet's atmosphere before being compressed and liquefied. It would then be pumped into a chamber and exposed to an intense heat from a radioactive source on board. The CO2 would ignite and generate thrust through directional nozzles. Calculations over the course of development suggest the one tonne craft could leap a distance of 900m at a time. "The advantage of this approach is that you have the ability to traverse more aggressive terrains but also that you have wider mobility - the possibility of traversing much greater distances than we have with even the very successful rovers," says Hugo Williams, from Leicester's Space Research Centre.

The biggest problem facing the robot is the hopper's legs. Designs used in previous Mars projects have only been required to function once on landing. They have thus been a collapsible honeycomb lattice that absorbed some of the impact before becoming crushed and useless after reaching the surface. The hopper would require reusable legs that can be reset after taking the impact of each successive landing. Ideas used here on Earth would carry too much risk, such as designs that rely on hydraulic fluid. The team instead has turned to magnetism to solve this dilemma. "When you drop a magnet down a copper tube, you expect it to fall under gravity but it falls very slowly because, as the magnet drops, it creates eddy currents that generate an opposing magnetic field," explains Mike Williams, a mission systems engineer at the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company (EADS). He goes on to say that; "Our legs would use this approach - a very simple, elegant solution that produces a damping effect. Nothing is crushed, and there are no fluids, which means we would be very insensitive to the environment and cold temperatures."

The project still has kinks to be ironed out, such as the system that collects CO2 currently taking several weeks to produce enough usable propellant for a jump. To be an efficient method of transport compared to past endeavors, the process needs to be shortened considerably. On top of that, static probes and mobile rovers have been doing a fantastic job of supplying data for analysis back on Earth. It's the question of whether conventionally inaccessible areas on Mars have enough scientific interest that will determine if this project truly gets off the ground.

Source: BBC News [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-24213830]

Permalink
 

Hero in a half shell

It's not easy being green
Dec 30, 2009
4,286
0
0
Aww, and here I was hoping for a story about how the NASA budget had been cut so much they were reduced to desperately trying to shoot frogs to Mars by a large novelty slingshot:



We'd all tune in to see that launch.
 

Dr.Awkward

New member
Mar 27, 2013
692
0
0
...So is no one else going to comment on how it looks like a sci-fi prop from the 60s? Because that's what the design concept looks like to me.
 

Skeleon

New member
Nov 2, 2007
5,410
0
0
Makes sense. What good is being on Mars if you don't get to use the low gravity to jump over giant canyons?
 

UltraXan

New member
Mar 1, 2011
288
0
0
It's the question of whether conventionally inaccessible areas on Mars have enough scientific interest that will determine if this project truly gets off the ground.
Ahhh, I see what you did there.

In all honesty, the idea of something that can jump 900m and land safely enough to do another jump with an almost earth-like gravity intrigues me greatly. I can understand if people who aren't used to the metric system can't see the scale of this, but 900 meters is a really long fucking distance. As in just under 3000 feet long fucking distance. Imagine something like that here on Earth! I'm painting this idea awesome.
 

Aeshi

New member
Dec 22, 2009
2,640
0
0
That's not hopping, that's just taking off and landing again multiple times.

I was hoping they'd made a Rover that actually jumps around :(

CAPTCHA: so-so
Yeah, that more-or-less sums this up.