Stolen Pixels #218: Now Hiring
Palpatine changes apprentices the way people change socks.
Read Full Article
Palpatine changes apprentices the way people change socks.
Read Full Article
EDIT: NINJA'DBob_F_It said:The "You kill it, you win it" order of things never made sense to me. You could have your one supreme guy knowing he was the better one, or you could just have two guys of similar power.
So, Order 66 made individual Jedi more powerful? Less Jedi = more Force to go around. Hmmmmm.Celtic_Kerr said:EDIT: NINJA'DBob_F_It said:The "You kill it, you win it" order of things never made sense to me. You could have your one supreme guy knowing he was the better one, or you could just have two guys of similar power.
The theory is based off of Darth Revan's (Yes, THE Darth Revan from Kotor) rule of two. There are always two sith, never more than two. One to hold the power, and one to crave it. The Jedi became so weak and let palpatine slip by unknowing he was a sith because there were so many Jedi, they diluted the force basically. Too many people trying to use the light side of it. The rule of two ensures that the two sith are as powerful as possible.
THe one who craves the power is expected to kill his master. It's almost a complement to the master in a "You trained me well, I will carry on the Sith legacy from here" kinda way. You earn what you kill
Technically it was the best thing to happen to the Jedi. It's one reason why Luke Skywalker was so power, along with Yoda. He was the only trained Jedi Knight left, he carried the brunt of the lightside like a Banhammer... And then in the books after the series he makes a very small academyben---neb said:So, Order 66 made individual Jedi more powerful? Less Jedi = more Force to go around. Hmmmmm.Celtic_Kerr said:EDIT: NINJA'DBob_F_It said:The "You kill it, you win it" order of things never made sense to me. You could have your one supreme guy knowing he was the better one, or you could just have two guys of similar power.
The theory is based off of Darth Revan's (Yes, THE Darth Revan from Kotor) rule of two. There are always two sith, never more than two. One to hold the power, and one to crave it. The Jedi became so weak and let palpatine slip by unknowing he was a sith because there were so many Jedi, they diluted the force basically. Too many people trying to use the light side of it. The rule of two ensures that the two sith are as powerful as possible.
THe one who craves the power is expected to kill his master. It's almost a complement to the master in a "You trained me well, I will carry on the Sith legacy from here" kinda way. You earn what you kill
As i understood it, it's more because the first time the Sith tried to take over (under Darth Bane, i think?) they were more numerous...buth each sith plotted to kill the others so he alone could have all the power. After the resulting massacre the jedi mopped up the remains and called it a victory.Celtic_Kerr said:EDIT: NINJA'D
The theory is based off of Darth Revan's (Yes, THE Darth Revan from Kotor) rule of two. There are always two sith, never more than two. One to hold the power, and one to crave it. The Jedi became so weak and let palpatine slip by unknowing he was a sith because there were so many Jedi, they diluted the force basically. Too many people trying to use the light side of it. The rule of two ensures that the two sith are as powerful as possible.
THe one who craves the power is expected to kill his master. It's almost a complement to the master in a "You trained me well, I will carry on the Sith legacy from here" kinda way. You earn what you kill
No, the Sith have remained united before. They thrived under the Rule of 2 with Darth RRevan, and Revan often encouraged Malik to strike him down, offering advice. But the force is an essence that flows through all living things. If more beings are trying to syphon that power, then each person gets less power to syphon.Mathak said:As i understood it, it's more because the first time the Sith tried to take over (under Darth Bane, i think?) they were more numerous...buth each sith plotted to kill the others so he alone could have all the power. After the resulting massacre the jedi mopped up the remains and called it a victory.Celtic_Kerr said:EDIT: NINJA'D
The theory is based off of Darth Revan's (Yes, THE Darth Revan from Kotor) rule of two. There are always two sith, never more than two. One to hold the power, and one to crave it. The Jedi became so weak and let palpatine slip by unknowing he was a sith because there were so many Jedi, they diluted the force basically. Too many people trying to use the light side of it. The rule of two ensures that the two sith are as powerful as possible.
