Interesting. I was really disappointed by Nuclear Throne's roughness but I loved the concept. So I might give this a go when I can afford it.Baresark said:It's more like Isaac meets Nuclear Throne. It has a deep system of synergistic effects like Isaac has, but it has the great gameplay of Nuclear Throne. Great game.
The synergy doesn't come into play often enough, I find. The review kind of mentioned it too. The RNG and very limited item opportunities generally seem to combine poorly.Baresark said:It's more like Isaac meets Nuclear Throne. It has a deep system of synergistic effects like Isaac has, but it has the great gameplay of Nuclear Throne. Great game.
Roughness? What do you consider roughness? Nuclear Throne is one of the most polished games in the world in terms of game design and feel.Cowabungaa said:Interesting. I was really disappointed by Nuclear Throne's roughness but I loved the concept. So I might give this a go when I can afford it.Baresark said:It's more like Isaac meets Nuclear Throne. It has a deep system of synergistic effects like Isaac has, but it has the great gameplay of Nuclear Throne. Great game.
In terms of game design, yes it's extremely solid. But it did really feel like a slightly fleshed out prototype. I can taste the GameMaker through it. It didn't help that because of that there was an issue with AMD graphical cards it ran very poorly when I bought it.Amir Kondori said:Roughness? What do you consider roughness? Nuclear Throne is one of the most polished games in the world in terms of game design and feel.
same thing happens in isaac tbh, where only some seeds are actually favorable to the point where you can make it all the way to the actual endSeth Carter said:The synergy doesn't come into play often enough, I find. The review kind of mentioned it too. The RNG and very limited item opportunities generally seem to combine poorly.Baresark said:It's more like Isaac meets Nuclear Throne. It has a deep system of synergistic effects like Isaac has, but it has the great gameplay of Nuclear Throne. Great game.
I enjoy the basic level of the gameplay, but 30 and change runs in, usually hitting third or fourth floor, and I've only managed to luck into an actual synergy once. Maybe twice if you consider boomerang+molotov launcher a synergy.
you could see the process in real time in starbound's development, where randomly generated worlds started off with no apparent means of player progression and massive dead zones with no purpose were refined over time to include more set pieces arranged in a meaningful order to provide a experience that the player actually wants, instead of merely being "different" for the sake of itCallate said:I think someone needs to hold a workshop or seminar for independent game authors on how it's possible to use RNG in your game without generating game worlds that are a waste of a player's time and that random/procedural generation, while arguably a good way to extend your game's longevity and available assets, is a terrible excuse for not balancing your game properly.
Any time a "rogue-like" generates a play session that causes a reasonable player to say "this would have been enjoyable if only the game had spawned 'x'/not spawned 'y'" is a place where the creator probably should have intervened and imposed a rule or two on the series of random tables that created their game world.
Even farther in now, rescuing NPCs does add more chances to get items. But they're often still in shop form. Shop form is a problem because the money is so broadly random. I've kept track for 25 runs now and its a range of 19-123 for the first floor. Which adds the double layer of both having to roll up decent, and ideally synergistic items, and having to roll the cash flow up to acquire them. Even chests often require buying extra keys, as keys seem to be the rarest drop even if you do steadily clear rooms in fashion to raise your Cool(luck) stat.weirdee said:same thing happens in isaac tbh, where only some seeds are actually favorable to the point where you can make it all the way to the actual endSeth Carter said:The synergy doesn't come into play often enough, I find. The review kind of mentioned it too. The RNG and very limited item opportunities generally seem to combine poorly.Baresark said:It's more like Isaac meets Nuclear Throne. It has a deep system of synergistic effects like Isaac has, but it has the great gameplay of Nuclear Throne. Great game.
I enjoy the basic level of the gameplay, but 30 and change runs in, usually hitting third or fourth floor, and I've only managed to luck into an actual synergy once. Maybe twice if you consider boomerang+molotov launcher a synergy.
I don't think I can disagree more with this. I've got over 700 hours into Nuclear Throne and I'm the kind of guy that pours thousands of hours into games. Nuclear Throne is a tight design from start to finish and I don't know if you've ranked or looped but Nuclear Throne is 100% the better designed game.Cowabungaa said:In terms of game design, yes it's extremely solid. But it did really feel like a slightly fleshed out prototype. I can taste the GameMaker through it. It didn't help that because of that there was an issue with AMD graphical cards it ran very poorly when I bought it.Amir Kondori said:Roughness? What do you consider roughness? Nuclear Throne is one of the most polished games in the world in terms of game design and feel.
Now that it's working well I'm having quite a bit of fun with it. But now that I also got Enter the Gungeon the feeling that Nuclear Throne is a fleshed out prototype hits me even more.