LOLCorrectAndDone said:Other notable mention includes the USS Iowa as being the only ship at the time that had a bathtub.
The writing was on the wall for the big gun surface combatant by the time Yamato was commissioned.oldtaku said:I learned this from playing Kantai Collection, so grain of salt, but apparently the Yamato was so secret that most Japanese never heard about it till after WWII and it didn't see much service at all from Midway until Leyte Gulf and they tried real hard to keep it out of action (it was nicknamed 'Hotel Yamato' among Navy personnel who knew about it). The big famous ones were Kaga, Nagato, etc.
Only after the war and reconstruction, when the details came out, did it become the media darling in Japan it is today.
No, I think it was installed for then president Franklin D. Roosevelt when he was travelling aboard.Rhykker said:LOLCorrectAndDone said:Other notable mention includes the USS Iowa as being the only ship at the time that had a bathtub.
Awesome. Please tell me her nickname was the USS Bathtub.
Along similar lines, the USS New Jersey is the only battleship to have had two swimming pools onboard. Apparently when they took out the anti-aircraft guns mounted on the deck, the captain ordered the crew to fill the circular holes left behind with water, and they went swimming.CorrectAndDone said:Other notable mention includes the USS Iowa as being the only ship at the time that had a bathtub.
You're actually underselling how much of an EPIC FAIL the Yamato was.Barbas said:The area of the sea ruled by the Yamato pretty much consists of the home ports it was anchored in. It never fired its guns on another battleship, instead going into combat against light destroyers escorts and carriers. In 1945, it was dispatched on a one-way trip to Okinawa, with the intention being for it to fight to the bitter end - beaching itself and acting as a stationary gun platform if necessary. It was spotted south of Kyushu and ignominiously sunk by torpedo bombers, with the loss of most of its crew, before it could reach its target.
Typical pop military article, especially the last.Rhykker said:7 Famous Warships That Ruled the Modern Seas
What are the most famous warships of the 20th century?
Read Full Article
She was kept for the Decisive Battle which never came with the US. She was built solely for that battle and was considered too important to risk otherwise and Japan lacked the fuel to use her for more than that anyway. The Battle off Samar took place long after the Japanese realized that and were struggling to find anything to keep throwing at the USN.You're actually underselling how much of an EPIC FAIL the Yamato was.
That battle against light destroyers and escort carriers, that was the Battle Off Samar.
Japan:4 battleships (Including the Yamato),6 heavy cruisers,2 light cruisers,11 destroyers.
America: 6 escort carriers, 3 destroyers, 4 destroyer escorts.
Note that an Escort Carrier is to a Fleet Carrier as a Scooter is to a Humvee.
Result: the Yamato runs away! 3 heavy cruisers sunk. American Victory.
This was the only time the Yamato fired on a surface ship.
Were this a list of the greatest 18th or 19th Century warships most, if not all, would be British. Britain had an unparallelled streak of victories and ships which fought in those victories in the 18th Century to the near utter exclusion of other nations. Britannia did rule the waves - by the late 1810s more than half of ALL the worlds shipping was British and that was because the RN had sunk, captured or driven much of the remainder into port to allow their merchant marine to have a near monopoly on much of the worlds trade.A bit...American centric?
Any U-boat? They it could be argued for a very brief time in history terrorised the seas.
Edit: Oops, didn't read the 20th century bit. My bad. The U-boats still count though!
DreadnOught!Your choice of Dreadnaught was most fitting as it changed the face of naval warfare in the early years of the 20th century.
Her use, like the rest of the surface fleet, was for being a fleet in being. They were a waste of money thanks to Hitler starting the war earlier than expected and were misused as raiders which were not cost-effective and saw little meaningful action or doing very little impact beyond tying down large amounts of the RN to keep watch on them, something that a warship which "ruled the seas" does not do.Prinz Eugen - Bismark's consort during it's famous run. Was part of the famous channel dash. A phenomenal cruiser in her own right. Survived the war and was even sailed back to the US as a war prize by her own crew. Survived two nuclear bomb blasts before finally capsizing in the Kwajalein Atoll while the wreck was under tow. Compared to Bismarck, she had a a far more illustrious career. Other ships to read up on your own that did far more than Bismarck; Gneisenau and Sharnhorst, and the pocket battleships of the Deutschland class.
