GOG Returning "To Its Roots" After Regional Pricing Backlash

StewShearerOld

Geekdad News Writer
Jan 5, 2013
5,449
0
0
GOG Returning "To Its Roots" After Regional Pricing Backlash



GOG will has reaffirmed its desire to "fight for games with flat worldwide pricing."

Last month GOG rattled a few gamer's cages when it revealed that it would, to an extent, be abandoning its standard of fair and equal pricing in favor of <a href=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/132496-GOG-Addresses-Regional-Pricing-Controversy-Promises-Fairness-For-All>a regional model that would lead to different prices for some games depending on where you live. This didn't go over too well with many of the site's customers who, over the past few weeks, have left thousands of comments with expressing their unhappiness with the move. That in mind, GOG has recently revealed it will "getting back to [its] roots" and will take steps to restore its practice of "flat worldwide pricing."

"We're not perfect, we're exploring new frontiers, and we make mistakes," said GOG's Marcin Iwinski and Guilliaume Rambourg in a joint statement. "We thought DRM-Free was so important that you'd prefer we bring you more DRM-Free games and fair price was less critical and that it could be sacrificed in some cases... We didn't listen and we let you down."

Hoping to make up for their mistake Iwinski and Rambourg said that GOG going forward will "continue to fight for game with flat worldwide pricing." In turn, in cases where the company is "required to have regional prices" it will make up for it by offering free game codes and, eventually, store credit to affected customers. To help give is customers more choice it will also be implementing new options that will let individuals choose between paying in their local currency or in US dollars if they prefer. It's Iwinski and Rambourg's hope that these steps will help GOG "remain true to its values" while also offering "the best of DRM-free gaming with fair price."

Source: <a href=http://www.gog.com/news/getting_back_to_our_roots>GOG


Permalink
 
Apr 28, 2008
14,634
0
0
Meanwhile, on Steam and Origin "games are more expensive for you? Tough shit, deal with it fucker."

Props to GoG for trying to make it right.
 

Jaeger_CDN

New member
Aug 9, 2010
280
0
0
No company is perfect but GoG goes above and beyond to try and be that. At this point if a game is on Steam or any other platform as well as GoG, I go to GoG first simply because of being DRM-less, a reasonable refund policy and generally caring for consumers.
 

Erttheking

Member
Legacy
Oct 5, 2011
10,845
1
3
Country
United States
I always think highly of people who fuck up and then admit they fuck up and try to fix it. It takes a special kind of character.
 

WeepingAngels

New member
May 18, 2013
1,722
0
0
Flat rate pricing isn't fair and equal.

I just learned the other day that the min wage in Australia is close to $18 while our min wage in the US is $7.25. That means that an equal price for both countries would see Australians getting a $20 game in a little over an hour of work while in the US it would take us 3 hours. In short, it would make the game 3 times as expensive in the US.

I guess the squeaky wheel gets the grease though and there are no shortage of Australians squeaking about having to pay $100 for a new release.
 

veloper

New member
Jan 20, 2009
4,597
0
0
I'd rather have a bigger DRM-free game library on GOG, regional pricing or no, than worry about only a couple dollars worth, like some sad miser.

The initial compromise of free games with those euro priced games on GOG, was already much better than any other online shop and now we're stuck with regional pricing, without the freebies, but WITH DRM, so we only lose, thanks to the cheapskates.
 

UNHchabo

New member
Dec 24, 2008
535
0
0
WeepingAngels said:
Flat rate pricing isn't fair and equal.

I just learned the other day that the min wage in Australia is close to $18 while our min wage in the US is $7.25. That means that an equal price for both countries would see Australians getting a $20 game in a little over an hour of work while in the US it would take us 3 hours. In short, it would make the game 3 times as expensive in the US.

I guess the squeaky wheel gets the grease though and there are no shortage of Australians squeaking about having to pay $100 for a new release.
You need to take cost of living into account as well. Just like the cost of living is higher in NYC than in Iowa, with NYC also having a higher minimum wage, the same applies to Australia.