THe one who craves the power is expected to kill his master. It's almost a complement to the master in a "You trained me well, I will carry on the Sith legacy from here" kinda way. You earn what you kill
Putting more than 1 sith in a room at the same time just ain't a good idea.
This right here.Mathak said:As i understood it, it's more because the first time the Sith tried to take over (under Darth Bane, i think?) they were more numerous...buth each sith plotted to kill the others so he alone could have all the power. After the resulting massacre the jedi mopped up the remains and called it a victory.Celtic_Kerr said:EDIT: NINJA'D
The theory is based off of Darth Revan's (Yes, THE Darth Revan from Kotor) rule of two. There are always two sith, never more than two. One to hold the power, and one to crave it. The Jedi became so weak and let palpatine slip by unknowing he was a sith because there were so many Jedi, they diluted the force basically. Too many people trying to use the light side of it. The rule of two ensures that the two sith are as powerful as possible.
THe one who craves the power is expected to kill his master. It's almost a complement to the master in a "You trained me well, I will carry on the Sith legacy from here" kinda way. You earn what you kill
Putting more than 1 sith in a room at the same time just ain't a good idea.
And That actually explains the problems in Shamus' comic last week. though there is still a huge difference in pushing some Droids and pulling a Star Destroyer from the upper atmosphere.Celtic_Kerr said:Technically it was the best thing to happen to the Jedi. It's one reason why Luke Skywalker was so power, along with Yoda. He was the only trained Jedi Knight left, he carried the brunt of the lightside like a Banhammer... And then in the books after the series he makes a very small academyben---neb said:So, Order 66 made individual Jedi more powerful? Less Jedi = more Force to go around. Hmmmmm.Celtic_Kerr said:EDIT: NINJA'DBob_F_It said:The "You kill it, you win it" order of things never made sense to me. You could have your one supreme guy knowing he was the better one, or you could just have two guys of similar power.
The theory is based off of Darth Revan's (Yes, THE Darth Revan from Kotor) rule of two. There are always two sith, never more than two. One to hold the power, and one to crave it. The Jedi became so weak and let palpatine slip by unknowing he was a sith because there were so many Jedi, they diluted the force basically. Too many people trying to use the light side of it. The rule of two ensures that the two sith are as powerful as possible.
THe one who craves the power is expected to kill his master. It's almost a complement to the master in a "You trained me well, I will carry on the Sith legacy from here" kinda way. You earn what you kill
Well that's the thing... THey're constantly trying to one up-themselves. I believe it was Marr_LRR that mentioned putting a fleet of Star destroyers in motion. I think I'd read tht book and they're dimply augmented the power of the drives, they didn't actually put the star destroyers into hyper drive. Atleast I think.Parshooter said:And That actually explains the problems in Shamus' comic last week. though there is still a huge difference in pushing some Droids and pulling a Star Destroyer from the upper atmosphere.Celtic_Kerr said:Technically it was the best thing to happen to the Jedi. It's one reason why Luke Skywalker was so power, along with Yoda. He was the only trained Jedi Knight left, he carried the brunt of the lightside like a Banhammer... And then in the books after the series he makes a very small academyben---neb said:So, Order 66 made individual Jedi more powerful? Less Jedi = more Force to go around. Hmmmmm.Celtic_Kerr said:EDIT: NINJA'DBob_F_It said:The "You kill it, you win it" order of things never made sense to me. You could have your one supreme guy knowing he was the better one, or you could just have two guys of similar power.
The theory is based off of Darth Revan's (Yes, THE Darth Revan from Kotor) rule of two. There are always two sith, never more than two. One to hold the power, and one to crave it. The Jedi became so weak and let palpatine slip by unknowing he was a sith because there were so many Jedi, they diluted the force basically. Too many people trying to use the light side of it. The rule of two ensures that the two sith are as powerful as possible.
THe one who craves the power is expected to kill his master. It's almost a complement to the master in a "You trained me well, I will carry on the Sith legacy from here" kinda way. You earn what you kill
That is Racist! Palpatine is Racist! I'm going to file a class action lawsuit with all of Kashyyyk on behalf of all the wookies!Non-Wookies only please.