Anonymous "Spokesman" Quits, Forms Splinter Group

Greg Tito

PR for Dungeons & Dragons
Sep 29, 2005
12,070
0
0
Anonymous "Spokesman" Quits, Forms Splinter Group


A prominent member of the Anonymous community has quit the collective and taken at least 2 dozen hackers with him.

Last week we reported that a rogue Anonymous member - known as "Ryan" - had taken control of some of the hacker collective's servers that host the IRC channels [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/109920-Disgruntled-Anonymous-Faction-Maliciously-Attacks-Anonymous], which make up the bulk of the group's communications. Last we heard, the core group of hackers - which is as close to a "leadership" that Anonymous has - was attempting to regain control of the IRC channels and a 800k PC strong botnet used to make DDoS attacks. There is no word on how successful they have been, but we're starting to see some fallout from the infighting. Barrett Brown, sometimes called a "spokesman" for Anonymous, publicly stated that he is no longer a part of the group and that he is forming a splinter group to continue work on exposing "criminality and corruption" within U.S. government and institutions. The feud between "Ryan" and the rest of Anonymous was a big reason for Brown's departure.

"I'm tired of the drama," Brown said. "You've got kids fighting for control of an IRC channel. I'm a researcher. I'm into revolutionary stuff. But there are other people for whom its about exerting power."

Barrett Brown began his work with Anonymous as a journalist, reporting on the group's activities in a positive light for the Huffington Post [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/barrett-brown/the-aims-of-anonymous_b_794182.html]. He went on to give interviews about Anonymous and write press releases for its various activities. Brown was then called by some to be a spokesman for the group, which he denied stating that there was no official leadership.

Now, it appears that Brown has grown tired of his association with Anonymous and will now focus on his group Project PM whose stated goals are to "improve the distribution of accurate and informative news, couple journalists with scientists in order to make useful information more readily available to the masses, and to help develop undeveloped regions of Africa with as much efficiency as attainable."

Perhaps Brown wanted Anonymous to be a more important force than it actually was. The group's shutting down Gene Simmons [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/105954-Anonymous-Declares-Infowar-on-Wikileaks-Opponents] as it is about enforcing political freedoms.

The events of the last month or so leaves me wondering where will Anonymous go now. The attacks on Sony, even though his lawsuit defense [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/109808-Anonymous-Denies-New-Sony-Allegations-of-PSN-Involvement].

Was the theft of personal information and the PSN outage [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/tag/psn+down] the work of a similar splinter group of Anonymous, who wants to remain even more anonymous?

Source: Threat Post [http://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/barrett-brown-public-face-anonymous-leaves-group-051611]

Permalink
 

Macgyvercas

Spice & Wolf Restored!
Feb 19, 2009
6,103
0
0
From the looks of things, Anonymous is starting to collapse in on itself.

Hey! Maybe it'll form a black hole or something awesome like that!
 

matrix3509

New member
Sep 24, 2008
1,372
0
0
Hipster: I was into Anon before it became mainstream.

Thats all I really hear coming out of this guy's mouth.

EDIT: This whole deal with Anon sounds like one massive slashfic on the level of "My Immortal."
 

Veloxe

New member
Oct 5, 2010
491
0
0
I'm actually surprised they managed to stay "together" as long as they have without a massive implosion like this.
 

Armored Prayer

New member
Mar 10, 2009
5,319
0
0
Seems like the man is abandoning ship before it horribly crashes.

I really don't care about this whole issue, but I support his continuing exposure of corruption in the governments and institutions.
 

RA92

New member
Jan 1, 2011
3,079
0
0
I'm telling you, this would make an awesome theatrical drama. Whether it's tragedy or comedy should be reserved to the audience, though.
 

Kopikatsu

New member
May 27, 2010
4,924
0
0
So begins the Great Internet Schism.

So...now we wait for the Internet Crusades?

Can I be the Internet Pope? I wanna be the Pope. Pope Skinny the XXXVIth. That's me!
 

Xenotechie

New member
Sep 30, 2010
14
0
0
Whoever loses,we win.Well,I think this will become war-ish.
Seriously, I am surprised this didn't happen before.
 

Vanbael

Arctic fox and BACON lover
Jun 13, 2009
626
0
0
The drama here is warranting more POPCORN!
*om nom nom nom nom nom nom nom nom noms more popcorn with the drama*

But what intrigues me is this:
Greg Tito said:
"I'm tired of the drama," Brown said. "You've got kids fighting for control of an IRC channel. I'm a researcher. I'm into revolutionary stuff. But there are other people for whom its about exerting power."

[cut out a paragraph here]

Now, it appears that Brown has grown tired of his association with Anonymous and will now focus on his group Project PM whose stated goals are to "improve the distribution of accurate and informative news, couple journalists with scientists in order to make useful information more readily available to the masses, and to help develop undeveloped regions of Africa with as much efficiency as attainable."
He sets himself apart here, and I like what he is aspiring to. He made a good move to jump ship. I see him more grown up than Anonymous as a whole.
 

Awexsome

Were it so easy
Mar 25, 2009
1,549
0
0
I think this guy is doing the right thing. I can understand his desire behind his free-information group and just attaching that image to these cyber-terrorists was hurting his goals.
 

Eiv

New member
Oct 17, 2008
376
0
0
Donnyp said:
So let me get this straight. A group with no actual form or definite organization is falling apart? Sounds to me like some of them just realized that they don't want to be a part of a group of assholes and pedophiles.
think your confusing Anon with 4chan.
 

Micah Weil

New member
Mar 16, 2009
499
0
0
matrix3509 said:
This whole deal with Anon sounds like one massive slashfic on the level of "My Immortal."
Shame on you. You KNOW there is nothing as bad as My Immortal!

Eh, this is no surprise. To be expected, really. Just expected to see Anon go...well...more kaboomy than usual.
 

Versuvius

New member
Apr 30, 2008
803
0
0
Anon has no structure, no heirarchy and no defined criteria for being a member. It has no spokespersons, only people who claim to be. Also said 'Ryan' is a namefag and thus is not true Anon. How does a collection of people who visit /b/ collapse in on itself? Anon members infight all the time. Its just recently become interesting to the media. If you think Anon is anything but what its always been you obviously dont understand the internet. Rock on freaky /b/rothas.
 

luvd1

New member
Jan 25, 2010
736
0
0
Well if your going to go against 200,000 years of human nature these things happen. Humans can't socialise without making some kind of hierarchy. Someone is always going to appoint themselves king.
 

CM156_v1legacy

Revelation 9:6
Mar 23, 2011
3,997
0
0
As I stated before, this reminds me of the Blood War: Petty and without point. Besides, the biggest players on both sides don't seem to be involved. Still, at least they are giving focus to themselves, rather than us, so I don't have a problem with this.

That being said, as I have stated before, I am no fan of anon. This cult of amoral hacktavists can go away for all I care.
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
18,680
3,591
118
Donnyp said:
So let me get this straight. A group with no actual form or definite organization is falling apart?
And every step of the way is newsworthy.