Comparing the entire countries, rent is nearly 60% higher in Australia, and most other goods and services are more than 40% more expensive:
http://www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/compare_countries_result.jsp?country1=United+States&country2=Australia
 

WeepingAngels

New member
May 18, 2013
1,722
0
0
UNHchabo said:
WeepingAngels said:
Flat rate pricing isn't fair and equal.

I just learned the other day that the min wage in Australia is close to $18 while our min wage in the US is $7.25. That means that an equal price for both countries would see Australians getting a $20 game in a little over an hour of work while in the US it would take us 3 hours. In short, it would make the game 3 times as expensive in the US.

I guess the squeaky wheel gets the grease though and there are no shortage of Australians squeaking about having to pay $100 for a new release.
You need to take cost of living into account as well. Just like the cost of living is higher in NYC than in Iowa, with NYC also having a higher minimum wage, the same applies to Australia.

Comparing the entire countries, rent is nearly 60% higher in Australia, and most other goods and services are more than 40% more expensive:
http://www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/compare_countries_result.jsp?country1=United+States&country2=Australia
Right, when you get paid more, the cost of living is higher and games are not exempt nor should they be. Your link says:

Consumer Prices in Australia are 43.72% higher than in United States

Well that's awesome for them considering their min wage is more than 100% higher than the US.

Now we are looking at GOG games being 3 times more expensive in the US than in Australia. Is that what you would call fair and equal pricing?
 

Galen Marek

New member
Dec 5, 2011
78
0
0
WeepingAngels said:
UNHchabo said:
WeepingAngels said:
Flat rate pricing isn't fair and equal.

I just learned the other day that the min wage in Australia is close to $18 while our min wage in the US is $7.25. That means that an equal price for both countries would see Australians getting a $20 game in a little over an hour of work while in the US it would take us 3 hours. In short, it would make the game 3 times as expensive in the US.

I guess the squeaky wheel gets the grease though and there are no shortage of Australians squeaking about having to pay $100 for a new release.
You need to take cost of living into account as well. Just like the cost of living is higher in NYC than in Iowa, with NYC also having a higher minimum wage, the same applies to Australia.

Comparing the entire countries, rent is nearly 60% higher in Australia, and most other goods and services are more than 40% more expensive:
http://www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/compare_countries_result.jsp?country1=United+States&country2=Australia
Right, when you get paid more, the cost of living is higher and games are not exempt nor should they be. Your link says:

Consumer Prices in Australia are 43.72% higher than in United States

Well that's awesome for them considering their min wage is more than 100% higher than the US.

Now we are looking at GOG games being 3 times more expensive in the US than in Australia. Is that what you would call fair and equal pricing?
Please show me Min wage in equal job with your tips (as tips aren't really a thing over here).
This would be a number that interests me.

Also get 2 cities in the "top 10 most expensive places to live in the world". Its our only strong point, and its not something to gloat about -_-

Edit: It would be also interesting to see 2 similiar jobs in non-tipping environments and how they compare for min wage and non-min wage. Comparing standard/averages prices amongst similiar jobs (bank tellers for example).
 

UNHchabo

New member
Dec 24, 2008
535
0
0
WeepingAngels said:
Right, when you get paid more, the cost of living is higher and games are not exempt nor should they be. Your link says:

Consumer Prices in Australia are 43.72% higher than in United States

Well that's awesome for them considering their min wage is more than 100% higher than the US.

Now we are looking at GOG games being 3 times more expensive in the US than in Australia. Is that what you would call fair and equal pricing?
My point was merely that you can't complain that another area has higher minimum wage without taking into account their cost of living as well, otherwise you're comparing apples to oranges. Once you start making fair comparisons, then you can start arguing that minimum wage should be raised in a particular region.

Using my previous examples, despite New York having a higher minimum wage than Iowa, maybe it still needs to be raised even further in New York, and maybe the cost of living in Iowa is low enough that it doesn't need to be raised there.
 

fix-the-spade

New member
Feb 25, 2008
8,639
0
0
Good for GoG, sometimes not being the big guy is a good thing for everybody.


Irridium said:
Meanwhile, on Steam and Origin "games are more expensive for you? Tough shit, deal with it fucker."
With the Titanfall release I've again been confronted with lots and lots of people using VPNs and other underhand tricks to get games from international versions of stores looking for the lowest price.

