Wow, I normally like Macleans and actually read it every now and then, but I read that articles and I just had to laugh. The first bit of it was actually about the boy and what happened, but the rest was a full on attack on the "evils" of video games filled with bullshit statistics, complete lack of undertsanding of video games, and alarmist fox worthy tone, and a blatantly obvious bias that I'm not used to from Macleans. I found it so hard to read but i went through it. Alls I could do was /facepalm. I know that anyone here would not be lured by the complete outrageousness of the article, but honestly I know that someone who dosn't really know anything about the subject but what they hear on the news is going to read that and be persuaded that it's all because of the video games.
And I mean honestly, if someone tries to overdose on pills, does that means that the pills caused them to overdose. If someone drives recklessly in a car, does that mean that cars are evil and made him become reckless? NO! Any sane person realizes that it's that a reckless person with a car will be reckless with the car. But because video games have such a low standing in the minds of much of society, they are seen as culprits anywhere that there is any connection.