U.K. Complaint About Canadian Game Industry DENIED

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
U.K. Complaint About Canadian Game Industry DENIED


Despite its earlier tough talk, the U.K. government has admitted that tax breaks for videogame developers in Canada don't actually violate any WTO [http://www.wto.org/] regulations and that it has "no legal grounds" upon which to pursue the matter.

All the way back in 2007, Margaret Hodge, the U.K. Minister for Culture, Media and Sport threatened to Canadian High Commission [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/78440-U-K-Considers-WTO-Challenge-Over-Canadian-Development-Studios] said that it was willing to discuss the matter with the U.K. government but that it was confident the Canadian government was playing by the rules.

Turns out it was right: Tiga [http://www.gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=22250]. "We now know that there are no legal grounds on which to lodge a complaint."

Tiga has been calling [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/83627-Tiga-Renews-Calls-For-Tax-Break-in-U-K] for similar breaks for U.K.-based developers since before the government suggested it would pursue the matter with the WTO; at the time, Minister Hodge said it was "unlikely" the government would do so, but with this avenue now closed the group is once again raising the issue of increased support for game developers.

"Just as Australia, Canada, China, France, Singapore, South Korea and some American states help their games industries to grow through extensive tax breaks, so the U.K. government should back our games industry with a tax break for games production," Wilson said. "If you can't beat them, join them."

He claimed that a 20 percent tax break for developers would result in an additional $317 million investment in the industry, as well as the creation of up to 1600 jobs. "The government stands naked before the games industry, bereft of a credible fiscal policy with which to support the sector," he said. "This measure would cost HM Treasury £150 million ($216m) over five years - a fraction of the recent £100 billion ($144bn) taxpayer bailout of the UK banking system."

Making threats against other countries rather than supporting its own industry always seemed a bit wrong-headed to me, and with this news it looks even more like the government is trying to dodge, rather than address, the issue. But supporting its industry only makes sense; the success of Canadian studios notwithstanding, the U.K. recently moved past Japan to become the second-largest software market in the world. Videogames are big business, and failing to support its growth - and to get a piece of the action in the process - is a mistake.


Permalink
 

Lord_Panzer

Impractically practical
Feb 6, 2009
1,107
0
0
Well, I'm glad that's all cleared up.

Only question now is if the U.K. government is actually going to try to address the issue in a more constructive manner, or if it's just going to continue faffing about.
 

Wyatt

New member
Feb 14, 2008
384
0
0
Malygris said:
Making threats against other countries rather than supporting its own industry always seemed a bit wrong-headed to me, and with this news it looks even more like the government is trying to dodge, rather than address, the issue. But supporting its industry only makes sense; the success of Canadian studios notwithstanding, the U.K. recently moved past Japan to become the second-largest software market in the world. Videogames are big business, and failing to support its growth - and to get a piece of the action in the process - is a mistake.
Bingo, that about summs up my thinking on the topic in a nut shell.

though one thing DID pop into my head while reading this post twords the end though. $135,000 cost to the government PER job and only getting 1,600 jobs out of it seems a lil much.

im not thinking its a waste of money, im just thinking that there are much better ways to spend that $216,000,000 and create jobs. more jobs anyhow and withg a wider choice of employees. after all how many people are actualy qualified to work in the gameing industry as opposed to a road crew? and how many people will benifit from the gaming insudtry as opposed to having new roads to drive on. that kind of thing.

i just question what you get for what it costs, and is it the BEST deal out there for the cash. we are only talking about 200 million after all, but 200 million here and 200 million there and sooner or later your talking about REAL money.
 

MarsProbe

Circuitboard Seahorse
Dec 13, 2008
2,372
0
0
Lord_Panzer said:
Well, I'm glad that's all cleared up.

Only question now is if the U.K. government is actually going to try to address the issue in a more constructive manner, or if it's just going to continue faffing about.
It would be nice to think so, but alas, this is the UK government we are talking about. Aye, but to be serious, this is just something I can't see our government doing any time soon. Even if it wasn't so backward, the government really is to busy propping up our failing financial institutions and wrestling with greedy bank directors to be able to do anything else.

It would be nice to see the games industry getting some support in this part of the world though...
 

szaleniec1000

New member
Nov 11, 2008
196
0
0
Malygris said:
Making threats against other countries rather than supporting its own industry always seemed a bit wrong-headed to me, and with this news it looks even more like the government is trying to dodge, rather than address, the issue.
New Labour in a nutshell.
 

mattttherman3

New member
Dec 16, 2008
3,105
0
0
AWSOME! My country is actually giving tax breaks to something I consider important! GO CANADA YAY!