This happened for BF4 and seems to be becoming increasingly common, I wonder how much money EA stand to 'lose' from all those people paying £20 instead of £45 and if it makes a significant dent in their sales revenue versus the projections.

Whether it's stuff like this or when Spore became the most pirated game of the year it appears to me that when publishers take a 'deal with it' attitude, the public at large does exactly that and the publisher never comes off best. It's had an interesting effect on official channels too, Titanfall is already at £30 (less with a discount code) on some online stores (proper Euro based ones) and it's not even out yet.
 

Kathinka

New member
Jan 17, 2010
1,141
0
0
fix-the-spade said:
Good for GoG, sometimes not being the big guy is a good thing for everybody.


Irridium said:
Meanwhile, on Steam and Origin "games are more expensive for you? Tough shit, deal with it fucker."
With the Titanfall release I've again been confronted with lots and lots of people using VPNs and other underhand tricks to get games from international versions of stores looking for the lowest price.

This happened for BF4 and seems to be becoming increasingly common, I wonder how much money EA stand to 'lose' from all those people paying £20 instead of £45 and if it makes a significant dent in their sales revenue versus the projections.

Whether it's stuff like this or when Spore became the most pirated game of the year it appears to me that when publishers take a 'deal with it' attitude, the public at large does exactly that and the publisher never comes off best. It's had an interesting effect on official channels too, Titanfall is already at £30 (less with a discount code) on some online stores (proper Euro based ones) and it's not even out yet.
i doubt that people used VPNs for titanfall to get it for the cheapest price. it's not region locked, so you can just merrily buy and activate a key from the CIS dirt cheap with no problem.
people did, however, use VPNs a lot to play the game a few days earlier, but no one is losing a single cent over that.
 

flying_whimsy

New member
Dec 2, 2009
1,077
0
0
Glad to see GoG going the other way on that; regional pricing isn't going to change on its own: it'll take a much larger consumer effort.

On an aside, there were a lot of typos in that article.
 

1Life0Continues

Not a Gamer, I Just Play Games
Jul 8, 2013
209
0
0
WeepingAngels said:
Flat rate pricing isn't fair and equal.

I just learned the other day that the min wage in Australia is close to $18 while our min wage in the US is $7.25. That means that an equal price for both countries would see Australians getting a $20 game in a little over an hour of work while in the US it would take us 3 hours. In short, it would make the game 3 times as expensive in the US.

I guess the squeaky wheel gets the grease though and there are no shortage of Australians squeaking about having to pay $100 for a new release.
"The national minimum wage is currently $16.37 per hour or $622.20 per 38 hour week."

[Source: http://www.fairwork.gov.au/resources/fact-sheets/conditions-of-employment/pages/minimum-wages-fact-sheet.aspx#current-national-minimum-wage-order]

This is actually just the mandated minimum wage for those over the age of 18, without an arranged award by their employer. In truth, with most employers preferring award wages, the minimum wage is closer to around $15 an hour. So whoever gave you that figure has their facts straight up wrong.

This also doesn't take into account Australia's MUCH higher tax rate for average earners of $3,572 + 37c for each dollar over $37,000. With an average yearly wage of $50,000, you do the math.
[Source: http://www.ato.gov.au/Rates/Individual-income-tax-rates/]

And as noted by others, cost of living is much higher here BECAUSE of our higher wages. It's all in line generally. However the price markup of upwards of 60% on games alone (based entirely on exchange rates and accounting for inflation) is not justifiable in the slightest except as gouging. So much so that the the Consumer Commission here in Australia brought several major publishers to bear on why this differential exists. They found it was simply a matter of greed.

So yes, while wages ARE higher here, it is NOT in a vaccuum, and it STILL does not account for the massive price differential of upwards of 60%.

No, flat price worldwide is fair. Because no matter where you are in the world, all you pay is the exchange. And THAT is why people are happy about this.
 

Amir Kondori

New member
Apr 11, 2013
932
0
0
You know by disallowing regional pricing they are limiting their library, as publishers insist on regional pricing. I personally would prefer a larger available library than no regional pricing.
 

Amir Kondori

New member
Apr 11, 2013
932
0
0
1Life0Continues said:
WeepingAngels said:
Flat rate pricing isn't fair and equal.

