The Darkness II's FOV Issue Getting Patched

The Wooster

King Snap
Jul 15, 2008
15,305
0
0
The Darkness II's FOV Issue Getting Patched

Digital Extremes is working on a patch for The Darkness II's nauseating field of view setting.

One of the marks of a sloppy console port is a narrow, unchangeable FOV. The term, for those of you who don't spend their time on deliciously frothy PC gaming forums, essentially refers to how much of the game world you can see at once. The human eye doesn't just see what's directly in front of it, including peripheral vision, the visual field of the average non-pirate is approximately 120 degrees.

Most good first person shooters offer a field of view of between 90-100 degrees - and including an option to change that is a sign of conscientious game development. Digital Extremes' The Darkness II [http://www.amazon.com/Darkness-II-Xbox-360/dp/B004ML7WOK] offers around 60 degrees, perhaps less, which kind of gives the impression that protagonist, Jackie Estacado, spends the entire game with a set of binoculars glued to his face.

While console players using televisions generally won't notice the issue, low FOVs become increasingly nauseating (to some) the closer you are to the screen. For PC gamers who generally use monitors, low FOVs can make games physically uncomfortable to play.

The Darkness II's low FOV was noticed by Steam Forum users - who reacted to it the same way they react to everything else, by screaming about it in broken English - but it wasn't until prominent critic, Total Biscuit, created the above video that the developers sat up and took notice. Following Biscuit's simple breakdown of the issue, and his erudite arguments against developers who don't include FOV options, developer Sheldon Carter tweeted that Digital Extremes is working on a fix. [https://twitter.com/#!/sheldoncarter/status/167409595625639937]

Progress!

Now if only they would patch that awful cliffhanger ending. [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/editorials/reviews/9402-The-Darkness-II-Review]

Permalink
 

hazabaza1

Want Skyrim. Want. Do want.
Nov 26, 2008
9,612
0
0
See, I never got too bothered by FOV, and pretty much anything in first person I play on PC. I mean, sure it's convenient, but is it really such a bother?
And oh, TotalBiscuit, just couldn't go a single video without bashing consoles, could you?
 

Raineheart

New member
Mar 23, 2009
152
0
0
hazabaza1 said:
See, I never got too bothered by FOV, and pretty much anything in first person I play on PC. I mean, sure it's convenient, but is it really such a bother?
And oh, TotalBiscuit, just couldn't go a single video without bashing consoles, could you?
It becomes a bother when you have physical side effects of a narrow FOV - headaches, fatigue, nausea and such; this isn't something that affects a tiny majority, it has an impact on more gamers than people would usually think.


Oh, and he isn't bashing consoles, he's bashing sloppy developers. Miiiiight want to watch the video first.
 

Subatomic

New member
Sep 1, 2011
72
0
0
hazabaza1 said:
See, I never got too bothered by FOV, and pretty much anything in first person I play on PC. I mean, sure it's convenient, but is it really such a bother?
It is an issue for those affected by it, yes. Just watching the entire video in fullscreen mode made me nauseous, and that's not because of the violence. Not everyone is affected by it to the same degree, but the number of people having problems like nausea, headaches etc because of an unneccessary low FOV on PC is significant.
 

hazabaza1

Want Skyrim. Want. Do want.
Nov 26, 2008
9,612
0
0
Raineheart said:
hazabaza1 said:
See, I never got too bothered by FOV, and pretty much anything in first person I play on PC. I mean, sure it's convenient, but is it really such a bother?
And oh, TotalBiscuit, just couldn't go a single video without bashing consoles, could you?
It becomes a bother when you have physical side effects of a narrow FOV - headaches, fatigue, nausea and such; this isn't something that affects a tiny majority, it has an impact on more gamers than people would usually think.


Oh, and he isn't bashing consoles, he's bashing sloppy developers. Miiiiight want to watch the video first.
TheKasp said:
As long as this issue is not patched I won't buy The Darnkess 2. I get sick from narrow FOV, I don't like beeing sick.

hazabaza1 said:
He bashed consoles? Where?
I don't know the exact quote, can't be bothered to rewatch the video because I already did last night, but I believe it's around 11 minutes when he starts to go off on a tangent about how 'console controllers are inadequate for this kind of game.'
His opinion is fine, but whenever the topic comes up it seems like he just feels the need to pipe up about it.
 

