I will refrain from insulting you and just say you have a very naive worldview.
Also i suggest you study some history (and i dont mean american history) plus some economics so you can have a better understanding of why 3rd world countries are 3rd world countries.[/quote]
Well thanks for not insulting this "naive one".
For the record I've studied quite a bit of history, from a number of perspectives, and have a pretty good grasp of economics. I also happen to follow the gaming industry a bit, as well as issues like patent rights.
I would point out that "The Escapist" itself has done bits on gamers outside of the US/Europe/Japan in the past with mixed messages. As have other sites. A lot of what you've said isn't especially new overall.
Truthfully every country has reasons for the way it's wound up, and heck, I'm one of the first people who will say that there are too many people and not enough resources on the planet (in general). That however does not change the fact that there should be bigger concerns in these regions than gaming.
That said, I do agree with you on the pricing of video games. ANOTHER article here on The Escapist talked about Brazil. It was called "Nation of Pirates" or something like that, and it covered a lot of the same ground that you did, albiet focusing on another part of the world. One notable thing about that was the point that Brazilian crime syndicates were apparently able to make massive fortunes on pirated games, with some of these groups (if I remember) even being able to construct and run their own malls and such.
While not intended I took away from that simply that if that much money is being generated by selling games for roughly $5.00 a pop, even considering development costs (which the pirates do not have) games could be massively cheaper and still generate a decent profit margin.
The Escapist also once did an interview with the head of the 1C company (Russian) which talked about his profit margins on an average game, and how much extra money he could take as pure profit by cutting out packaging, distribution, etc... as part of embracing digital distribution. No mention was made of lowering prices though, and that there also pointed out that your fundementally correct about what games could cost and still make a profit. It's notcible that the article on Brazil also made a point about the pirate games not being packaged the way they are here (ie being sold in plastic baggies with a self created printout with the game's logo/cover art).
That said however, with all of the concerns in these other countries, and how poor the people are, I don't see anything paticularly "wrong" or "naive" in saying that they should
be concerned about other things than video games.
I'll also be entirely blunt in saying that internal problems can't typically be resolved/changed by external force. This is why the way we (the US) are approaching things like "The War On Terror" aren't going so well. You can't occupy and "win the peace" this way (I won't go into my overall opinions on the conflict). Simply put problems with a nation or culture have to be resolved by the people themselves even if painful and bloody. Despite what someone might think, you can't reasonably swoop in as a foreign power, change things, and expect it to work. Even the people who hate the current regime are going to tend to resist that.
Hence why I comment that the people would find their time better spent trying to change things. Oh sure, I understand that in some countries this can be very dangerous. But it doesn't change the fact that the people have to do it themselves, and yeah... while these nations might not ever become wealthy first world countries, I think a lot of places in the third world could be a lot better off than they are now... and chances are then the situation with video games and such could be a lot differant.