256 multi-player! Holy crap!!

Overlord Moo

New member
Apr 10, 2009
343
0
0
Yes, you read the title right. Zipper (the people who made SOCOM) are curently making MAG, a multi-player only, PS3 *sigh* exclusive title. It supports 256 person matchs, 3 factions, and a whole lot of ass-kicking fun...hopefully.
 

DeleteMe1112311

New member
Sep 18, 2008
394
0
0
Great, I hate to be the dark cloud here but the PS3 online player base is very small though. This is going to make finding 255 other people a very, very long and annoying process I suspect. But I'd be happy to be proven wrong.
 

Smurfy 0151

New member
Apr 8, 2009
180
0
0
Soxfan1016 said:
Great, I hate to be the dark cloud here but the PS3 online player base is very small though. This is going to make finding 255 other people a very, very long and annoying process I suspect. But I'd be happy to be proven wrong.
While this statement is true, I would love to see that in action
 

Overlord Moo

New member
Apr 10, 2009
343
0
0
Soxfan1016 said:
Great, I hate to be the dark cloud here but the PS3 online player base is very small though. This is going to make finding 255 other people a very, very long and annoying process I suspect. But I'd be happy to be proven wrong.
I heard they're throwing out the traditional system for a different one. Don't ask what it is cause I don't know.
 

Inco

Swarm Agent
Sep 12, 2008
1,117
0
0
Lag city is all i can say, some games with just 18 people in it are laggy to hell, 256 will kill my connection.
 

DeleteMe1112311

New member
Sep 18, 2008
394
0
0
Smurfy 0151 said:
Soxfan1016 said:
Great, I hate to be the dark cloud here but the PS3 online player base is very small though. This is going to make finding 255 other people a very, very long and annoying process I suspect. But I'd be happy to be proven wrong.
While this statement is true, I would love to see that in action
As would I, I'm not a fanboy for any console (at least I don't think so) and I'm hoping for the best for them. I'm perfectly fine being wrong because it would give the PS3 a definite use for its superior hardware.
 

phar

New member
Jan 29, 2009
643
0
0
The online PS3 player base inst that small. Finding enough players will be no sweat. It obviously wont be done by dedicated servers.
 

ElArabDeMagnifico

New member
Dec 20, 2007
3,775
0
0
This is going to have to be set up like an MMO. Seriously, no one is going to make lobbies with 256 people. You probably can't even fit that many people on your friends list.
 

mcgooch

New member
Jan 24, 2009
124
0
0
It will be amazing if it works. I'm really looking ford to it but I can't help but be skeptical about it's success. There are a few obstacles to overcome for example how would you be able to control glitchers and laggers when there's 256 people. Hopefully they pull it off because I'd love to play the game I hope it will be.
 

Twilight_guy

Sight, Sound, and Mind
Nov 24, 2008
7,131
0
0
256 players? Cluster fuck is the only word that could accurately describe that. 36 man servers in TF2 is bad enough with 256 guys you have the potential for absolute mayhem and more shrapnel flying through the air then an exploding pointing objects factory.
 

stompy

New member
Jan 21, 2008
2,951
0
0
ElArabDeMagnifico said:
This is going to have to be set up like an MMO. Seriously, no one is going to make lobbies with 256 people. You probably can't even fit that many people on your friends list.
I thought it was going to be set up like Battlefield, only with a fuckload more people playing.

Hopefully, it works, since it seems like a good idea. Obviously, the developers will have to try something new, since 128 v. 128, with no additional structure, is going to be absolute mayhem.
 

TZer0

New member
Jan 22, 2008
543
0
0
CoD4/CoD:WaW: artillery says hi. I wonder how many kills one barrage would get on a small map.
 

sneakypenguin

Elite Member
Legacy
Jul 31, 2008
2,804
0
41
Country
usa
This won't turn out too well. Levels will have to be huge, and as such prolly pretty plain. If you can get 100+ people to even remotely work together then your ungodly, I just don't see it happening. I bet it just turns out as a bunch of 8v8 games on the same map.
 

JohnSmith

New member
Jan 19, 2009
411
0
0
This thread has been done.

On topic; If they avoid the lag, shoddy matchmaking, poor team balancing, and idiots who won't work as a team then it should be cool. Now I just have to go shoot one of those damn flying pigs for dinner.
 

lukey94

New member
Sep 2, 2008
404
0
0
well it will only get said 256 people in the first few weeks or days =\ that does sound pretty awesome - just one little dent in that though - im pretty sure that lag would be a major issue in this case. Also with 256 people shouting down a headset its gonna be a bit of a clusterfuck in your head. Do like the sound of it however but like I said you wont get 256 people in one match after a while
 

kyle0912

New member
Oct 17, 2008
48
0
0
Who comes up with these ideas? I lag enough when playing TF2 with 36 players, And yet this supposebly isn't going to lag?

Come on... Are the developers of this really that stupid?
 

phar

New member
Jan 29, 2009
643
0
0
Lag wont be an issue it mainly down to netcode or system lag or game engine lag. It will just be battlefield with more players.. not hard to do at all to achieve.