Subatomic

New member
Sep 1, 2011
72
0
0
hazabaza1 said:
I don't know the exact quote, can't be bothered to rewatch the video because I already did last night, but I believe it's around 11 minutes when he starts to go off on a tangent about how 'console controllers are inadequate for this kind of game.'
His opinion is fine, but whenever the topic comes up it seems like he just feels the need to pipe up about it.
That's at the very end of the video, and it's about 20 seconds long... I wouldn't call that 'going of on a tangent' in a 16 minute video. By the way, he only said that in relation to The Darkness 1 which he played on the XBox360 and was surprised how well the controls worked for him (emphasis mine).
 

mariofan1000

New member
Sep 25, 2009
242
0
0
hazabaza1 said:
See, I never got too bothered by FOV, and pretty much anything in first person I play on PC. I mean, sure it's convenient, but is it really such a bother?
And oh, TotalBiscuit, just couldn't go a single video without bashing consoles, could you?
He was only talking about how he personally can't play FPS games with a controller.
 
Jun 7, 2010
1,257
0
0
While the game should have those options included, i think he's overreacting when he goes on about "blatant disrespect" for the PC community. You can see from the community person's response that they genuinely thought that they were doing what was right for the game. It seems to me that TotalBiscuit thinks he's PC community Batman. Which he would be if Batman made a living from bitching and moaning about the injustice PC gamers face from developers who are obviously out to get them.
 

Subatomic

New member
Sep 1, 2011
72
0
0
Secret world leader (shhh) said:
You can see from the community person's response that they genuinely thought that they were doing what was right for the game.
That statement proves his whole point though. If they thought such a narrow, not adjustable FOV was right for the game, they either a) had no idea of the effects on PC or b) they knew, but didn't care enough to include a FOV-option for the PC. Either one is not really acceptable for such a big budget game.
 

The Wooster

King Snap
Jul 15, 2008
15,305
0
0
Secret world leader (shhh) said:
While the game should have those options included, i think he's overreacting when he goes on about "blatant disrespect" for the PC community.
It's disrespectful because the effort it takes to implement features like FOV-tweaking, key rebinding etc is really marginal, yet many products ship without them. Developers aren't even taking the most fundamental steps to adapt a game to the PC platform, then they complain when the games don't sell.
 

Scrustle

New member
Apr 30, 2011
2,031
0
0
And that is why TotalBiscuit is awesome, boys and girls. But I have to add this problem isn't just with PC games. It's a problem with console games too, although admittedly to a lower degree. As a primarily console player I do sometimes feel frustrated with the lack of peripheral vision in many first person games. I think people should recognise that.
 

88chaz88

New member
Jul 23, 2010
236
0
0
hazabaza1 said:
See, I never got too bothered by FOV, and pretty much anything in first person I play on PC. I mean, sure it's convenient, but is it really such a bother?
Yes.

It clearly doesn't bother you, and it doesn't bother me (though I like to set my FOV wide for other reasons). However I know a lot of PC gamers who get physically ill when locked in a narrow FOV. Valve are notorious for making people hurl, my friend had to play Portal with going to the bathroom every five minutes.

So yes, it is an issue. I wouldn't go as far as to say a game without FOV options isn't fit for purpose but it's certainly a sign of disrespect on the part of the developer.

Also TB didn't "bash" consoles. He simply said it wasn't an issue as they sit further away.
 

Jazoni89

New member
Dec 24, 2008
3,059
0
0
hazabaza1 said:
See, I never got too bothered by FOV, and pretty much anything in first person I play on PC. I mean, sure it's convenient, but is it really such a bother?
And oh, TotalBiscuit, just couldn't go a single video without bashing consoles, could you?
Giving out facts, and bashing is two totally different things.

He has said this too many times, that he is a PC and console gamer (like me also), and he owns all of the consoles.

It's no secret that a mouse offers better precision than a console controller when it comes to gaming genres such as FPS and strategy.

While consoles have much superior controls in other genres over PC, Fighting games and Racing games spring to mind. Total Biscuit has also touched up on console strengths as well, and the superior control it has over PC in some gaming genres.

So please get your facts straight next time.
 

blackknight467

New member
May 21, 2009
15
0
0
Secret world leader (shhh) said:
While the game should have those options included, i think he's overreacting when he goes on about "blatant disrespect" for the PC community. You can see from the community person's response that they genuinely thought that they were doing what was right for the game. It seems to me that TotalBiscuit thinks he's PC community Batman. Which he would be if Batman made a living from bitching and moaning about the injustice PC gamers face from developers who are obviously out to get them.
As someone who's actually made and used graphics engines before, It is really easy to include a field of view option as it literally is just allowing a single variable to be changed. This is a standard feature in most graphics engines and literally requires next to no work.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
hazabaza1 said:
See, I never got too bothered by FOV, and pretty much anything in first person I play on PC. I mean, sure it's convenient, but is it really such a bother?
Is it an issue when people are effectively given motion sickness from playing a game they've dropped £30 on? I'm going to go for a wild guess here and say, "of course it bloody is! Duh!".

