Wizards Derail Kaiju Combat Kickstarter Over IP Issues

Karloff

New member
Oct 19, 2009
6,474
0
0
Wizards Derail Kaiju Combat Kickstarter Over IP Issues



Wizards of the Coast wants to keep its Kaijudo trademark clear of all impediment.

If you're fond of giant monsters rampaging through cities - and really, who isn't [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/the-big-picture/6283-MovieBobs-Forgotten-Monsters] - you may have picked up on Kaiju Combat, a cheerful Tokyo stomp of a game that has you send forth your monster to battle. It was enjoying a respectable Kickstarter until recently, when Wizards of the Coast stepped in to crush it under the weight of an intellectual property dispute. Lawyers acting on behalf of Wizards claimed that Kaiju Combat was a little too close to its Kaijudo, a CCG that Wizards may, some day, turn into a video game.

Wizards first approached Simon Strange, owner of Sunstone Games and the originator of his Kickstarter derailed [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpLE_sJU_R0] at the eleventh hour by this dispute.

"I initially interpreted the [first] message as a lawyer being thorough and covering their client's trademark," Strange told Games Politics. "Obnoxious, but not something I needed to get upset about or talk about in public." Then things got messy, and Strange was forced to make the issue public. He still doesn't think that Wizards actually cares very much about Kaiju Combat, and sees this more as legal hairsplitting cooked up by lawyers, who feel they need to rattle sabres or lose any chance of defending Wizards' trademark in the future.

Strange knows he can't justify spending development money on fighting a trademark claim. "But at the same time it would really make me sad if we're forced to change our name just because we can't afford to defend ourselves," he says. "I'm still hopeful that it won't come to that."

Source: Games Politics [http://www.gamepolitics.com/2013/03/21/kaiju-combat-kickstarter-suspended-over-trademark-infringement-claim#.UUxUhFekaM3]


Permalink
 

Owyn_Merrilin

New member
May 22, 2010
7,370
0
0
Oh for god's sake, IP law needs to die. "Kaiju" is a generic term for Japanese monster movies. It has absolutely nothing to do with Wizard's trademark on "Kaijudo," which isn't even the name of the game -- that would be "Duel Masters." Kaijudo is the name they used in the anime about it, just like Yu-Gi-Oh refers to the card game as "Duel Monsters" on the show[footnote]which, speaking of trademark infringement, Wizards...[/footnote], but the real life card game is just "Yu Gi Oh."
 

CJ1145

Elite Member
Jan 6, 2009
4,051
0
41
Trying to lay a trademark on the word "kaiju" makes about as much sense as laying down a trademark on the word "fish". It's not a description of any individual IP, it's a fucking word in the language.
 

tautologico

e^(i * pi) + 1 = 0
Apr 5, 2010
725
0
0
Owyn_Merrilin said:
Oh for god's sake, IP law needs to die. "Kaiju" is a generic term for Japanese monster movies. It has absolutely nothing to do with Wizard's trademark on "Kaijudo," which isn't even the name of the game -- that would be "Duel Masters." Kaijudo is the name they used in the anime about it, just like Yu-Gi-Oh refers to the card game as "Duel Monsters" on the show[footnote]which, speaking of trademark infringement, Wizards...[/footnote], but the real life card game is just "Yu Gi Oh."
It's trademark law, not IP law, and it's the same issue with the Scrolls/Elder Scrolls thing that happened between Bethesda and Mojang. It's idiotic, but it's not the fault of the companies, because they can be seen as not protecting their trademark if they don't do anything, so they are forced to legal action.
 

Monsterfurby

New member
Mar 7, 2008
871
0
0
CJ1145 said:
Trying to lay a trademark on the word "kaiju" makes about as much sense as laying down a trademark on the word "fish". It's not a description of any individual IP, it's a fucking word in the language.
Well it's more like trying to sue someone over the use of words like "Action", "Horror" or "Western" in the title of their movie/game/whatever. It's not just a word in the language, it's explicitly a generic term in the exact context in which it is used.

The entire "Space Marines" affair made more sense than this...
 

tautologico

e^(i * pi) + 1 = 0
Apr 5, 2010
725
0
0
CJ1145 said:
Trying to lay a trademark on the word "kaiju" makes about as much sense as laying down a trademark on the word "fish". It's not a description of any individual IP, it's a fucking word in the language.
They're not claiming a trademark on "Kaiju", they're doing that as an obligatory measure to protect their "Kaijudo" trademark, otherwise they could lose it in the future. It's the same thing with Bethesda vs. Mojang over the latter's "Scrolls" game. Bethesda doesn't own the word "Scrolls", but it was forced to act because of trademark laws. The laws are the problem here, not individual companies.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
ITT: people who don't understand why Wizards are involved, but are yelling at them anyway.

tautologico said:
It's trademark law, not IP law
Trademark IS IP. IP stands for "intellectual property," which refers to trademarks as well as patents, copyright and more.
 

