Pirate Bay Crackdown Drives Virtual Private Network Surge

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
Pirate Bay Crackdown Drives Virtual Private Network Surge


The use of VPNs as an anonymous file-sharing tool has risen dramatically.

The Pirate Bay took a nasty broadside at the end of April when U.K. courts ordered the country's major ISPs to begin blocking access [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/117001-Court-Orders-UK-ISPs-to-Block-Pirate-Bay] to the site. The ruling was doubtlessly frustrating for some but it's effectiveness as an anti-piracy measure is debatable, as a large number of people who share movies, music and games online have already moved on to better and more anonymous systems.

A study by the Lund University in Sweden found that the number of people aged 15 to 25 who use virtual private networks to share files has risen by 40 percent since 2009, a surge that some people attribute to the success of efforts against sites like The Pirate Bay. VPNs are very effective for anonymous file sharing because they allow users to do so without being detected.

"VPNs could become the next front in the battle against piracy," analyst Mark Mulligan told the BBC [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-17922214].

The crackdown on The Pirate Bay is having an impact, according to the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry, which cited figures showing an 84 percent reduction in TPB usage in Belgium between August and November 2011, and a 74 percent decline in Italy. BTjunkie, which was also blocked in Italy, suffered an 80 percent drop.

"The aim of such blocking is not to turn off the tap but to make it as inconvenient as possible to get to such services," Mulligan said. "VPNs add an extra layer of complexity and young people have to pay £5 or £6 [$8 to $10] a month to use them, which means some of the reasons for doing it are lost."

As for The Pirate Bay itself, it's not giving up quietly. The site posted a message yesterday comparing Western nations to the censorious regimes in Iran, China and Saudi Arabia, and of course offered up some advice to U.K. users about getting around the block.

"Don't forget that we can't allow this shit to happen. Next time they're coming for something else. And yes, there will be a next time if we don't stop them," the message [http://thepiratebay.se/blog] says. "Write to your ISP and tell them to appeal the case. Write to your local MPs and tell them that this is not allowed. Make sure your voice is heard."



Permalink
 

Kargathia

New member
Jul 16, 2009
1,657
0
0
Andy Chalk said:
The crackdown on The Pirate Bay is having an impact, according to the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry, which cited figures showing an 84 percent reduction in TPB usage in Belgium between August and November 2011, and a 74 percent decline in Italy. BTjunkie, which was also blocked in Italy, suffered an 80 percent drop.
And how exactly did they come to this conclusion?
 

Baresark

New member
Dec 19, 2010
3,908
0
0
They are just so stupid. Companies are three steps behind piracy and a thousand steps ahead of government. The never ending cycle is never ending.
 

Loop Stricken

Covered in bees!
Jun 17, 2009
4,723
0
0


Oh noes! This will surely deter anyone intent on pirating material and can only serve to drive up legitimate content purchases!
 

sonofliber

New member
Mar 8, 2010
245
0
0
and now there isnt any more piracy cause as we all know pirate bay was the only sharing site of torrents
 

Loop Stricken

Covered in bees!
Jun 17, 2009
4,723
0
0
It's funny because I already pay Virgin Media to watch all those possible-to-download-illicitly-but-I'm-a-good-boy-so-I-don't TV shows, months later than their US air date.
 

Rainboq

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2009
16,620
0
41
All I can say is "Avast ye scurvy dogs! We've got ourselves some redcoats of the starboard bow! Hoist those sails and make ready fer a fight!"

OT: Yeah, this won't work, nice try BPI.
 

newwiseman

New member
Aug 27, 2010
1,325
0
0
"The aim of such blocking is not to turn off the tap but to make it as inconvenient as possible to get to such services," Mulligan said. "VPNs add an extra layer of complexity and young people have to pay £5 or £6 [$8 to $10] a month to use them, which means some of the reasons for doing it are lost."

Unless they use Tor...

I like how the article says that they want to make things as inconvenient as possible for the pirate instead of offering a more convenient legal option.
 
Apr 28, 2008
14,634
0
0
Loop Stricken said:


Oh noes! This will surely deter anyone intent on pirating material and can only serve to drive up legitimate content purchases!
Yep. Now their profits will SOAR thanks to all the pirates now buying the stuff they used to pirate!
 

Bobic

New member
Nov 10, 2009
1,532
0
0
newwiseman said:
"The aim of such blocking is not to turn off the tap but to make it as inconvenient as possible to get to such services," Mulligan said. "VPNs add an extra layer of complexity and young people have to pay £5 or £6 [$8 to $10] a month to use them, which means some of the reasons for doing it are lost."

Unless they use Tor...

I like how the article says that they want to make things as inconvenient as possible for the pirate instead of offering a more convenient legal option.
That argument seems a bit old. I'm sure it's more convenient to use amazon mp3/itunes to get music, steam/gog/gamersgate for games and netflix for tv and movies. It's just not cheaper to use those things.
 

Lucem712

*Chirp*
Jul 14, 2011
1,472
0
0
So, is this article saying that people have abandoned the Pirate Bay for more anonymous sharing where they can't be seen? How's this a good thing??
 

Formica Archonis

Anonymous Source
Nov 13, 2009
2,312
0
0
Andy Chalk said:
The use of VPNs as an anonymous file-sharing tool has risen dramatically.
Interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.

Andy Chalk said:
"VPNs could become the next front in the battle against piracy," analyst Mark Mulligan told the BBC [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-17922214].
Slight problem with that: VPNs have a lot of legitimate uses.
I use one to secure my communications when using my laptop on public networks.
Companies, big and small, use them a LOT.
Sending video to a stranger in another country. Copyrighted content? Maybe. Or maybe video of a corrupt government's thugs murdering blasphemers or dissenters.

The tools to block copyright infringement are the same as the tools to block speech. I don't want ANY government to have them.
 

MrTub

New member
Mar 12, 2009
1,742
0
0
Lucem712 said:
So, is this article saying that people have abandoned the Pirate Bay for more anonymous sharing where they can't be seen? How's this a good thing??
Except its not being abandoned they simply hide their ip by using a VPN [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_private_network]
"VPNs typically require remote users of the network to be authenticated, and often secure data with firewall and encryption technologies to prevent disclosure of private information to unauthorized parties."
 

lRookiel

Lord of Infinite Grins
Jun 30, 2011
2,821
0
0
I reckon it will be like 2 weeks, then "The pirate dock.org" will be up and running.

Well done government, your so wise :)

That, or people will just use proxy sites.
 

Baresark

New member
Dec 19, 2010
3,908
0
0
I must say, The Pirate Bay was most likely not "lining their pockets" with money because they enable piracy. But people who run VPN's certainly will. Now they will have the proper arguments, but it will be all their fault. And they still won't stop piracy. Go figure.