Still, I have to give credit to the people who insist its not that much of a problem when there's forum threads and comments all over the shop about it. As is said in the video, human FOV is a lot wider in real life, so it affects a large amount of people when its unnaturally constrained.

Valve's games make me feel absolutely awful on the default FOV, but they have always let us change it.

88chaz88 said:
Valve are notorious for making people hurl, my friend had to play Portal with going to the bathroom every five minutes.
Your friend does know it can be changed, doesn't he? I think they go up to about 110 degrees (at least 100).

Scrustle said:
And that is why TotalBiscuit is awesome, boys and girls. But I have to add this problem isn't just with PC games. It's a problem with console games too, although admittedly to a lower degree. As a primarily console player I do sometimes feel frustrated with the lack of peripheral vision in many first person games. I think people should recognise that.
Unfortunately, that's an inherent problem with the consoles.

OT: Good, should have been in the game in the first place.

It is irrelevant if the PC is in third place in terms of sales; if you are going to release it on the platform, you treat all of your customers and platforms to the same standard. On the PC, that means you give them configurable options that are necessary for them to be comfortable.
 

Baresark

New member
Dec 19, 2010
3,908
0
0
Grey Carter said:
Secret world leader (shhh) said:
While the game should have those options included, i think he's overreacting when he goes on about "blatant disrespect" for the PC community.
It's disrespectful because the effort it takes to implement features like FOV-tweaking, key rebinding etc is really marginal, yet many products ship without them. Developers aren't even taking the most fundamental steps to adapt a game to the PC platform, then they complain when the games don't sell.
That is a great truth you speak Grey. To add to that, it also feels like they are releasing a PC version just as a quick money grab and that PC gamers are not actually important. That would be fine, just don't release a product to us if that is the case. I have to say though, the fact they released a demo was amazing. The subject of FOV was brought up right after the demo release on the 2K forums (the only forum at the time), originally.

OT: I pretty much jumped with joy when I saw that TotalBiscuit episode. It's a great game that is otherwise marred with this issue. I had taken to playing it in a window to fix the FOV, which is a very unpopular means of correcting the problem.
 

ASnogarD

New member
Jul 2, 2009
525
0
0
2K, via Elizibeth ( not her fault, she is just the messenger ) have dissmissed PC issues before and had to backtrack, specifically noting the fracus caused when 2K decided not to publish certain Bioshock 2 DLC to the PC initially.
They gave out a long load of BS to try smooth it up but didnt work and they said they were going to make the DLC available for the PC ( wouldnt know if it did, I dont buy DLC on principle ).

It is disrespectfull of the PC market in that the developer / publisher doesnt consider the market specifics, its basically just doing enough to make the 360 version work on the PC... oh and enabling the use of a mouse and keyboard.
I can understand they feel the PC is a lesser market , fine but if you cant be bothered to put up a piece of software for the platform properly then in my opinion dont bother at all.
It is very frustrating knowing that if a little more effort was expended that title would of been considerably more enjoyable.

It is more frustrating knowing that Digital Illusions have worked on high end PC titles before, as TB pointed out the Unreal Tournament ( and original Unreal ) game and that engine had a metric tonne of options you could fiddle with... its not like they dont know or are not familiar with the PC market.
 

bobmus

Full Frontal Nerdity
May 25, 2010
2,285
0
41
One of the tags here is barfing? You stay classy Escapist!

OT: I only discovered the usefulness of FOV when playing TF2, but now my eyes are opened wide!
 

everythingbeeps

New member
Sep 30, 2011
946
0
0
THANK YOU FOR THIS ARTICLE.

I was never really able to figure out why games like Darkness and Prey made me phyisically ill. All I could really figure out was that it had something to do with what happened to objects at the side when they got closer, and what happened to walls when I turned around in a room. ("Things directly in front of me would seem to swing closer when I turned away from them.")

Watching the above video, FOV is exactly what the problem is. Hell, even now I feel a little queasy from it.

Oh, and thanks for saving me a sick evening playing the Darkness 2 demo. Whew.