BlogJam of the Week: PS3 Will Pwn by 2011

Russ Pitts

The Boss of You
May 1, 2006
3,240
0
0
BlogJam of the Week: PS3 Will Pwn by 2011

Analyst makes prediction, blogosphere makes headlines, terrorists win.

Yankee Group [http://www.next-gen.biz/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3643&Itemid=2], has seen the future, and that future is Sony.

The group predicts that the PS3 will capture 44 percent of cumulative console sales in North America by 2011, with 30 million units sold. Microsoft is expected to sell nearly 27 million units, taking up 40 percent of the market, while the Wii is forecasted to sell a little over 11 million units, accounting for just 16 percent of the market.

This news, coming hot on the heels of wild predictions already made by practically everyone under the sun (including this editor) that Sony's ailing Blu-Ray gamble, their outrageous asking price for the PS3, Microsoft's one-year lead in securing market share and Nintendo's far more affordable and innovative console would spell the long-standing console king's doom this holiday season.

Meanwhile, using The Escapist's own time-traveling device, I ventured back to March of this year to capture this quote from ? (wait for it) ? Yankee Group analyst Michael Goodman, from newsfactor.com [http://www.newsfactor.com/story.xhtml?story_id=121003W5V60G]:
We will see a manufacturing battle between Microsoft and Sony for the next 12 months or so, with Microsoft pressing its advantage of being first to deliver a next-generation console. Every unit they sell until the launch of PS3 extends the gap that Sony has to close.

If they start shipping in November, Sony will be supply-constrained during the holiday sales period, when about 50 percent to 60 percent of all gaming consoles are purchased. They plan to produce about three million units by the end of December, which means there will be millions of people looking for a new console who won't be able to buy the PS3 and will turn to the Xbox, which will be able to meet demand.
And this one from Bloomberg (Goodman again) [http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000087&sid=aj6R0U2GsnIw&refer=top_world_news]:
There's a lot of advantages that Microsoft has. They're in second-generation software, they have an installed base, they're out before Sony ? This is a fascinating strategic chess match that is going on between Sony and Microsoft. It's punch and counterpunch.
In this piece, Goodman predicts Sony will hold onto 45 percent of the market share for this generation of game consoles, versus 40 percent for Microsoft. Which is a full point lower than his prediction quoted today by Next-Gen.

What does all of this mean? Either market factors are causing a downward shift in the statistical vectoring over at Yankee, or they're just making stuff up.

As much as I respect the opinion of the high-profile analysts, I have to go with Nostradamus [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nostradamus] on the next-gen console wars. According to his predictions, in 2011, the console maker wearing a blue turban (Nintendo) will burn at five and forty degrees (hell will freeze over - grandmas will play videogames) while two leaders (Microsoft and Sony) long shall wage a fruitless war (Xbox360 vs. PS3). One day the two great leaders will be friends and their great powers will be seen to grow (Microsoft will purchase Sony, dogs and cats will live together - total anarchy).

Permalink
 

DrRosenRosen

New member
Aug 15, 2006
30
0
0
I've heard too much Sony backlash to completely buy those predictions, but then again, I'm not an analyst.
 

Bongo Bill

New member
Jul 13, 2006
584
0
0
I think these anaysts are making a key mistake: assuming that the PS3 is the PS2, the Xbox 360 is the Xbox, and the Wii is the Gamecube. They're very much in completely different positions right now. In 2001, it was uncertain whether or not Microsoft would be able to establish a brand. In 2006, they've got a history. In 2001, the PS2 was already out and was priced the same as the competition. In 2006, the PS3 is last to market with an exorbitant price tag. In 2001, Nintendo's third-party support had completely imploded. In 2006, they're snatching up developers like a 400-pound man at a buffet snatches up hors d'oeurves. In 2001, everybody wanted DVD and $200 was cheap for a DVD player. In 2006, most people think DVD is good enough, especially when the alternative is $600. In 2001, the sky was the limit for graphical improvement. In 2006, developers are finally feeling the art costs.
 

Meophist

New member
Jul 11, 2006
51
0
0
Personally, I don't see how anybody can predict what's going to happen in 2011. I don't even see how anybody can accurately predict what's even going to happen a year from now. I've seen most of the information regarding the next-gen consoles that's gone public, but I still don't think there's enough information to see what's going to happen in the future.
 

Goofonian

New member
Jul 14, 2006
393
0
0
Meophist said:
Personally, I don't see how anybody can predict what's going to happen in 2011. I don't even see how anybody can accurately predict what's even going to happen a year from now. I've seen most of the information regarding the next-gen consoles that's gone public, but I still don't think there's enough information to see what's going to happen in the future.
There is an enormous difference between predicting, accurately predicting and seeing what's going to happen in the future. Analysts don't need to be accurate in what they say, as long as enough big budget investors believe them then they still get their paychecks and live to make wild guesses another day.