Her only major mark is being the first supercarrier built. Essex and her class laid the foundation for the the dominance of US supercarriers during and after WWII.But one ship, post war, that almost every US navy vet knows, it is the USS Forrestal (CVA-59).
Texas had very little value after WWI beyond her importance as being a museum today. She and New York were badly out of date, rolled too sharply to fire accurately and were regulated to secondary duties after WWI when the Standards were all built.If you want old war horses, even older than Arizona or the battleline at Pearl... look no further than USS Texas, the oldest surviving dreadnaught battleship... predating WWI and even HMS Hood.
Then look at her sister Washington and see what she accomplished in the Solomons, sneaking up on Kirishima ripping her apart as the Japanese squadron was busy focusing on South Dakota who'd lost power and was unable to use her electronics and guns.Like North Carolina, go see this ship in person. This ship deserves as much if not more recognition than an over glorified floating AA battery (the Iowa class) that got lucky and picked for surrender ceremonies (Missouri in particular).
She was built to protect the Soviet boomer sanctuaries by suicidally flinging herself at US carrier battlegroups and discharging her missiles before she was sunk. She and her class have accomplished little since the end of the Cold War and certainly not dominated the ocean. Nothing in the Russian and Soviet Fleets counts as significant as something from the RN, USN, or IJN because it always was the red headed step-child of the military arms beyond the attack boats and the nuclear deterrent.The Kirov. If you studied naval tactics or even have a cursory idea of what a major modern warship is during the 1970s and 1980s... this is it. This ship and her three sisters were the ships that scared America enough that we actually scraped up the Missouri class and put them back in service. This ships are monsters and rightly so. Yes, they never fired a shot in anger and only one still exists in service but this is a terrifying class and worth mentioning.
Typhoons early role was to act as a second strike against any surviving cities around the world and tied into the Soviets view that a nuclear exchange would a prolonged war which ran counter to the Western view of it being a shot in the dark. After that role was dropped they simply because typical Soviet boomers no different than any other. If you want to count an influential boomer class look to the first Soviet or American ones.The Typhoon. You can't mention modern sea terrors without mentioning the class that inspired the Red October. This is the boogy man of the 1980's. Sleek, dangerous, quiet, and indeed capable of putting far too many missiles and warheads to sea. Sure, almost all of them are gone into the pages of history but their mere existence drove the US submarine service to develop ever more capable machines, culminating in the 688i and Sea Wolf class SSNs to try and hunt and stop these terrifying machine
Well, I think it's because at the end of the day the US won the "modern" wars we're talking about, and we did become the dominant naval power, which we still sort of hold onto today.grey_space said:Hmmm....
A bit...American centric?
How about some more ancient ships of note?
The first ever Clipper? (can't remember a name)
The Padre Eterno, the biggest ever Galleon?
Any U-boat? They it could be argued for a very brief time in history terrorised the seas.
Edit: Oops, didn't read the 20th century bit. My bad. The U-boats still count though!
The award for unintentional comedy goes to Therumancer for saying something isn't American centric by giving an American centric answer. Of the 141 warships that fought at Jutland, how many were American? How about zero zip,zilch,zero. The number of American battleships that fired at a German Battleship in both WW1 and WW2. You guessed it zero. American destroyers played an active part in WW1 but they were under British overall command apart from 1 month when the British Admiral went on leave and gave command of the combined force to an American Admiral. The US navy did not win WW1.Therumancer said:Well, I think it's because at the end of the day the US won the "modern" wars we're talking about, and we did become the dominant naval power, which we still sort of hold onto today.
That said the big "lesson" I get from this is that you really shouldn't go around touting your ships as being a piece of national pride, and "invincible" it almost always seems to signal an embarrassing defeat or wreckage. The thing is that a lot of th ships here that were wrecked, The Bismarck, The Yamato, The Arizona, etc... probably owe a good part of their doom due to their own hype and promotion, making them morale targets if nothing else. Technically impressive, but as others have pointed out, they generally didn't go on to do much.
The Enterprise is notable for it's size (longest ship) but generally speaking seems more famous because of it's survival than because anyone was sitting around going "yeah, this makes us the shizznit of the seven seas". I mean I'm sure that happened to an extent being a carrier, but it wasn't "The Bismarck".
I agree this article is crap. No offense but mentioning only ships that maybe the average person can come up with in a pinch isn't worth the effort. Make a list that gives people some knowledge.beastro said:Typical pop military article, especially the last.Rhykker said:7 Famous Warships That Ruled the Modern Seas
What are the most famous warships of the 20th century?
Read Full Article
Dreadnought - Influential, yes.
Missouri - came too late, she was the last USS BB built.
Yamato - Sat around for most of the war due to excessive fuel use and being reserved for the Decisive Battle which never came.
Arizona - only claim to fame is what happened to her on Dec 7th.
Bismarck - hunted from the moment she first went into the open ocean and hunted to death. Her sister ship accomlished far more by sitting in fjords and tying down RN assets.
Hood - Yes, she was the golden child of the RN through the interwar period and the most balanced capital ship they had.
Enterprise - ...CV-65? Why the hell that when she was but one of many supercarriers, merely the first nuke carrier and not her predecessor which was the only thing standing again the whole IJN at times during the Pacific War???
Bloody hell....
Ok, let's go over this again!
Mikasa - Japanese flagship during the Russo-Japanese War during which Japan wiped out most of Russia's Baltic and East Asian Squadrons.
Dreadnought - see above.
Warspite - Most decorated and renown RN warship, the British equivalent of Enterprise. Always at key battles, racked up a high kill toll, held the line while many other British capital ships were sunk or too old to be effective.
Akagi, representing the Kido Butai as a whole. - The flagship of the Kido Butai and leader of the stroke on Pearl Harbour, allowed the IJN to dominate the Pacific for the first six months of the war and was their most flexible and lethal arm.
Enterprise (CV-6) - Only US carrier to constantly be in the thick of the Pacific War, holding the line single handedly at times, luckier with torpedoes than Saratoga, the only other Pacific carrier to survive the war. Most decortated and renown US warship in it's history and made Enterprise the name it is today in pop culture.
Essex CV-9 for her class ushering in US dominance in naval air power since June 6th 1942, her class and her numbers went on to become the core of the modern fleet and laid the groundwork for the supercarriers & Nautilus for ushering in the era of US nuke boats which are today's real dominate warship, both representing the USNs modern fleet, its influence and making it the second most powerful navy in history - They rule the waves and second only to the US nuclear deterrent have allowed them to maintain their global hegemony.
Honorable mentions - Illustrious for Taranto, Invincible for the Falklands War, Hood for her importance to British naval strategy in the Inter-War, Renown for taking over Hoods shoes and being the RNs fast hunter of German raiders.
Now, if these were ship classes, that would be a whole kettle of fish and include more submarines.
She was kept for the Decisive Battle which never came with the US. She was built solely for that battle and was considered too important to risk otherwise and Japan lacked the fuel to use her for more than that anyway. The Battle off Samar took place long after the Japanese realized that and were struggling to find anything to keep throwing at the USN.You're actually underselling how much of an EPIC FAIL the Yamato was.
That battle against light destroyers and escort carriers, that was the Battle Off Samar.
Japan:4 battleships (Including the Yamato),6 heavy cruisers,2 light cruisers,11 destroyers.
America: 6 escort carriers, 3 destroyers, 4 destroyer escorts.
Note that an Escort Carrier is to a Fleet Carrier as a Scooter is to a Humvee.
Result: the Yamato runs away! 3 heavy cruisers sunk. American Victory.
This was the only time the Yamato fired on a surface ship.
She was an unwise investment, but then again, Japan's insistence on pressing their war in China was the unwise investment which caused all the rest.
Were this a list of the greatest 18th or 19th Century warships most, if not all, would be British. Britain had an unparallelled streak of victories and ships which fought in those victories in the 18th Century to the near utter exclusion of other nations. Britannia did rule the waves - by the late 1810s more than half of ALL the worlds shipping was British and that was because the RN had sunk, captured or driven much of the remainder into port to allow their merchant marine to have a near monopoly on much of the worlds trade.A bit...American centric?
Any U-boat? They it could be argued for a very brief time in history terrorised the seas.
Edit: Oops, didn't read the 20th century bit. My bad. The U-boats still count though!
This trend continued up until the beginning of WWI and lull only passed when American accomplished a similar fleet by being the only one left standing with enough ships and enough money to maintain a large fleet by the end of the war.
The only navies which stood a chance a against the Anglo-American naval domination of the 20th Century were Imperial Germany Navy in WWI and the Imperial Japanese Navy in WWII and both were decimated by wars end, one from scuttling most of their own ships that were going to be taken from them anyway, the other one hunted into extinction by the United States Navy.
