After Seven Years, Mercury Finally Has Our Message

Scott Bullock

New member
Nov 11, 2010
1,063
0
0
After Seven Years, Mercury Finally Has Our Message

An event seven years in the making, the Messenger satellite has finally achieved orbit around Mercury, becoming the first man-made object to orbit the planet closest to the sun.

After the Japanese attempt to put a satellite around Venus earlier this year failed miserably, tensions were high as the Messenger Satellite approached Mercury. As the satellite began a thruster burn to slow down enough to be grabbed by Mercury's gravity, everyone knew that there was a chance that 15 years of planning and seven years of space travel could go down the drain. But the worries were for naught as the Messenger was caught in orbit around Mercury.

Messenger, an acronym for MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry and Ranging was quite the busy satellite on its 4.9 billion mile journey to Mercury. In order to slow itself to the appropriate speed and approach Mercury at the correct angle, the satellite had to fly by Earth once, Venus twice, and Mercury three times, and had to orbit the sun 15 times. Through it all, Messenger took pictures of the inner planets, including one of Earth and the Moon from 114 million miles away, seen above.

Messenger is now in a 12-hour orbit around Mercury, running diagnostic tests to ensure everything is working properly. To protect itself against the harsh heat of the sun, which is 11 times brighter on Mercury than on Earth, the whole satellite has a ceramic shield, to protect those delicate science-y bits. The goals of the satellite are varied, and include mapping the surface of the planet, analyzing it's composition, and measuring the strength of its magnetic field. The experiments should begin April 4.

Source: Kotaku [http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2011-03/after-messenger-spacecrafts-successful-orbital-burn-mercury-has-its-first-ever-satellite]

Permalink
 

silver wolf009

[[NULL]]
Jan 23, 2010
3,432
0
0
Great! Another milestone in our expansion. Lets roll up our sleaves and see what there is to see then, shall we?
 

Tartarga

New member
Jun 4, 2008
3,649
0
0
Inb4 the sun destroys it somehow. I can almost picture NASA going FFFFUUUUU! Still, yet another impressive achievement for the human race. I can't wait to see what we come up with next, here's hoping for giant robots.
 

viranimus

Thread killer
Nov 20, 2009
4,952
0
0
Sweet.. Next step, we scan the thing for any available resources and launch probes to extract them. Hrm.. why do I get the sudden urge to replay Mass effect 2?
 

fix-the-spade

New member
Feb 25, 2008
8,639
0
0
Naawww, I was hoping for something related to Queen.
Don't crash me noooowwww! I'm having such a good time, I'm circling a baallll....


Anyway, let's see what they find out about Mercury from this. Hopefully it'll be a bit more enlightening that 'it's definately round,'
 

luckycharms8282

New member
Mar 28, 2009
540
0
0
Sounds like a waste of taxpayer money. The US needs to cut its funding of expensive science projects like this one. Why not put that new money towars getting our country out of the deficit or feeding some people?

Focus on solving our problems here on Earth before we go looking for more, shall we?
 

Scott Bullock

New member
Nov 11, 2010
1,063
0
0
luckycharms8282 said:
Sounds like a waste of taxpayer money. The US needs to cut its funding of expensive science projects like this one. Why not put that new money towars getting our country out of the deficit or feeding some people?

Focus on solving our problems here on Earth before we go looking for more, shall we?
You may have missed the part where it was launched about 7 years ago in 2004. We were doing pretty okay in 2004, from what I remember, and could afford "science projects."
 

Owlslayer

New member
Nov 26, 2009
1,954
0
0
Yay. Go, humanity!
Another science-y thing done, a million to do. I hope something at least semi-interesting for the public will be found or discovered.
 

McMullen

New member
Mar 9, 2010
1,334
0
0
luckycharms8282 said:
Sounds like a waste of taxpayer money. The US needs to cut its funding of expensive science projects like this one. Why not put that new money towars getting our country out of the deficit or feeding some people?

Focus on solving our problems here on Earth before we go looking for more, shall we?
Why is it that so many people react to news of a scientific discovery or breakthrough by assuming out of hand that it's not going to do anyone any good? And using electricity, computers, and the internet too. All those things were similarly scoffed at by people like you as things that would only amount to diversions for the idle.

Granted, anyone posting here is certainly idle, perhaps even when they should not be, but those technologies are now pillars of our civilization.

Suppose Mercury has things we might want to mine someday? Would be nice to know about that now instead of having to wait another 7 years to find out, wouldn't it? Besides, as someone above mentioned, things were different when that probe was launched.

Scientific research, in any field, has a way of discovering things that we didn't know we didn't know, which a few years later become things that we are extremely grateful to know. Those discoveries make their way into the economy in the form of technology and marketable ideas or skills. Those create jobs, and lots of them. Those jobs help fuel the portions of the economies of developed nations that are not finance or service-based, the ones that endure economic hardships, in other words the kind of jobs you want in a healthy, stable, and durable economy.

