Infinity Ward Merging With Neversoft to Form Single "Super Studio"

Alex Co

New member
Dec 11, 2013
1,183
0
0
Infinity Ward Merging With Neversoft to Form Single "Super Studio"


Parent company Activision will be merging Infinity Ward with Neversoft into a single "super studio;" with the Neversoft name set to be retired.

Publisher Activision will be merging Call of Duty studio Infinity Ward with Neversoft -- former developers of the Tony Hawk Pro Skater franchise. This studio shakeup has been revealed in an internal Activision memo obtained by Giant Bomb. [http://www.giantbomb.com/articles/infinity-ward-neversoft-merging-into-single-super-studio/1100-4909/] Written by Activision CEO of Publishing Eric Hirshberg, it mentions that the both studios will be called Infinity Ward after the merger since it's the "sensible choice," and that between these two studios, Hirshberg thinks a single "super studio" could emerge.


As you know, Neversoft and Infinity Ward teamed up for the development of Call of Duty: Ghosts...And through that process, it became clear that the two studios have very complementary skill sets. Between these two excellent studios, it seemed like a single 'super-studio' could emerge.

As already mentioned, we are merging these two very talented teams and obviously had to choose a name for the combined studio. Since the Infinity Ward brand is indelibly tied to the Call of Duty franchise, it is the sensible choice. While it will be strange to not see the Neversoft logo on future games, the important things--which are the Neversoft team's talent, creativity, professionalism and commitment to creative excellence--all remain unchanged as part of this new chapter.

The man leading this new super studio will be Dave Stohl, the current executive VP of worldwide studios for Activision. Current Infinity Ward chief Steve Ackrich will remain at Infinity Ward in a leadership role. What this new Infinity Ward team will be developing hasn't been disclosed in the memo, but given IW's track record, it's safe to surmise that it will once again be an entry into the Call of Duty franchise. As for Neversoft, even before the merger, it has already helped out in past Call of Duty games and has even helped Infinity Ward in releasing its latest game, Call of Duty: Ghosts.

Is this the start of a trend of more internal Activision studios being tapped or merged to develop more Call of Duty games? With Infinity Ward, Treyarch and Sledgehammer Games solely focused on creating entries in the shooter franchise, let's hope not for variety's sake.

In the latest Call of Duty news, the latest game will be called Call of Duty: Advance Warfare and will star actor Kevin Spacey. [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/escapist-news-now/9146-Call-of-Duty-Advanced-Warfare-Announced-Featuring-Kevin-Spacey]

Source: Giant Bomb [http://www.giantbomb.com/articles/infinity-ward-neversoft-merging-into-single-super-studio/1100-4909/]

Permalink
 

omega 616

Elite Member
May 1, 2009
5,883
1
43
This is going to be a slaughter!

A lot of people are going to get laid off and for what? To make yet another game in a series that has been dying for at least 2 iterations now? People were groaning at black ops 2 and I believe ghosts was the first to not out perform the last game, are they really merging two studios into one to Nintendo another COD out the door?

I mean the big piece of news about this game isn't that their is a new one but that it has Kevin Spacey in it! Gives a fuck? Not the first time a celeb has been in a game but that is the most exciting thing about COD now.
 

CriticalMiss

New member
Jan 18, 2013
2,024
0
0
So a studio that is a lifeless shadow of its former self is being folded in to another studio that is a lifeless shadow of its former self? Given the franchise milking experience between the two it's like a pair of black holes colliding, no IP will ever escape their deadly pull.
 

Ferisar

New member
Oct 2, 2010
814
0
0
CriticalMiss said:
So a studio that is a lifeless shadow of its former self is being folded in to another studio that is a lifeless shadow of its former self? Given the franchise milking experience between the two it's like a pair of black holes colliding, no IP will ever escape their deadly pull.
Two black holes colliding is first met by a fairly massive release of energy, so if we're going to take this metaphor anywhere, they may make something amazing first :p (You can call the black hole merger "The Spacey") EDIT: And then I read up on what happens, and then the "massive lay-offs" prediction makes it way more funny.

But yeah really I don't know if we need more CoD guys. I get that you're making cyclical development studio rounds to keep the annual release schedule, but come on!
 

Sigmund Av Volsung

Hella noided
Dec 11, 2009
2,999
0
0
YAY!

MORE INCONSISTENCY IN DESIGN!

Perhaps I should give them the benefit of the doubt, but CoD Ghosts was shit, even by CoD standards.


Who here wants to bet that this was shown at their merger meeting?
 

fix-the-spade

New member
Feb 25, 2008
8,639
0
0
I read a lot of waffle about efficiency and professionalism, but my brain registered only this.

Infinity Ward!
#Click#
You have outlived your usefulness
#BANG#
Neversoft! You are Infinity Ward now, do not fail me...

One of those inevitibilities of working for a big publisher, hit every time or be struck off the budget. Oh well, nobody of talent will be lost (beyond every single person who will likely be fired)...
 

MCerberus

New member
Jun 26, 2013
1,168
0
0
Meanwhile at EA:

"That reminds me, we haven't put any more studios on the corpse pile in the last 15 minutes. Is there any way we could buy Gearbox?"
 

Citizen Graves

New member
Jul 19, 2011
55
0
0
Am I the only one who thinks that if Activision goes the 3 developers route they should split them up into SP, MP and Coop developers who collaborate for yearly iterations of these singular game-mode-pillars, rather than have yearly design inconsistencies in each and every one of them?


