$2.50 Reviews: Event Horizon (1997)

Marter

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 3, 2020
14,276
15
43
<color=darkred>Previous Review: <url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.391777-2-50-Reviews-The-Grudge-3-2009>The Grudge 3Next Review: <url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.391971-2-50-Reviews-Shark-Night-3D-2011>Shark Night 3D
$2.50 Reviews
Event Horizon
<img height=400 width=270>http://www.moviegoods.com/Assets/product_images/1020/207121.1020.A.jpg

According to Event Horizon, we will have colonies on the Moon by 2015. About 15 years later, we'll have started doing things on Mars as well. And by 2040, we'll have a spaceship that can create black holes with which we can teleport instantly to anywhere we want, apparently including but not limited to Hell. Aren't humans amazing? We can do so, so much if we put our minds to it. Unfortunately, based solely on this film, we can't make an involving horror movie set in space involving a killer spaceship.

[Img_Inline width="275" height="180" Caption="" align="left"]http://static.thecia.com.au/reviews/e/event-horizon-7.jpg[/Img_Inline]

The year is now 2047, precisely seven years after that black hole creating ship did that and then disappeared. For whatever reason, it has now reappeared and it's now time for a rescue crew to attempt to find the crew (assuming any members are still alive) and salvage what they can from the ship. The captain of this crew is named Miller (Laurence Fishbourne), and accompanying him is one of the designers of the once-missing spaceship, Dr. Weir (Sam Neill). There are other members as well, although they're so unmemorable and similar to one another that it's not worth mentioning them.

Before even arriving at this ship, there is a lot of turbulence. Clouds surround the Event Horizon (yes, the title of the film is the same as the ship that they're about to spend a while on), and open up within 500 meters before arrival. These clouds are never seen again, which speaks to me as lazy filmmaking, but they serve a purpose here in giving us a very nice first shot of this ship. It doesn't really matter anyway, as we're going to be spending most of the time in dark, claustrophobic interior shots. They require less special effects.

Once aboard the ship, several things begin happening, although the reason they occur isn't explained until much later on. Mostly, the various crew members begin having hallucinations -- at least, we're told they're hallucinations even after deaths begin to occur because of them. A couple of people are even set on fire (I think it was more than one, anyway), and chalking that up to "hallucination" seems silly to me. There is a naked girl whom one character thinks about, though. There definitely wasn't a naked girl on the ship.

[Img_Inline width="275" height="180" Caption="" align="right"]http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-x3cvJzO6-3Y/T6INqwjnzdI/AAAAAAAAEmo/tJ7_Zi7ufIM/s1600/blackholeehcrew.jpg[/Img_Inline]

For the most part, hallucinations are just a convenient way for the film to say "boo!" whenever it seems like the best way to make the audience jump. That's not scary, and when you lack the atmosphere and tone to make your jump scares even startle -- I suppose I should mention at this point that Event Horizon doesn't set a very good tone or atmosphere -- then your "boo!" scenes won't work at all. I can't remember a single time that made me jump or wasn't entirely predictable.

You know how I just kind of introduced something new in the middle of an idea in that last paragraph? How, while talking about jump scares I made mention about how the film doesn't have a scary enough atmosphere to make them work? You know how I could have easily gone back to an earlier paragraph and inserted it earlier to make it less jarring and seem like I'm better at this writing thing? That's like what watching Event Horizon is like. Elements are introduced out of nowhere well after they should have been. The pacing is off, and so is the supposed mystery of the ship.

See, we're made to understand, at some point, that the ship is casing the hallucinations. How does the film tell us this? By having one of the background characters come up from nowhere and telling us that, well before we should. And it's not even like it's the guy who built the ship who tells us this, but some random person who decides that the ship is working like an immune system, attempting to clean itself of the humans. Oh, but the doctor knows more than he's letting on just so he can surprise us later on -- without having any reason to.

[Img_Inline width="275" height="180" Caption="" align="left"]http://content9.flixster.com/photo/11/44/96/11449699_gal.jpg[/Img_Inline]

I wouldn't care about this if the film was scary. A horror film needs to get one thing right, and that one thing only. The rest is all bonus and extra, but if the main element -- being scary -- doesn't work, then we look to other parts to pass the time. I cared about how silly the story was, how it brought in random elements only to forget about them later on, and how the characters didn't matter or make much sense.

That final point might just be because of how underdeveloped all of the characters are. Even the two leads don't really have much of a character at all. I've read that the original cut of Event Horizon ran 130 minutes, and if most of that was character development, that earlier cut might have been better. It might have explained why some of these situations occurred, how to differentiate between these different people, and why they act the way they do. But the film still probably wouldn't have been scary, so it still would have been a failure on the whole.

