They could promise to not make any sequels.MovieBob said:An original epic space-opera from The Wachowskis -- what more reason do you need?
Dammit! I forgot all about Kung Fu Panda 3!Drake the Dragonheart said:The Movie I am most excited for is Kung Fu Panda 3! How will they top Gary Oldman's performance as Lord Shen? Can They?
The Incredible Hulk was already shit, so there's no worry of it being the first. There's a reason Iron Man, Captain America and Thor all get multiple sequels, while Hulk just had the actor replaced. Review scores in the low 60s, and box office less than double its budget which means it almost certainly lost money. I'll be very surprised if Marvel manage anything worse than that this year.jab136 said:please don't let this be the year of the first bad Marvel movie
I have to disagree with you, while Hulk definitely wasn't "good" it wasn't anywhere near "shit" I can think of plenty of much worse comic book movies, and Hulk is definitely watchable, even if it is definitely the worst marvel movie so far.Kahani said:The Incredible Hulk was already shit, so there's no worry of it being the first. There's a reason Iron Man, Captain America and Thor all get multiple sequels, while Hulk just had the actor replaced. Review scores in the low 60s, and box office less than double its budget which means it almost certainly lost money. I'll be very surprised if Marvel manage anything worse than that this year.jab136 said:please don't let this be the year of the first bad Marvel movie
I liked Incredible Hulk, and thought Norton was a better Banner than Ruffalo. I think Iron Man 2 and both Thors are the closest Marvel has come to missteps, and with Thor 2 in particular, it was damn close.Kahani said:The Incredible Hulk was already shit, so there's no worry of it being the first. There's a reason Iron Man, Captain America and Thor all get multiple sequels, while Hulk just had the actor replaced. Review scores in the low 60s, and box office less than double its budget which means it almost certainly lost money. I'll be very surprised if Marvel manage anything worse than that this year.jab136 said:please don't let this be the year of the first bad Marvel movie
I was actually very pleasantly surprised by the Thor movies, as I was not expecting much from them. The only misstep in the first one, in my opinion, was how quickly Thor got humble, or whatever term you want to apply. If he'd been on Earth for a few months or so, I might have bought it. Seeing as how it appeared to be just a few days, he went through too much of a personality shift too quickly. And I enjoyed the second Thor movie too.i4njw said:I liked Incredible Hulk, and thought Norton was a better Banner than Ruffalo. I think Iron Man 2 and both Thors are the closest Marvel has come to missteps, and with Thor 2 in particular, it was damn close.Kahani said:The Incredible Hulk was already shit, so there's no worry of it being the first. There's a reason Iron Man, Captain America and Thor all get multiple sequels, while Hulk just had the actor replaced. Review scores in the low 60s, and box office less than double its budget which means it almost certainly lost money. I'll be very surprised if Marvel manage anything worse than that this year.jab136 said:please don't let this be the year of the first bad Marvel movie