BioShock For PS3 Enhanced But Unchanged

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
BioShock For PS3 Enhanced But Unchanged


Bad news for BioShock [http://www.playstation.com] ending as the rest of us.

It's not all that terrible, really; BioShock did tail off near the end, with a conclusion that didn't live up to the promise of the overall game, but it was less a bad ending than just not as good as it should have been. Despite that, Melissa Miller of 2K Marin [http://www.2kmarin.com/], the senior producer on the PlayStation 3 version, said the studio wanted to "respect" the original game, and wouldn't be messing around with Ken Levine's story.

"When you get a chance to work on something that was really creative you get the temptation to redo things," she told MTV Multiplayer [http://multiplayerblog.mtv.com/2008/09/25/bioshock-ps3-ending-unchanged/]. "We chose not to."

There will be some additions to the PS3 release of the game, including a new difficulty level, exclusive downloadable content and new trophies, but the story, graphics and gameplay will remain exactly as they were in the Xbox 360 [http://www.xbox.com] version of the game. "The things we wanted to add were things that would complement what was created," Miller added.

BioShock was one of last year's biggest hits, but was criticized for its endgame, which devolved into a bog-standard boss fight and simplistic game endings that failed to reflect the game's otherwise nuanced plot and emphasis on moral choices. Levine himself admitted the flaws in an interview with Kotaku [http://kotaku.com/357273/levine-agrees-bioshocks-ending-failed], saying he was surprised at how strongly people reacted to it. "I underestimated, way underestimated, the impact the story was going to have on people," he said. "I didn't realize it would change people's perspective on what to expect from gameplay."

BioShock for the PlayStation 3 is scheduled for release on October 21.


Permalink
 

Aries_Split

New member
May 12, 2008
2,097
0
0
Was anyone actually expecting them to change something?

It's Bioshock. On the PS3.

Nothing more. Nothing less.
 
Dec 1, 2007
782
0
0
Indigo_Dingo post=7.72509.770998 said:
What the hell? How were the moral choices complex unless you were a psychopath? They are little girls. Who cry and run away from you. And weep over their fallen protectors and beg for their lives. The ending reflected the standard of the choices given.
Well scarcity of resources and all that. Do you become evil because you must, or risk death while maintaining your morality?
 

Cyclomega

New member
Jul 28, 2008
469
0
0
Indigo_Dingo post=7.72509.771027 said:
Imitation Saccharin post=7.72509.771019 said:
Indigo_Dingo post=7.72509.770998 said:
What the hell? How were the moral choices complex unless you were a psychopath? They are little girls. Who cry and run away from you. And weep over their fallen protectors and beg for their lives. The ending reflected the standard of the choices given.
Well scarcity of resources and all that. Do you become evil because you must, or risk death while maintaining your morality?
Considering death is a momentary inconvenience in all of it, and only becomes a factor when going for the Ultimate Survivor thing, the latter. That only becomes an arguable factor upon the Introduction of the new Survivor mode.
I think you minimize the impact of moral choices in the backstory, especially the audiologs and way the characters have evolved from "geniuses" to "monsters". Suchong's notes in the loading screens are creepy...

The moral aspect of the Little Sisters and the surprisingly manichaean endings, although a blow to the knee at the end of a wonderful game, are secondary to me compared to how Rapture went down the drain... There lies the greatness of the storytelling...

Anyway, don't pout and enjoy a wonderful game, I'm curious to see the new content, and I hope that Miss Miller (if she's also the director of BioShock 2) will stay true to the spirit of Ken Levine in the next one.
 

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
Imitation Saccharin post=7.72509.771019 said:
Well scarcity of resources and all that. Do you become evil because you must, or risk death while maintaining your morality?
The biggest problem with BioShock is that while it was supposed to be what you describe, it was in fact something quite different. I saved every single Little Sister in the game, and scarcity of resources was never an issue. I'm not going to complain about not having to hoard ammo, but the highly-touted "moral" aspect of the game was rendered entirely moot by the fact that you could kill the LSs and get all their Adam, or save them and get just slightly less. There was never a choice to make, because there was never any pressing need to kill even one of them; the only reason to choose that path would be a desire to play the game as an evil character, which is an awfully long way from killing them out of necessity.

Further, the game's two-pronged ending - you're either a genetically-enhanced Mother Theresa or you're Hitler reborn - is also completely disconnected from the complex morality and story the game promised. Kill one Little Sister at the beginning, and your actions over the balance of the game have zero impact on the ending: You're condemned to being Captain Evil. Not a big deal, because as I pointed out there's no good reason to kill any of them, but the point is that it's a pale shadow of what it should have been.

Which is still in no way anything but a strong recommendation to rush out and buy the game if you haven't already, or if you own a PS3 and have to wait for it. It's an amazingly atmospheric FPS, with a brilliant story (cheap ending notwithstanding) and absolutely must be played by any fan of the genre. It's just that good.
 

