NinjaDeathSlap said:
spartan231490 said:
This is the stupidest thing I've ever read, and I'm actually a little upset that I wasted even the time it took to read the 5 bullet points.
Well, with feedback as fair and comprehensive as this, I know I can only get better. Thank you!
You, are a champ. Grace, humility and well deserved snark, I love it!
Regarding the article, I'd like to respond in depth:
1. Variety: Most of the sites like Netflix and Hulu Plus have the "Most popular/viewed" shows queue that are not biased towards you. There's also the idea that these things don't exist in a vacuum. "Hidden Gems" usually get mentioned by someone whose job it is to find it and as long as you're keeping an eye on those feeds you won't miss out on much.
Additionally, thanks to digital television most of us don't flip through the channels anymore anyways. We have a limited number of channels we like and we stick to them because there's hundreds and hundreds of others out there that we don't care to filter through. That's a problem with TV management now, not binge watching.
2. Not fitting other genres: I'm not sure how this is harmful to us. Are you indicating that in the future the genres that can't be binge watched won't be created at all? There are shows that I simply cannot or will not watch straight in a row. But I do watch all of them because they're good. I would think continued watching and binge watching would both be viewed in the same boat as long as the same number of shows are getting watched. Especially from a marketing perspective. Hell, right now binge watching damages ads because they keep getting replayed and the customer gets annoyed. Slow burn shows are better for that.
3. Can't keep up: This just means that we have less and less excuse to be bored with the shows we're watching. The only issue here would again be addictive personality or even completionism issues. This is the result of a growing industry. We have got to change this about ourselves, learn to let "keeping up" go except on the most important shows. The same is already becoming true for video games where there's no way to play ALL of them anymore.
4. Preservation: Crowd sourced data storage of entertainment (i.e. pirates) really makes this a null argument. The problem with old movies and even old games is that we didn't have anything so close to the amount of recording and storage space we have today.
Now, will some shows fall through the cracks? Yes. And those will be the utter garbage that no one cares about.
5. Anti-social: I binge watch shows when I'm alone. I don't binge watch shows when I have the opportunity to be with other people. So that point is more on the side of addictive television watching than necessarily on the side of "binge watching". For example, I go home for lunch sometimes. That's when I binge watched Archer. Now I just play a video game which is inherently no more better than had I been watching a show. Or, let's say my wife and I are home at night and the day is through. If there's a new show we found on Netflix or wherever we'll go ahead and binge watch it. In all honesty, watching television isn't a social thing in general. Now, I have found occasional gems where I've invited friends over to watch (e.g. Moone Boy, Idiot Abroad, etc.) and that has actually made them more social than TV watching ever was before.