We figured this one was under the radar enough that no one would mind if it was a little late. But then you came along. *shakes fist*WhiteTigerShiro said:Reviews queue getting a little backlogged? I got this one on Steam ages ago. Still, a really good game, and I agree about Time Challenge. There's one in particular that no matter how quickly or perfectly I get through it, I'm always just one second off from being able to make those last couple clicks to finish it out. Time Challenge is basically for OCD freaks like me who feel the need to complete a game 100%.
Also, some of the puzzles are just plain evil. There's literally no other way to describe them.
My iPhone didn't cost me more than a PS3, in fact, I could have gotten it for free if I'd wanted.nevernow said:Are you implying that a device that costs more than a PS3 and is basically a phone is the best place for small, cheap bite-size-gameplay games? I think the PC is one of their natural homes, and the DS would be the other one.
Somebody's gotta keep you guys on your toes. ;DJordan Deam said:We figured this one was under the radar enough that no one would mind if it was a little late. But then you came along. *shakes fist*WhiteTigerShiro said:Reviews queue getting a little backlogged? I got this one on Steam ages ago. Still, a really good game, and I agree about Time Challenge. There's one in particular that no matter how quickly or perfectly I get through it, I'm always just one second off from being able to make those last couple clicks to finish it out. Time Challenge is basically for OCD freaks like me who feel the need to complete a game 100%.
Also, some of the puzzles are just plain evil. There's literally no other way to describe them.
Likewise. I enjoy both Pipe Dream-esque games and Incredible Machine-like games, but hate slide puzzles with a firey passion.Eric the Orange said:I really like puzzle games but i've never been very good at the pannel sliding varaiaty.
In my country, the cheapest iPhone on the Apple store (no subscriptions attached, you simply buy the device like you would buy a TV, this is the most common mobile business model here) costs 499?, or 703$. A PS3 usually costs 369?, or 520$. And having to pay an expensive subscription (like 50/60 ?/$) to get an iPhone for free or for a cheap price doesn't sound like an optimal solution to me.nilcypher said:My iPhone didn't cost me more than a PS3, in fact, I could have gotten it for free if I'd wanted.nevernow said:Are you implying that a device that costs more than a PS3 and is basically a phone is the best place for small, cheap bite-size-gameplay games? I think the PC is one of their natural homes, and the DS would be the other one.
Buying an iPhone solely for gaming isn't going to be a great purchase, but the point that Jordan was making is that the game feels like something designed to be played on the move still stands. An iPhone is one place it would fit, and by the look of it, you're right about the DS as well.nevernow said:In my country, the cheapest iPhone on the Apple store (no subscriptions attached, you simply buy the device like you would buy a TV, this is the most common mobile business model here) costs 499?, or 703$. A PS3 usually costs 369?, or 520$. And having to pay an expensive subscription (like 50/60 ?/$) to get an iPhone for free or for a cheap price doesn't sound like an optimal solution to me.nilcypher said:My iPhone didn't cost me more than a PS3, in fact, I could have gotten it for free if I'd wanted.nevernow said:Are you implying that a device that costs more than a PS3 and is basically a phone is the best place for small, cheap bite-size-gameplay games? I think the PC is one of their natural homes, and the DS would be the other one.