Metacritic Making Changes To User Voting Process

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
Metacritic Making Changes To User Voting Process


Almost eight years after it launched, Metacritic [http://www.metacritic.com] is imposing changes to its user voting system in response to the stunning discovery that gamers can be jerks.

The site will be implementing two major changes to its structure in the near future, according to Metacritic Games Editor Mark Doyle: An "enhanced registration" process that will require users to provide more than just an email address in order to be granted voting privileges on the site, and eliminating the ability to vote on a game before it launches. The changes are a response to recent "ballot box stuffing" by users intent on making games look bad.

A Gears of War 2 [http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3171112], which hasn't even been released yet, has a Metascore of 94 while users have scored it only 3.5. The situation is so bad that Doyle posted a message on the Gears of War 2 page saying, "My advice for our faithful users is to focus your attention on the Metascore for this game and not the thousands of user votes, most of which have been submitted before said users have played the game. This is a gaming community, and if people want to stuff the ballot box, there's not much I can do at this point. When we upgrade the registration requirements for participation on the site in the near future, this type of thing won't happen."

"The founders were really interested in not having people sign up for a really huge registration process just so they can participate on the site," Doyle told 1Up. "Obviously that's been exploited."

The elimination of pre-release voting will come before the enhanced registration process is implemented, Doyle said. Metacritic may also look at ways of highlighting user reviews in the future, as it develops better ways of determining which of those reviews are legitimate. Until that happens, he suggested readers focus on the aggregate review scores when checking out games. "Our primary product is the critic score. That's what we control; that's what we can certify," he said.


Permalink
 

oneplus999

New member
Oct 4, 2007
194
0
0
another problem with their site is that they rank reviews by score, which means if you give a game a good rating, you will probably get more traffic from metacritic than you would otherwise. they really should do them based on a z-score relative to the magazines other ratings or something to account for the "on a scale of 7-10" magazines. and really just drop gamespot. does anyone take their rankings seriously after the kane & lynch fiasco?
 

sirdanrhodes

New member
Nov 7, 2007
3,774
0
0
"Gamers can be jerks", REALLY?! Why just last week I was playing with the most delightful 11 year old Americans that offered advice and actually helped me in team deathmatch(!)

Sorry, that was directed more at Metacritic rather than The Escapist news staff.
 

stompy

New member
Jan 21, 2008
2,951
0
0
About time. Seriously, it's about time they realised Murphy's Law (it is Murphy's Law, right?) on user-based reviews.