Silva said:
Games are NOT older than novels. They are older than film in the non-computer sense. If you allow a regression from your subject of computer gaming to just gaming, then you have to regress on film and novels too. In that case, novels are the oldest, because their ancient form, the verbal saga, is far older. I'm talking thousands of years older, here.
I think that's a remnant from a larger point (but kind of irrelevant to this article) that I wanted to make which is core to my personal game development philosophy - how people always shoehorn video games into some progression of narrative / depiction of reality (e.g. epic verse > novel > film > video games!) but really games are on a separate track, in my mind, a progression of abstraction (e.g. hunting and gathering > Tag > Basketball > Monopoly > video games!)
From my own limited knowledge about the history of narrative, I'd argue the verbal saga was almost more of a performance (with the bard improvising, changing stuff around for the audience) than a written text. I'm kind of taking a page from Johan Huizinga's "Homo Ludens" with my perspective - though I think he goes a little far in saying it's older than culture, and I'd rather make a distinction between simply "play" and a "game," and now I feel I'm rambling so I'll stop now.