Owyn_Merrilin

New member
May 22, 2010
7,370
0
0
tautologico said:
Owyn_Merrilin said:
Oh for god's sake, IP law needs to die. "Kaiju" is a generic term for Japanese monster movies. It has absolutely nothing to do with Wizard's trademark on "Kaijudo," which isn't even the name of the game -- that would be "Duel Masters." Kaijudo is the name they used in the anime about it, just like Yu-Gi-Oh refers to the card game as "Duel Monsters" on the show[footnote]which, speaking of trademark infringement, Wizards...[/footnote], but the real life card game is just "Yu Gi Oh."
It's trademark law, not IP law, and it's the same issue with the Scrolls/Elder Scrolls thing that happened between Bethesda and Mojang. It's idiotic, but it's not the fault of the companies, because they can be seen as not protecting their trademark if they don't do anything, so they are forced to legal action.
Actually, it is IP law. Trademarks, copyrights, and patents are the three major forms of IP. Therefore, Trademark law is a part of IP law. My point is we need to scrap all of it, because at this point it's doing the exact opposite of what it's supposed to do. And like I said, they aren't even defending their trademark. Their trademark is on Kaijudo, not Kaiju. Kaiju is the name for a genre of monster movies which predates Kaijudo by about 50 years.
 

tautologico

e^(i * pi) + 1 = 0
Apr 5, 2010
725
0
0
Owyn_Merrilin said:
tautologico said:
Owyn_Merrilin said:
Oh for god's sake, IP law needs to die. "Kaiju" is a generic term for Japanese monster movies. It has absolutely nothing to do with Wizard's trademark on "Kaijudo," which isn't even the name of the game -- that would be "Duel Masters." Kaijudo is the name they used in the anime about it, just like Yu-Gi-Oh refers to the card game as "Duel Monsters" on the show[footnote]which, speaking of trademark infringement, Wizards...[/footnote], but the real life card game is just "Yu Gi Oh."
It's trademark law, not IP law, and it's the same issue with the Scrolls/Elder Scrolls thing that happened between Bethesda and Mojang. It's idiotic, but it's not the fault of the companies, because they can be seen as not protecting their trademark if they don't do anything, so they are forced to legal action.
Actually, it is IP law. Trademarks, copyrights, and patents are the three major forms of IP. Therefore, Trademark law is a part of IP law. My point is we need to scrap all of it, because at this point it's doing the exact opposite of what it's supposed to do. And like I said, they aren't even defending their trademark. Their trademark is on Kaijudo, not Kaiju. Kaiju predates Kaijudo by about 50 years.
I stand corrected about IP law, I guess it was a reflex over people commonly calling it a copyright issue.

I'm not a lawyer, but I think they are trying to defend their trademark, and not just be jerks. The word "Scrolls" predate "Elder Scrolls" by much longer, and even so the analyses I've read at the time by people who knew about the subject were almost all unanimous in saying that Bethesda had to try and defend their trademark, even though they had no claim over the word "Scrolls", because of the similarity of theme, and both products being on the same medium (computer/video games) and what not. I think it's reasonable to say that this game on KS and a potential Kaijudo game by Wizards would be very similar indeed, so they are probably compelled to action just as Bethesda was.
 

Owyn_Merrilin

New member
May 22, 2010
7,370
0
0
tautologico said:
Owyn_Merrilin said:
tautologico said:
Owyn_Merrilin said:
Oh for god's sake, IP law needs to die. "Kaiju" is a generic term for Japanese monster movies. It has absolutely nothing to do with Wizard's trademark on "Kaijudo," which isn't even the name of the game -- that would be "Duel Masters." Kaijudo is the name they used in the anime about it, just like Yu-Gi-Oh refers to the card game as "Duel Monsters" on the show[footnote]which, speaking of trademark infringement, Wizards...[/footnote], but the real life card game is just "Yu Gi Oh."
It's trademark law, not IP law, and it's the same issue with the Scrolls/Elder Scrolls thing that happened between Bethesda and Mojang. It's idiotic, but it's not the fault of the companies, because they can be seen as not protecting their trademark if they don't do anything, so they are forced to legal action.
Actually, it is IP law. Trademarks, copyrights, and patents are the three major forms of IP. Therefore, Trademark law is a part of IP law. My point is we need to scrap all of it, because at this point it's doing the exact opposite of what it's supposed to do. And like I said, they aren't even defending their trademark. Their trademark is on Kaijudo, not Kaiju. Kaiju predates Kaijudo by about 50 years.
I stand corrected about IP law, I guess it was a reflex over people commonly calling it a copyright issue.

