Nintendo Triumphs in Patent Infringement Lawsuit

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
Nintendo Triumphs in Patent Infringement Lawsuit


Nintendo has come out on top of another Wii-related patent infringement lawsuit.

In 2010, Nintendo found itself at the wrong end of a patent infringement lawsuit brought by IA Labs, an "interactive fitness company," which claimed that the Wii Fit, Wii Fit Plus and other Wii peripherals infringed upon two of its patents. IA Labs further stated it had contacted Nintendo about the possible infringement in 2007 and had offered to license its technology to the game maker, but those overtures apparently went nowhere.

A judge dismissed the suit in 2012 and now the U.S Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has upheld that ruling, presumably delivering final victory to Nintendo in the process. "We are very pleased with the court's decision," said Nintendo of America Deputy General Counsel Richard Medway. "Nintendo has a long history of developing innovative products while respecting the intellectual property rights of others. We also vigorously defend patent lawsuits, like the IA Labs lawsuit, when we firmly believe that we have not infringed another party's patent."

The court also ordered IA Labs to pay more than $236,000 for Nintendo's legal fees - pocket change for an outfit like Nintendo, perhaps, but likely a more painful amount for a small fitness technology company in Maryland.


Permalink
 

Owyn_Merrilin

New member
May 22, 2010
7,370
0
0
Considering the way these cases usually go, it's probably generous to even call them a "fitness company." Smells like a patent troll just picked on the wrong billy goat, to me.
 

The White Hunter

Basment Abomination
Oct 19, 2011
3,888
0
0
Seems like a patent troll picked on the wrong company to me....

Not like Reggie has time to deal with no patent trolls.
 

Skops

New member
Mar 9, 2010
820
0
0
Like my prof told us many times in Game Design school; "Never go to court with Nintendo.."
 

Zipa

batlh bIHeghjaj.
Dec 19, 2010
1,489
0
0
Yeah looks like this patent troll came unstuck. You can't call foul on a technology that happens to have a similar concept as your own. We wouldn't have more than one manufacturer of car or smartphone or pretty much every other product otherwise.
 

Chaosian

New member
Mar 26, 2011
224
0
0
I'm glad Nintendo won the lawsuit, but god-damn, practically $250,000 in damages? That's harsh.
 

wetfart

New member
Jul 11, 2010
307
0
0
Why was the case dismissed originally?

And does anyone know if the plantiff's patents were invalidated?
 

Abomination

New member
Dec 17, 2012
2,939
0
0
Good, suck a fat one, IA Labs.

Nice to see a lawsuit like this finally concluding in a rational manner.
 

CrystalShadow

don't upset the insane catgirl
Apr 11, 2009
3,829
0
0
Chaosian said:
I'm glad Nintendo won the lawsuit, but god-damn, practically $250,000 in damages? That's harsh.
Well... It doesn't actually even appear to be that, because that implies you are paying for the harm you caused another.
Legal costs are not damages as such as far as I understand it.

So really, they got of pretty lightly if all they're having to pay is Nintendo's legal bills. (Not that a legal bill of that size is a laughing matter, but still).