I just learned the other day that the min wage in Australia is close to $18 while our min wage in the US is $7.25. That means that an equal price for both countries would see Australians getting a $20 game in a little over an hour of work while in the US it would take us 3 hours. In short, it would make the game 3 times as expensive in the US.

I guess the squeaky wheel gets the grease though and there are no shortage of Australians squeaking about having to pay $100 for a new release.
"The national minimum wage is currently $16.37 per hour or $622.20 per 38 hour week."

[Source: http://www.fairwork.gov.au/resources/fact-sheets/conditions-of-employment/pages/minimum-wages-fact-sheet.aspx#current-national-minimum-wage-order]

This is actually just the mandated minimum wage for those over the age of 18, without an arranged award by their employer. In truth, with most employers preferring award wages, the minimum wage is closer to around $15 an hour. So whoever gave you that figure has their facts straight up wrong.

This also doesn't take into account Australia's MUCH higher tax rate for average earners of $3,572 + 37c for each dollar over $37,000. With an average yearly wage of $50,000, you do the math.
[Source: http://www.ato.gov.au/Rates/Individual-income-tax-rates/]

And as noted by others, cost of living is much higher here BECAUSE of our higher wages. It's all in line generally. However the price markup of upwards of 60% on games alone (based entirely on exchange rates and accounting for inflation) is not justifiable in the slightest except as gouging. So much so that the the Consumer Commission here in Australia brought several major publishers to bear on why this differential exists. They found it was simply a matter of greed.

So yes, while wages ARE higher here, it is NOT in a vaccuum, and it STILL does not account for the massive price differential of upwards of 60%.

No, flat price worldwide is fair. Because no matter where you are in the world, all you pay is the exchange. And THAT is why people are happy about this.
You quote the national minimum wage, but that min. wage is higher in certain parts of Australia. In any case it is still more than double the min. wage in the US.
 

Amir Kondori

New member
Apr 11, 2013
932
0
0
BigTuk said:
StewShearer said:
GOG Returning "To Its Roots" After Regional Pricing Backlash


GOG will has reaffirmed its desire to "fight for games with flat worldwide pricing."

This didn't go over too well with many of the site's customers who, over the past few weeks, have left thousands of comments with expressing their unhappiness with the move. That in mind, GOG has recently revealed it will "getting back to [its] roots" and will take steps to restore its practice of "flat worldwide pricing."
And they are going to do exactly what about that? Seriously people... Regional pricing is not something retailers want anymore than you do...it's something that is forced upon them by various governments. You want to set up shop in a given country.. you have to play by that country's rules. Even Amazon can't get around that.

STeam can't get around it either. IT's not like they pocket the price difference, that price difference goes straight into the tax coffers. They'd be happy with flat pricing. It would simplify their bookkeeping tremendously.
Regional pricing has nothing to do with local governments. It is the publishers who want to charge what the market will bear in order to maximize their revenue.

Personally I have nothing against that.
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
GOG realized its mistake and went on and apologized and went back to normal pricing. Had this happened with any other publisher they would have strut around confused, tell us that we "just dont get it" and that we should "Deal with it" and continue to rape us with prices.


Amir Kondori said:
You know by disallowing regional pricing they are limiting their library, as publishers insist on regional pricing. I personally would prefer a larger available library than no regional pricing.
then you are part of the problem why we cant have fair trade. as long as you are unable to stand for equal treatment - there wont be any. Its like those people that preorder games liek colonial marines and then go on to preorder the same publishers games again.

WeepingAngels said:
Flat rate pricing isn't fair and equal.

I just learned the other day that the min wage in Australia is close to $18 while our min wage in the US is $7.25. That means that an equal price for both countries would see Australians getting a $20 game in a little over an hour of work while in the US it would take us 3 hours. In short, it would make the game 3 times as expensive in the US.

I guess the squeaky wheel gets the grease though and there are no shortage of Australians squeaking about having to pay $100 for a new release.
Yes it is. Just because your economy is worse than another countries does not mean they have to pay more. Just because they CAN pay more does not mean they should they should pay just as much for the same product. In fact in cases like Titanfall they are getting inferior product - no local servers exist.