I'm not a lawyer, but I think they are trying to defend their trademark, and not just be jerks. The word "Scrolls" predate "Elder Scrolls" by much longer, and even so the analyses I've read at the time by people who knew about the subject were almost all unanimous in saying that Bethesda had to try and defend their trademark, even though they had no claim over the word "Scrolls", because of the similarity of theme, and both products being on the same medium (computer/video games) and what not. I think it's reasonable to say that this game on KS and a potential Kaijudo game by Wizards would be very similar indeed, so they are probably compelled to action just as Bethesda was.
See, I don't see a similarity here at all. Kaiju Combat is a fighting game from what I can gather. Duel Monsters (which is the actual name of the game that the Kaijudo trademark goes with, and is itself a darn near trademark infringing knockoff of YuGiOh) is a trading card game. There is next to no chance that a potential Duel Monsters game would be any thing like Kaiju Combat. For that matter, Scrolls didn't have all that much in common with The Elder Scrolls, but it was much less of a jump than the jump from a fighting game to a trading card game.
 

tautologico

e^(i * pi) + 1 = 0
Apr 5, 2010
725
0
0
Owyn_Merrilin said:
tautologico said:
Owyn_Merrilin said:
tautologico said:
Owyn_Merrilin said:
Oh for god's sake, IP law needs to die. "Kaiju" is a generic term for Japanese monster movies. It has absolutely nothing to do with Wizard's trademark on "Kaijudo," which isn't even the name of the game -- that would be "Duel Masters." Kaijudo is the name they used in the anime about it, just like Yu-Gi-Oh refers to the card game as "Duel Monsters" on the show[footnote]which, speaking of trademark infringement, Wizards...[/footnote], but the real life card game is just "Yu Gi Oh."
It's trademark law, not IP law, and it's the same issue with the Scrolls/Elder Scrolls thing that happened between Bethesda and Mojang. It's idiotic, but it's not the fault of the companies, because they can be seen as not protecting their trademark if they don't do anything, so they are forced to legal action.
Actually, it is IP law. Trademarks, copyrights, and patents are the three major forms of IP. Therefore, Trademark law is a part of IP law. My point is we need to scrap all of it, because at this point it's doing the exact opposite of what it's supposed to do. And like I said, they aren't even defending their trademark. Their trademark is on Kaijudo, not Kaiju. Kaiju predates Kaijudo by about 50 years.
I stand corrected about IP law, I guess it was a reflex over people commonly calling it a copyright issue.

I'm not a lawyer, but I think they are trying to defend their trademark, and not just be jerks. The word "Scrolls" predate "Elder Scrolls" by much longer, and even so the analyses I've read at the time by people who knew about the subject were almost all unanimous in saying that Bethesda had to try and defend their trademark, even though they had no claim over the word "Scrolls", because of the similarity of theme, and both products being on the same medium (computer/video games) and what not. I think it's reasonable to say that this game on KS and a potential Kaijudo game by Wizards would be very similar indeed, so they are probably compelled to action just as Bethesda was.
See, I don't see a similarity here at all. Kaiju Combat is a fighting game from what I can gather. Duel Monsters (which is the actual name of the game that the Kaijudo trademark goes with, and is itself a darn near trademark infringing knockoff of YuGiOh) is a trading card game. There is next to no chance that a potential Duel Monsters game would be any thing like Kaiju Combat. For that matter, Scrolls didn't have all that much in common with The Elder Scrolls, but it was much less of a jump than the jump from a fighting game to a trading card game.
I'm really out of my field here, but my guess is that lawyers wouldn't get hang up on details about game genres. The theme is quite similar, both would have giant monsters stomping on Tokyo and so on, so for someone who is not a gamer the two games would seem very similar, I guess, even though they could play very differently. But I really don't know, so you may be right.
 