I mean, sure, I like variety as much as the next guy, but having to adapt to 3 completely different game design choices with each and every iteration is kind of a pain.
Well, it certainly is in MP. But looking back at Ghosts, the main reason why I skipped that game was that the campaign did not take any inspiration from Treyarchs additions in BLOPS 2 (custom loadout, multiple choices, etc.).
I haven't thought this through too much, tbh, but then again I'm not a head-honcho at Activision.....


Also, I get that it is easy to hate the CoD-franchise, I really do, having dished out hate for the crap that was MW2, MW3 and Ghosts (having enjoyed only the Treyarch games, besides the original CoD's 1,2 and 4 by "real IW") but I don't get where people take this "dying franchise" talk from. the CoD-Franchise is as much in it's dying breath as this galaxy's sun.
 

Citizen Graves

New member
Jul 19, 2011
55
0
0
Ronack said:
I can't be the only one who thought: "Call of Duty: GUN"

Because, come on.

Tagline: "It really was ... a wild, wild west"

If there must be a giant spider in the third act then CoD is the place to feature it.
 

CriticalMiss

New member
Jan 18, 2013
2,024
0
0
Ferisar said:
CriticalMiss said:
So a studio that is a lifeless shadow of its former self is being folded in to another studio that is a lifeless shadow of its former self? Given the franchise milking experience between the two it's like a pair of black holes colliding, no IP will ever escape their deadly pull.
Two black holes colliding is first met by a fairly massive release of energy, so if we're going to take this metaphor anywhere, they may make something amazing first :p
That release of energy would just be the marketing for the next game. These days it seems they put more effort in to advertising the game than actually making it.
 

Hairless Mammoth

New member
Jan 23, 2013
1,595
0
0
Citizen Graves said:
Am I the only one who thinks that if Activision goes the 3 developers route they should split them up into SP, MP and Coop developers who collaborate for yearly iterations of these singular game-mode-pillars, rather than have yearly design inconsistencies in each and every one of them?
Two or three developers split between campaign and MP and starting out fresh on a new game together probably will never work. It reminds me of Sonic Extreme and how different teams made the normal and boss level engines. The Sega execs looked at the one that was visibly more polished(but by no means complete)and told the other team to use that engine, too, throwing away months of work on a perfectly functional mechanic. I could imagine developers working under Activision going slightly different routes in design, then finding out Activision wants only one and throws out half of the work done on a game. They'd have to basically function as one team. Neversoft and IW are located in LA, so this might be why Activision chose to merge these two. Plus having 3 developers on one game means they won't get the one game a year CoD factories they want since planning and art design will take up the time of all three before they can really get started.
Also, I get that it is easy to hate the CoD-franchise, I really do, having dished out hate for the crap that was MW2, MW3 and Ghosts (having enjoyed only the Treyarch games, besides the original CoD's 1,2 and 4 by "real IW") but I don't get where people take this "dying franchise" talk from. the CoD-Franchise is as much in it's dying breath as this galaxy's sun.
It doesn't help them that the series has been stagnating since MW2. Sure, Treyarch got out of WW2 shooters with Black Ops[footnote]Though, I think World at War was a good sendoff to an overdone genre.[/footnote]and caught up to IW's more modern take on CoD. But, they all felt the same since MW1 and not in a good way. Activsion shouldn't have been "more CoD, more CoD" because it watered down their money making franchise. Besides Nazi Zombies, the MP didn't seem to change much. CoD probably isn't dying, but it could be turning into a Franchise Zombie [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FranchiseZombie] if this upcoming Sledgehammer one turns out to be a dud and this "new" Infinity Ward's or Treyach's next one don't deliver. Activision might take the least successful developer behind the barn with the old rifle and feed the remains to whichever developer is nearby.
 

Frezzato

New member
Oct 17, 2012
2,448
0
0
I missed out on the whole internet outcry about Infinity Ward "back in the day" and can't seem to find any reliable sources covering exactly what happened. Can anyone here give me some links to impartial information? I don't exactly trust Wikipedia.
 

oldtaku

New member
Jan 7, 2011
639
0
0
'Super' studio? Based on the last game they made together (Ghosts) it's a new Thoroughly Mediocre Studio.
 

-Dragmire-

King over my mind
Mar 29, 2011
2,821
0
0
"Doctor, I took a pill and now I'm Neversoft! What do I do?"

"Nurse, send him to the Infinity Ward, stat!"

OT: I expect some layoffs from the merger, which is sad.
 

Vegosiux

New member
May 18, 2011
4,381
0
0
Super studio? Can it lift a building in a single bound? Should have a cape, at least. Not having high hopes for it otherwise.
 

Vivi22

New member
Aug 22, 2010
2,300
0
0
Super studio?

Sure. Because that's how these mergers work. Even better to do it when neither studio has any of their old magic left.
 

Frezzato

New member
Oct 17, 2012
2,448
0
0
Kalezian said:
Thank you. I held my breath and went back to Wikipedia and it wasn't that bad actually, although it's still fairly confusing. At the very least I can say that on the Wikipedia page I learned of Robert Bowling's new game Human Element, which is *sigh* a zombie apocalypse game, but at least it sounds like they're planning on introducing new gameplay elements.