It's the kids trying to be adults. This is generally what kids do when they enter puberty; That awkward stage when you're no longer a kid anymore, but you're not an adult yet either. They feel the need to rush into it because of hormones, but they're still thinking like children. The movie displays this very well, with both of them trying to dance sexy and inact in what they think is a physical relationship, all the while being extremely self conscious about it.Gorfias said:I'll have to see this and see if I like it as much as his "Moon Rise Kingdom."
he has young 12-13 year olds exploring first love and it is charming but! The actors really are very young. This movie is sexualizing them. I found that troubling.
I don't agree. I don't think it is supposed to be awkward and uncomfortable to watch. I think it's supposed to be charming. I was charmed. Then I started thinking these kids really are kids, doing and saying things that are awkward and uncomfortable for them when this sort of thing really happens in private. But this wasn't private, it was film. Public.Casual Shinji said:It's the kids trying to be adults. This is generally what kids do when they enter puberty; That awkward stage when you're no longer a kid anymore, but you're not an adult yet either. They feel the need to rush into it because of hormones, but they're still thinking like children. The movie displays this very well, with both of them trying to dance sexy and inact in what they think is a physical relationship, all the while being extremely self conscious about it.Gorfias said:I'll have to see this and see if I like it as much as his "Moon Rise Kingdom."
he has young 12-13 year olds exploring first love and it is charming but! The actors really are very young. This movie is sexualizing them. I found that troubling.
It's supposed to be awkward and kinda uncomfortable to watch.
I can see what you're getting at, but I'd wager studios generally have proper a safeguard in place to make sure nothing goes over the line. And that measures are followed to shoot scenes like this way differently then how they appear on screen. I'm sure Hollywood does anyway, being as PC as it is.Gorfias said:I don't agree. I don't think it is supposed to be awkward and uncomfortable to watch. I think it's supposed to be charming. I was charmed. Then I started thinking these kids really are kids, doing and saying things that are awkward and uncomfortable for them when this sort of thing really happens in private. But this wasn't private, it was film. Public.
Thankfully, I don't think this is meant for pedo types. I just hope Wes hasn't robbed these kids of something that will likely eventually happen for them and turned the private into public while making us complicit for watching.
I forget which Zero Punctuation it was, but in it Yahtzee described the game he was talking about and it's creator by waving his hands around and saying "QUIRKYYYYYYYYY!" That's what I think is the level of quirkiness you're describing.Scrumpmonkey said:I'm kind of on the fence about Anderson; his work can alternate between joyously brilliant and almost unwatchably self satisfied. I think the hipster phenomenon encapsulated what many find irritating about some of his work, it is meticulously eccentric. Its 'quirk and charm' can feel wholly artificial. A kind of "Look at me! Look at how hilariously clever and quirky i am! Oh so much quirk" It can quickly get a bit much. If some of his movies had a face i would punch them.
They are PC. They even note when they take special efforts not to let even animals get hurt. They sometimes don't know where the line is though. Probably the most troubling movie ever was "Pretty Baby". Great film, but has nude scenes with Brooke Shields when she was like, 12 or something. Her own mom was her agent at that time and said something to the effect that if all this messes her kid up, "oh well." Big media has a thing about sexualizing young people. Top models are often in their young teens. (creating unfair expectations of what a 40 year old woman should look like.) Heck, Billy Ray Cyrus was in arguably inappropriate pics with his own kid. He now says he regrets that.Casual Shinji said:I can see what you're getting at, but I'd wager studios generally have proper a safeguard in place to make sure nothing goes over the line. And that measures are followed to shoot scenes like this way differently then how they appear on screen. I'm sure Hollywood does anyway, being as PC as it is.
Do not forget not to confuse Wes Anderson for Wes Craven too! See the SNL clip in the post at the beginning of this thread. I though it pretty dang funny.Andy of Comix Inc said:Don't do what I do, guys. Don't mistake Paul W. S. Anderson and Wes Anderson.
Of course, no-one knows for sure that the W. S. doesn't stand for WeS... and have you ever seen them in the same room at the same time? Eh? Didn't think so.