Owyn_Merrilin

New member
May 22, 2010
7,370
0
0
tautologico said:
Owyn_Merrilin said:
tautologico said:
Owyn_Merrilin said:
tautologico said:
Owyn_Merrilin said:
Oh for god's sake, IP law needs to die. "Kaiju" is a generic term for Japanese monster movies. It has absolutely nothing to do with Wizard's trademark on "Kaijudo," which isn't even the name of the game -- that would be "Duel Masters." Kaijudo is the name they used in the anime about it, just like Yu-Gi-Oh refers to the card game as "Duel Monsters" on the show[footnote]which, speaking of trademark infringement, Wizards...[/footnote], but the real life card game is just "Yu Gi Oh."
It's trademark law, not IP law, and it's the same issue with the Scrolls/Elder Scrolls thing that happened between Bethesda and Mojang. It's idiotic, but it's not the fault of the companies, because they can be seen as not protecting their trademark if they don't do anything, so they are forced to legal action.
Actually, it is IP law. Trademarks, copyrights, and patents are the three major forms of IP. Therefore, Trademark law is a part of IP law. My point is we need to scrap all of it, because at this point it's doing the exact opposite of what it's supposed to do. And like I said, they aren't even defending their trademark. Their trademark is on Kaijudo, not Kaiju. Kaiju predates Kaijudo by about 50 years.
I stand corrected about IP law, I guess it was a reflex over people commonly calling it a copyright issue.

I'm not a lawyer, but I think they are trying to defend their trademark, and not just be jerks. The word "Scrolls" predate "Elder Scrolls" by much longer, and even so the analyses I've read at the time by people who knew about the subject were almost all unanimous in saying that Bethesda had to try and defend their trademark, even though they had no claim over the word "Scrolls", because of the similarity of theme, and both products being on the same medium (computer/video games) and what not. I think it's reasonable to say that this game on KS and a potential Kaijudo game by Wizards would be very similar indeed, so they are probably compelled to action just as Bethesda was.
See, I don't see a similarity here at all. Kaiju Combat is a fighting game from what I can gather. Duel Monsters (which is the actual name of the game that the Kaijudo trademark goes with, and is itself a darn near trademark infringing knockoff of YuGiOh) is a trading card game. There is next to no chance that a potential Duel Monsters game would be any thing like Kaiju Combat. For that matter, Scrolls didn't have all that much in common with The Elder Scrolls, but it was much less of a jump than the jump from a fighting game to a trading card game.
I'm really out of my field here, but my guess is that lawyers wouldn't get hang up on details about game genres. The theme is quite similar, both would have giant monsters stomping on Tokyo and so on, so for someone who is not a gamer the two games would seem very similar, I guess, even though they could play very differently. But I really don't know, so you may be right.
I see what you're saying, but Kaijudo doesn't even have the giant monsters stomping on Tokyo thing going for it. It's literally a YuGiOh knockoff, a particularly blatant one that came out right at the height of YuGiOh's popularity. The worst part about all this is that they intentionally named it Duel Masters to confuse kids into thinking it was YuGiOh, which on the show and in the manga called the game "Duel Monsters." See the similarities there? Yet they didn't get sued by Konami over it, despite there being a lot of money involved on both ends. I really don't see how it could be something obligatory if Konami ignored something that blatant, while Wizards is going after something so tenuous, especially since the IP they're supposedly trying to protect is the one that is so blatantly infringing on Konami's IP. It really looks like they're trying to shake these guys down for money because they're too small to afford the lawyers and legal fees.
 

Chessrook44

Senior Member
Legacy
Feb 11, 2009
559
3
23
Country
United States
A friend of mine was upset about Kaiju Combat and wanted it to die because certain furries had put enough money into their Kickstarter to get their own (seemingly dull and bland) characters into the game.

This same friend has just said he is not buying anything Wizards of the Coast anymore because of this.

Make of that what you will.
 

Owyn_Merrilin

New member
May 22, 2010
7,370
0
0
Desert Punk said:
New way to settle IP disputes:

The losers legal team are all shot in the head directly after the trial. Legal teams will be VERY careful about who they take to court because if they lose its their heads, and it has the added benefit of getting id of more lawyers, which is never a bad prospect! :p
Make it so it only happens if the plaintiff loses, and I'd just about be willing to sign on to this. Otherwise, you'd have lawyers suing people just to get their rivals killed off :p
 

Hitchmeister

New member
Nov 24, 2009
453
0
0
Owyn_Merrilin said:
Oh for god's sake, IP law needs to die. "Kaiju" is a generic term for Japanese monster movies.
Very much this. This is getting annoyingly close to Tim "Edge" Langdell territory.
 

Entitled

New member
Aug 27, 2012
1,254
0
0
Desert Punk said:
New way to settle IP disputes:

The losers legal team are all shot in the head directly after the trial. Legal teams will be VERY careful about who they take to court because if they lose its their heads, and it has the added benefit of getting id of more lawyers, which is never a bad prospect! :p
Make it so that the winner's legal team are shot in the head as well.