Eagle Est1986

That One Guy
Nov 21, 2007
1,976
0
0
Danzorz post=7.72509.771676 said:
Bioshock with a ps3 controller.
.............
No...
Bioshock 1.2 without a lead weighted controller, no biggie.

I think I'm gonna wait until I can find it for half price, I've got the 360 version and as there are only 'enhancements' and not 'additions' to the PS3 version, I don't think I can justify buying it again just yet. Hmmm... maybe I'll just rent it instead, go excuse to play through the game again.
 

Cyclomega

New member
Jul 28, 2008
469
0
0
Malygris post=7.72509.771667 said:
Imitation Saccharin post=7.72509.771019 said:
Well scarcity of resources and all that. Do you become evil because you must, or risk death while maintaining your morality?
The biggest problem with BioShock is that while it was supposed to be what you describe, it was in fact something quite different. I saved every single Little Sister in the game, and scarcity of resources was never an issue. I'm not going to complain about not having to hoard ammo, but the highly-touted "moral" aspect of the game was rendered entirely moot by the fact that you could kill the LSs and get all their Adam, or save them and get just slightly less. There was never a choice to make, because there was never any pressing need to kill even one of them; the only reason to choose that path would be a desire to play the game as an evil character, which is an awfully long way from killing them out of necessity.

Further, the game's two-pronged ending - you're either a genetically-enhanced Mother Theresa or you're Hitler reborn - is also completely disconnected from the complex morality and story the game promised. Kill one Little Sister at the beginning, and your actions over the balance of the game have zero impact on the ending: You're condemned to being Captain Evil. Not a big deal, because as I pointed out there's no good reason to kill any of them, but the point is that it's a pale shadow of what it should have been.

Which is still in no way anything but a strong recommendation to rush out and buy the game if you haven't already, or if you own a PS3 and have to wait for it. It's an amazingly atmospheric FPS, with a brilliant story (cheap ending notwithstanding) and absolutely must be played by any fan of the genre. It's just that good.
There is a weak excuse for this manicheism : Adam is the source for plasmid injection, but also an addictive mutagen, which supposedly makes you crave more from the first shot.
I admit it's weak and doesn't transpire when you plan, but that's how I interpret it...
Yet I still believe they had to wrap up an ending to release the game in time...
 
Dec 1, 2007
782
0
0
Malygris post=7.72509.771667 said:
The biggest problem with BioShock is that while it was supposed to be what you describe, it was in fact something quite different.
Although I'd say they gave it a fair shake, point taken.
 
Mar 26, 2008
3,429
0
0
Malygris post=7.72509.771667 said:
Imitation Saccharin post=7.72509.771019 said:
Well scarcity of resources and all that. Do you become evil because you must, or risk death while maintaining your morality?
The biggest problem with BioShock is that while it was supposed to be what you describe, it was in fact something quite different. I saved every single Little Sister in the game, and scarcity of resources was never an issue.
Exactly my thoughts!

Potential spoiler.
The teddy bears that you get with 200 Adam really make fully harvesting the little sisters unnecessary. Of course you don't know you'll be getting them to begin with but once you do, let the good times roll!

The good ending actually reduced me to tears, so I don't really see what people are complaining about in that regard.

The final boss battle was quite thrilling, if a little easy.
 
Mar 26, 2008
3,429
0
0
Indigo_Dingo post=7.72509.773076 said:
Programmed_For_Damage post=7.72509.773045 said:
The good ending actually reduced me to tears, so I don't really see what people are complaining about in that regard.
I think it was the insulting tone of it. It actively approached it as if you were a saint because you didn't butcher some little girls just cause you had the chance.
Good point. And you were the devil incarnate even if you did harvest only a few of them.
 

Sentient Muffin

New member
Mar 3, 2008
40
0
0
Programmed_For_Damage post=7.72509.773045 said:
Malygris post=7.72509.771667 said:
Imitation Saccharin post=7.72509.771019 said:
Well scarcity of resources and all that. Do you become evil because you must, or risk death while maintaining your morality?
The biggest problem with BioShock is that while it was supposed to be what you describe, it was in fact something quite different. I saved every single Little Sister in the game, and scarcity of resources was never an issue.
Exactly my thoughts!

Potential spoiler.
The teddy bears that you get with 200 Adam really make fully harvesting the little sisters unnecessary. Of course you don't know you'll be getting them to begin with but once you do, let the good times roll!

The good ending actually reduced me to tears, so I don't really see what people are complaining about in that regard.

The final boss battle was quite thrilling, if a little easy.
I'm with you. Although the good ending didn't "reduce me to tears" it was rather pleasant and compelling. The final boss fight WAS fun, just too easy if you know how the heck to use your plasmids.