Event Horizon is ultimately a boring horror flick that is neither scary, startling or interesting. There's nothing to see, nothing to take from it, and nothing that makes it worth watching. It doesn't have solid characters, a unique plot, or scares. It has jump scares, and it has a reason for those jump scares to be there, but without the audience already being on their toes, these scenes fail. This is a silly film that I can't recommend, as it's just too boring to be worth your time.

<color=D6D9DA>_________________________________________________________________________________

If you are a fan of my reviews, and want to boost my ego receive notifications when new reviews are posted, please join/visit this <url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/groups/view/2-50-Reviews>user group.
For an archive of all my previous movie reviews, please go <url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.284075-2-50-Reviews-Archive>here.
 
Mar 26, 2008
3,429
0
0
Thoroughly agreed with your review, the forgetable characters, the poorly explained psuedo-science, the cliche horror tropes (e.g. the quick cut-away and then cut back to a shambling horror over the character's shoulder) make it a really disposable movie. Sam Neill also seems badly mis-cast, which doesn't help.

I'm surprised you didn't mention the scene where they unscramble the video log. I must admit that was the one thing that got me to sit up and take notice when I first saw it. Now, not so much.

You probably shouldn't have dropped the "H" word though because that's a semi-spoiler if you hadn't have already seen it coming.

Anyway, that was a good read.
 

G32420NL

New member
Jul 3, 2012
97
0
0
This is one of those films that i really love that others seem to find many flaws in :(
But you gave good arguments and although i do not agree on the boring part i still find it to be a proper review.

What did you think of "sunshine" if you watched it? (kind of the same buildup, moviestyle)
 

boyvirgo666

New member
May 12, 2009
371
0
0
I actually liked that movie when i saw it. havent watched it in years so my opinion may have changed
 

Marter

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 3, 2020
14,276
15
43
G32420NL said:
What did you think of "sunshine" if you watched it? (kind of the same buildup, moviestyle)
Much, much better. Mostly because it actually had something on its mind.

That review will be coming next month sometime, so stay tuned!
 
Mar 26, 2008
3,429
0
0
Have you seen "In the Mouth of Madness"? It's another horror movie with Sam Neill in it, however it's directed by John Carpenter and draws on some of H.P Lovecraft's themes. I used to love it as a teen, but haven't watched it in ages.
 

Marter

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 3, 2020
14,276
15
43
Programmed_For_Damage said:
Have you seen "In the Mouth of Madness"? It's another horror movie with Sam Neill in it, however it's directed by John Carpenter and draws on some of H.P Lovecraft's themes. I used to love it as a teen, but haven't watched it in ages.
No, I haven't.

Heard of it, but never seen it. Looks interesting, though, so I'll have to check it out someday.
 

cojo965

New member
Jul 28, 2012
1,650
0
0
Programmed_For_Damage said:
Thoroughly agreed with your review, the forgetable characters, the poorly explained psuedo-science, the cliche horror tropes (e.g. the quick cut-away and then cut back to a shambling horror over the character's shoulder) make it a really disposable movie. Sam Neill also seems badly mis-cast, which doesn't help.

I'm surprised you didn't mention the scene where they unscramble the video log. I must admit that was the one thing that got me to sit up and take notice when I first saw it. Now, not so much.

You probably shouldn't have dropped the "H" word though because that's a semi-spoiler if you hadn't have already seen it coming.

Anyway, that was a good read.
No shit have you heard his scream of terror? That was very hard to take seriously. There is a quick bit of nudity in the clip I'm about to show, just a heads up.

 

Zen Bard

Eats, Shoots and Leaves
Sep 16, 2012
704
0
0
I remember seeing this film in the theaters and initially being somewhat creeped out by it.

That atmosphere, I felt, was fairly effective. It was only as the movie continued that I found myself less and less impressed by it.

Two things bothered me:

1) It had a good set up that resolved with a poorly executed payoff.

and

2) It's essentially the same plot of the classic videogame "Doom" (but not nearly as clever, creative or imaginative).
 

Aaron Foltz

New member
Aug 6, 2012
69
0
0
DO YOU SEE??!!!!

Lots of people may dislike this flick but it has a charm to it I think only a select few can enjoy (no matter how you classify those select few).
 

Terrible Opinions

New member
Sep 11, 2011
498
0
0
No but seriously, who builds a ship interior that spiky?

That's just asking for Bad Things.
Programmed_For_Damage said:
Have you seen "In the Mouth of Madness"? It's another horror movie with Sam Neill in it, however it's directed by John Carpenter and draws on some of H.P Lovecraft's themes. I used to love it as a teen, but haven't watched it in ages.
Man, I loved the shit out of In the Mouth of Madness. Even more than its older brothers Prince of Darkness and The Thing. Though the final dream bit from Prince of Darkness was pretty glorious...