Casual Developers Boycott Amazon

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
Casual Developers Boycott Amazon


Amazon's Reflexive [http://www.reflexive.com/index.php] casual gaming portal is causing controversy among many casual game developers, who feel that its $9.99 price point is too low and undermines the rest of the industry.

iWin [http://www.amazon.com], said he supports the $9.99 price point but that it should be held back for new games to give them the best possible opportunity to sell at higher prices first.

"We pulled all our games down from Amazon when we found out what they were doing," Hieke said, adding that Reflexive's current pricing policy is "completely unacceptable." That sentiment was echoed by executives from Oberon Media [http://www.sandlotgames.com/], one of whom described the pricing issue as "the elephant in the room."

But Reflexive Entertainment Chief Financial Officer Ernie Ramirez denied that Amazon was attempting to undercut the industry, saying, "It's our goal to bring a lot of new people to the space." And as App Store [http://venturebeat.com/2009/02/11/amazon-sparks-casual-games-pricing-controversy/], where games can be picked up for 99 cents or less.

That may be coming to an end, however; a rumor making the rounds at the conference suggests that Apple [http://www.apple.com] will begin setting its own prices for App Store products.


Permalink
 

garthgantu

New member
Aug 14, 2007
4
0
0
The 'rumors' of PopCap's 'pulling out' of Amazon's casual games offering are utterly inaccurate. How could we pull out of something we weren't a part of? We have an excellent relationship with Amazon, they sell our retail/boxed games at a solid clip and will continue to do so. We're not YET part of Amazon's casual gaming portal, but continue to discuss the prospect of becoming part of that program with Amazon.

Garth Chouteau
PR Director, PopCap Games
 

cyrus_zuo

New member
Jul 18, 2006
2
0
0
The word Boycott is incorrectly used in the title of this article/forum post, the story is also a bit misleading. (and as mentioned above in some ways the information mentioned is inaccurate)
 

GothmogII

Possessor Of Hats
Apr 6, 2008
2,215
0
0
Wait....9.99 is low? I wouldn't pay more than 5.00 for a casual game...and hey, I can get one whole full length game at a game store...granted those are mostly a couple of years old, but still, is any casual game worth that much?
 

Susan Arendt

Nerd Queen
Jan 9, 2007
7,222
0
0
GothmogII said:
Wait....9.99 is low? I wouldn't pay more than 5.00 for a casual game...and hey, I can get one whole full length game at a game store...granted those are mostly a couple of years old, but still, is any casual game worth that much?
Depends on your personal taste, of course, but I assure you, there are plenty of casual games that are well worth that price. "Casual" is not a synonym for "crap." (Again, I'm talking about actual game quality, not personal taste. If you don't like puzzle games, for example, even the best puzzle game in the world is going to be of little interest to you.)
 

Susan Arendt

Nerd Queen
Jan 9, 2007
7,222
0
0
Hankage said:
Yeah, but by definition, the whole point of a casual game is that <a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casual_game#Overview>you didn't pay a lot for it.
First of all, simply because someone decided to say so on Wikipedia, that doesn't mean that a low price is part of a casual game's definition. And really, $10 is hardly breaking the bank.