Science is never a waste of taxpayer dollars, because it is what allows a nation to stay both relevant and competitive. Do you think America's post-WWII prosperity (let alone the fact that it was on the winning side of that war) had nothing to do with the fact that it was the scientific powerhouse of the world at the time? Do you think it is coincidence that the Middle East was once a medieval economic and intellectual superpower, and spiraled into a decay it never recovered from almost as soon as they decided that their research was an affront to Allah?

Besides, don't you realize that your viewpoint shares a lot of its philosophy with that of the Moral Guardians who just don't know how to calm down about violent video games, or whatever newfangled thing is corrupting the children these days? Relax. New things, and new ideas, are not guaranteed to be harmful, or a waste of time or money. There is always the potential for worthwhile things to come from them, and the vast majority of those are things we never would have expected in the beginning. Just look at what people are doing with the Kinect. Not so great as a gaming device so far, but we are still being amazed by how much potential it really has in the hands of creative people.
 

Kuala BangoDango

New member
Mar 19, 2009
191
0
0
luckycharms8282 said:
Sounds like a waste of taxpayer money. The US needs to cut its funding of expensive science projects like this one. Why not put that new money towars getting our country out of the deficit or feeding some people?

Focus on solving our problems here on Earth before we go looking for more, shall we?
Actually, it's science projects like this that help inspire kids (and adults too) to do better in school, pursue higher education, and get into those "sciency" fields that will invent the technology needed to feed the world and get our countries out of debt.

Or are you suggesting that our world would be a better place if only today's youth had more inspiring examples to drive our country forward like American Idol, Survivor, Twilight, Lindsey Lohan, The Apprentice, and our CEO heroes in the financial world purposely ruining their own companies to make themselves rich?

Also, the funding that goes to NASA is a drop in the bucket compared to what we spend on our country's "defense" budget which, surprisingly, is only ever used for offense.
 

The Rogue Wolf

Stealthy Carnivore
Legacy
Nov 25, 2007
16,904
9,594
118
Stalking the Digital Tundra
Gender
✅
This proves two things:

1. Science can do amazing things (when they don't forget to translate from metric to Imperial measurments)

2. Some people will just absolutely go to any lengths for an acronym.

luckycharms8282 said:
Focus on solving our problems here on Earth before we go
looking for more, shall we?
One of the problems here on Earth is that there's too many of us on it. Either we put some serious effort into learning how to move beyond this little blue-and-green marble (or at the very least, find resources from beyond it) or we're going to have to start depopulating. And if it comes to that, I say the "science is too expensive!" crowd gets to go first.

[small]Besides, how are we supposed to have sex with hot blue alien chicks otherwise No, no, I will not resort to that.[/small]
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
This just in: A message has been found on the surface; "Hello, Sweetie."

Scientists are baffled as to the meaning.
 

RA92

New member
Jan 1, 2011
3,079
0
0
Messenger, an acronym for MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry and Ranging...

Hmmm, NASA has its way with acronyms, don't they? :)
luckycharms8282 said:
Sounds like a waste of taxpayer money. The US needs to cut its funding of expensive science projects like this one. Why not put that new money towars getting our country out of the deficit or feeding some people?

Focus on solving our problems here on Earth before we go looking for more, shall we?
Wanna cut on spendings? Tell your military to cut down on the F-35. $323 billion spent so far (and still counting) on a project to procure an aircraft that no one needs.
 

garjian

New member
Mar 25, 2009
1,013
0
0
what does it matter?

...its not exactly like we can go all "Launching Probe..." and get some Element Zero, that we'll use to invent the next period of advnacement in our super-important-everything.
 

fix-the-spade

New member
Feb 25, 2008
8,639
0
0
The Rogue Wolf said:
(or at the very least, find resources from beyond it)
This may be overly negative of me, but mining other planets or celestial bodies has always struck me as a spectacularly bad idea.

Every so often the odea of mining the moon springs up. Which begs the question, has anyone considered the possible effect of altering the moon's mass? Obviously initially the effect would be negligible, but given our species' habit of strip mining everything it would be worth considering the eventual consequences of reducing the mass of out nearest large rock whilst increasing the mass of our own.

What affect would it have on weather patterns, tides, would it alter it's orbit, would it even decay it's orbit? If we're going to try it it's worth thinking about very hard.
 

008Zulu_v1legacy

New member
Sep 6, 2009
6,019
0
0
fix-the-spade said:
Every so often the odea of mining the moon springs up. Which begs the question, has anyone considered the possible effect of altering the moon's mass?
If the moon suddenly disappeared very little would be different. The tides would barely be affected. Scientists have already solved that thought.

I bet we find that Mercury is home of the Necrons.
 

Jamous

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,941
0
0
Very exciting! :D I wonder what we'll find out.
008Zulu said:
fix-the-spade said:
Every so often the odea of mining the moon springs up. Which begs the question, has anyone considered the possible effect of altering the moon's mass?
If the moon suddenly disappeared very little would be different. The tides would barely be affected. Scientists have already solved that thought.

I bet we find that Mercury is home of the Necrons.
OH GOD PLEASE NO. D: DO NOT WANT C'TAN. D: