The $500 Gaming PC

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
The $500 Gaming PC


PC gaming takes a lot of knocks for being an expensive and complicated endeavor but with 500 bucks and a little time and patience, just about anyone can put together a very decent PC game system.

Most critics of PC gaming attack the platform on two fronts: Expense and complexity. A good video card costs more than an Maximum PC [http://www.xbox.com] shows, five C-notes will buy all the stuff you need to build a solid gaming PC and it doesn't take rocket appliances to put it all together.

There are limitations, of course; 500 bucks is a pretty tight budget for a gaming rig no matter how you look at it. The price doesn't include an operating system or a monitor, nor does it feature any high-end, enthusiast parts. The system is built around an Intel Pentium E5200 CPU, an ATI 4870 video card and two gigabytes of Crucial RAM sitting on an MSI motherboard. A 320 gigabyte Western Digital hard drive, Samsung DVD drive and a cheap Rosewill case and power supply round out the components.

The process of assembling the pieces is fairly straightforward and the article takes neophytes through it in clear, well-illustrated steps that require nothing more in the way of tools than a screwdriver. When all is said and done, users are left with a very respectable gaming platform: Not a top-of-the-line thoroughbred "tiny god" by any stretch, but a unit more than capable of pulling its weight in demanding environments.

How capable? The Maximum PC project was able to run the notorious hardware hog Crysis [http://games.ea.com/crysis/] in DirectX 9 mode, high detail at a resolution of 1900x1200, at 36 frames per second without stuttering. The system wouldn't run the game in DirectX 10 mode because the builders installed Windows XP instead of Windows Vista but as they noted, most people looking to build a PC in this price range are most likely going to be running XP anyway. "If you're a hardcore gamer who demands nothing less than DX10 gaming on 'Very High' detail, you probably aren't building a sub $800 machine," the article said.

500 bucks for a system that will let you edit photos, email your aunt, bring your work home from the office and play Crysis? That sounds like a pretty reasonable investment to me.

via: Ars Technica [http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2009/04/maximum-pcs-500-pc-certified-crysis-safe.ars]


Permalink
 

thenumberthirteen

Unlucky for some
Dec 19, 2007
4,794
0
0
Still. $500 is PS3 money. Not to mention the main reason I gave up following PC gaming; after a year or so you'll have to upgrade at least 1 part of it to play the latest game.
 

iggyus

New member
Apr 18, 2009
1,195
0
0
Well I paid around 1500 buck for my PC and it was definitely worth. I wouldnt exchange it for any console no matter how much cheaper it is
 

Cousin_IT

New member
Feb 6, 2008
1,822
0
0
buy a console = 5-10year without needing an upgrade (not including replacement for breakages)
gaming pc = bi-annual upgrades of at least one component minimum depending on how much of a nerd u are

When it comes to costs specific to gaming, console beats PC imo.
 

Kojiro ftt

New member
Apr 1, 2009
425
0
0
$500 is cheating because you still need to buy the OS, so add another $100. Unless you are assuming you pirated the OS, or uninstalled XP from another machine in order to transfer the license, rendering the original PC useless.

I've built plenty of PCs myself from "scratch" as they did here. It's easy, that's not the limiting factor. The graphics card is always the limiting factor. You can always double your RAM in a couple years when it comes down in price. But the card will be practically useless in a year or two, and that will be another $200 investment for another mediocre card, assuming the interface is even supported then. I always thought I'd upgrade my AGP card, but then they jumped to PCI-express. That's when I called it quits.
 

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
A mid-range gaming PC is more than adequate for most "normal" purposes. My components are far from high-end (they're rapidly approaching the low end, actually) but they're still quite adequate for my purposes, which obviously focus on gaming. Some people are enthusiasts (I wish I could afford to be) and some people just insist on balls-out maximum-everything settings, but if you're neither rich nor a maniac and don't have someone who falls into those categories whispering in your ear that you must have the very BEST BEST BEST or else you'll die of some horrible disease of the genitals, you can do quite well relatively cheaply, and not have to worry about regular "bi-annual" upgrades of components.
 

jebussaves88

New member
May 4, 2008
1,395
0
0
It's getting to the point where my old PC is literally going to blow up whilst chugging through HAWX or STALKER. This seems pretty good. Whats $500 in £
 

antipunt

New member
Jan 3, 2009
3,035
0
0
There are lots of little snippets being ignored.... The OS, the monitor, a stone-age hard-drive (I have little to nothing except my OS/office/a few games installed and it already takes 200 gigs), and probably weak power-supply/case as well.
 

Vonotar

New member
Feb 16, 2009
6
0
0
It depends on what you want to play really. When I look through the list of games in my Start menu though I see pure gems which just aren't available on the consoles. My PC is worth way more than $500, and every penny.
 

-Seraph-

New member
May 19, 2008
3,753
0
0
iggyus said:
Well I paid around 1500 buck for my PC and it was definitely worth. I wouldnt exchange it for any console no matter how much cheaper it is
Heh I hear you, mine came close to 2K but that was EVERYTHING excluding monitor, speakers, and KB&M. The best things come at a price, and if you want something that will last, the more expensive it may be.
 

Russ Pitts

The Boss of You
May 1, 2006
3,240
0
0
Nice. I remember when I built my "$999 Thunderbird Athlon" gaming rig using similar methodologies 10 years or so ago. You basically have to not care about bell and/or whistles and just go for raw, middle-of-the-line power. As a result, you get what you pay for, and if you're looking to get into PC gaming quickly and cheaply, it's the best way to go.

Unfortunately, as I discovered, the Achilles heel for self-built, mid-level gaming PCs is an extreme lack of future utility. All of the mid-level game rigs I built (I've built several) suffered dramatic drops in reliability and utility after only a couple of years, necessitating frequent upgrades to continue playing new-release games, which extended the cost significantly. In other words, the low cost of entry represented by self-built mid-level PCs obfuscates the true cost of PC gaming: Moore's Law.
 

triorph

New member
Aug 5, 2008
66
0
0
Consoles may be cheaper, but consider this. You will never find an original game like DotA being made for the console. (and by that, I'm referring to its lack of polish and commercialism being the prohibitive factor)
 

Disembodied_Dave

The Could-Have-Been-King
Feb 5, 2009
491
0
0
I remember hearing about this a couple of months ago. I'm actually thinking about doing it this summer.

jebussaves88 said:
It's getting to the point where my old PC is literally going to blow up whilst chugging through HAWX or STALKER. This seems pretty good. Whats $500 in £
around 250. I think. I'm pretty sure the pound is still twice as much as the dollar.
 

Doug

New member
Apr 23, 2008
5,205
0
0
thenumberthirteen said:
Still. $500 is PS3 money. Not to mention the main reason I gave up following PC gaming; after a year or so you'll have to upgrade at least 1 part of it to play the latest game.
True. But your pretty likely to need a PC anyway, if only to look at facebook and post on the Escapist ;)
 

sirdanrhodes

New member
Nov 7, 2007
3,774
0
0
Am ordering a pre-built gaming computer, £600. My current setup is laughable, *Cough* X3100 *Cough*.
 

USSR

Probably your average communist.
Oct 4, 2008
2,367
0
0
thenumberthirteen said:
Still. $500 is PS3 money. Not to mention the main reason I gave up following PC gaming; after a year or so you'll have to upgrade at least 1 part of it to play the latest game.
*gasp* One year or more?!?!

Do you not save up money?
 

Ancientgamer

New member
Jan 16, 2009
1,346
0
0
thenumberthirteen said:
Still. $500 is PS3 money. Not to mention the main reason I gave up following PC gaming; after a year or so you'll have to upgrade at least 1 part of it to play the latest game-
-on ultra high at 60 FPS I believe you ment to say. Surely you aren't implying that PC components somehow age faster than console components, especially since they're all the same damn parts.