Since then they've been the only first rate navy with Britain bring crushed financially and the Soviet Union looking on their navy as a defensive assets, outside of their attack submarines, to protect the naval wing of the nuclear deterrent.
Which U-Boat then - individual subs do not stand out as much because there were many who didn't accomplish as much as capital ships did in the first half and in the second not many have had any action? As I said before, if this was a list of classes and types there'd be a lot more - the Type VII and the Gato Class would stand out off the top of my mind.
DreadnOught!Your choice of Dreadnaught was most fitting as it changed the face of naval warfare in the early years of the 20th century.
Her name does not contain a misspelled suffix for a sailor but means "nought" as in no, don't you don't need to.
Her use, like the rest of the surface fleet, was for being a fleet in being. They were a waste of money thanks to Hitler starting the war earlier than expected and were misused as raiders which were not cost-effective and saw little meaningful action or doing very little impact beyond tying down large amounts of the RN to keep watch on them, something that a warship which "ruled the seas" does not do.Prinz Eugen - Bismark's consort during it's famous run. Was part of the famous channel dash. A phenomenal cruiser in her own right. Survived the war and was even sailed back to the US as a war prize by her own crew. Survived two nuclear bomb blasts before finally capsizing in the Kwajalein Atoll while the wreck was under tow. Compared to Bismarck, she had a a far more illustrious career. Other ships to read up on your own that did far more than Bismarck; Gneisenau and Sharnhorst, and the pocket battleships of the Deutschland class.
Her only major mark is being the first supercarrier built. Essex and her class laid the foundation for the the dominance of US supercarriers during and after WWII.But one ship, post war, that almost every US navy vet knows, it is the USS Forrestal (CVA-59).
Texas had very little value after WWI beyond her importance as being a museum today. She and New York were badly out of date, rolled too sharply to fire accurately and were regulated to secondary duties after WWI when the Standards were all built.If you want old war horses, even older than Arizona or the battleline at Pearl... look no further than USS Texas, the oldest surviving dreadnaught battleship... predating WWI and even HMS Hood.
Then look at her sister Washington and see what she accomplished in the Solomons, sneaking up on Kirishima ripping her apart as the Japanese squadron was busy focusing on South Dakota who'd lost power and was unable to use her electronics and guns.Like North Carolina, go see this ship in person. This ship deserves as much if not more recognition than an over glorified floating AA battery (the Iowa class) that got lucky and picked for surrender ceremonies (Missouri in particular).
She was built to protect the Soviet boomer sanctuaries by suicidally flinging herself at US carrier battlegroups and discharging her missiles before she was sunk. She and her class have accomplished little since the end of the Cold War and certainly not dominated the ocean. Nothing in the Russian and Soviet Fleets counts as significant as something from the RN, USN, or IJN because it always was the red headed step-child of the military arms beyond the attack boats and the nuclear deterrent.The Kirov. If you studied naval tactics or even have a cursory idea of what a major modern warship is during the 1970s and 1980s... this is it. This ship and her three sisters were the ships that scared America enough that we actually scraped up the Missouri class and put them back in service. This ships are monsters and rightly so. Yes, they never fired a shot in anger and only one still exists in service but this is a terrifying class and worth mentioning.
Typhoons early role was to act as a second strike against any surviving cities around the world and tied into the Soviets view that a nuclear exchange would a prolonged war which ran counter to the Western view of it being a shot in the dark. After that role was dropped they simply because typical Soviet boomers no different than any other. If you want to count an influential boomer class look to the first Soviet or American ones.The Typhoon. You can't mention modern sea terrors without mentioning the class that inspired the Red October. This is the boogy man of the 1980's. Sleek, dangerous, quiet, and indeed capable of putting far too many missiles and warheads to sea. Sure, almost all of them are gone into the pages of history but their mere existence drove the US submarine service to develop ever more capable machines, culminating in the 688i and Sea Wolf class SSNs to try and hunt and stop these terrifying machine
No they didn't. The 688s were driven by the need for faster, more flexible subs to integrate into the growing desire in the USN for submarines to help escort carriers and better protect them from Soviet subs. The 688Is were an advancement on them to make slight improvements, add VLS tubes and make them better arctic boats.
Seawolf was a return to the older US trend of slower, quieter submarines only given a larger price sticker.
Excellent article, and a good read. Enjoyed it!Rhykker said:7 Famous Warships That Ruled the Modern Seas
What are the most famous warships of the 20th century?
Read Full Article