The Last of Us Almost Had a Different Ending (Spoilers)

StewShearerOld

Geekdad News Writer
Jan 5, 2013
5,449
0
0
The Last of Us Almost Had a Different Ending (Spoilers)



(Spoiler Warning) According to creative director Neil Druckmann, the game's ending was originally meant to strike a different emotional chord.

Warning: The following contains severe spoilers for The Last of Us. Do not read this article unless you've played the game.

<a href=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/editorials/reviews/10366-The-Last-of-Us-Review-A-New-Apocalypse>The Last of Us may stand the test of time as one of the first games that had the guts to go truly and utterly dark. Whereas other games will bounce back and forth between notes of silly and serious, there are few moments of levity in the game. Rather, it embraces a tone of ever intensifying desolation. Things never get better, they only get worse.

The climax of the game's bleakness is easily its ending. Joel learns that Ellie, who is immune to the pandemic that has ravaged the world, needs to have her brain removed so scientists can reverse engineer a cure. Unable to resolve himself to the loss of the young woman he's come to view as a daughter, he instead fights his way through a hospital filled with people who's only crime is trying to save the world. He saves Ellie, dooming humanity in the process. The game then ends with Joel lying to a suspicious Ellie about what transpired while she was knocked out for the surgery.

However, according to Neil Druckmann, creative director for The Last of Us, Naughty Dog had originally intended the game to end on a more hopeful note. "We knew Joel would lie to Ellie, but she believed the lie, one hundred percent," said Druckmann. "There wasn't any doubt there, and they would be arriving in Tommy's town, and you kind of get the idea that everything's gonna be fine and dandy." Despite having these plans in place, Druckmann and his team eventually found themselves moving toward the darker ending the game would run with. "As we got closer and closer to shooting that scene, it stopped feeling honest...She had such a good bullshit detector that it didn't feel like she would buy it. Or at least not buy it so easily. And then the scene kind of grew out of that, that there would be a kind of final challenge."

While many were left somewhat mired by the moral ambiguity of the game's ending, we honestly can't imagine it any other way. Even so, in an industry where such story moments are rare, one can only imagine it must have been a struggle to choose such an ending and then maintain the courage to run with it.

Source: <a href=http://kotaku.com/the-last-of-us-climactic-moments-could-have-been-very-600685013>Kotaku


Permalink
 

AxelxGabriel

New member
Nov 13, 2009
175
0
0
I hated this game. I really did. It was just so god damn depressing that it was just a friggen chore to get through. It wasn't FUN. I found myself forcing myself to get to the ending.Ever hear of the trope "Darkness Induced Audience Apathy"? That fits this game to a T and I hope to never play it again.
 

antigodoflife

New member
Nov 12, 2009
521
0
0
Not really a fan of the ending myself. Made Joel out to be... well...

If you wanted to go truly desolate you take Ellie's brain, not only does it not work, it creates a virus far worst than before but alas they made Joel look like a sociopath, kidnapped the worlds only chance for survival making everything from this point Joel's fault and now Ellie is with someone who is far more dangerous than say Ethan (leader of the cannibals,) not to mention Joel essentially thinks of her as Sarah. The saving grace is that Ellie picks up on it.

I'm just hoping Ellie kills Joel in The Last Of Us 2.
 

toomuchnothing

New member
Jul 5, 2010
160
0
0
Tenmar said:
Okay first off, no the game doesn't exactly end stating that humanity is going to go extinct because of Joel's decision. Second, that is only ONE part of the world in terms of their apocalypse. What about Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia? It certainly is a sorta grim ending but you really put too much emphasis on the outcome of Joel's decision.
I agree with this. Christ I'm only a second year nursing student and even I cringed at how flimsy their excuse was to kill Ellie. We have vaccines that can wipe out diseases TODAY and even with all our infrastructure and technology we simply don't have the means to do so and you're going to tell me you can reverse engineer a vaccine from a mutated spore your going to kill once you kill the girl its in and presto chango everyone is cool?

As for the fireflies trying to only save the world I think the game did a fine job illustrating how other rebellions had gone in Quarintine zones with soldiers being hung up as warning signs or burned alive for what eventually became organized bandit parties. The idea that the fireflies wouldn't use the cure as leverage to secure power seems naive at best. I've even read some pieces from columnists on game websites say that Marlene is a hero for doing what Joel would not. Last I check it wasn't her sacrifice to make it is Ellie's. Marlene even uses the excuse that its what Ellie would want yet the first time Ellie wakes up after is after Joel escapes with her meaning they had kept her sedated. Joel isn't a hero by any stretch but I don't think anyone else in the game is either.
 

Busard

New member
Nov 17, 2009
168
0
0
antigodoflife said:
If you wanted to go truly desolate you take Ellie's brain, not only does it not work, it creates a virus far worst than before but alas they made Joel look like a sociopath, kidnapped the worlds only chance for survival making everything from this point Joel's fault and now Ellie is with someone who is far more dangerous than say Ethan, not to mention Joel essentially thinks of her as Sarah. The saving grace is that Ellie picks it up.

I'm just hoping Ellie kills Joel in The Last Of Us 2.
Three things

1) Who said the fireflies would've actually been succesful ? Even TODAY in our real world, medicine is struggling to find cures for actual fungal infection with 30-40% mortality rate. How to expect a rag tag assembled team of scientists would ever achieve to reverse engineer a cure

2) Joel is not a hero, never presented as such. His only goal is survival, and yes his choice was selfish but at least it made the ending actually interesting and not cliche

3) Humanity is so beyond fucked at this point I'd doubt that even if they managed to make a cure, it would've been of any good.
 

Steve Waltz

New member
May 16, 2012
273
0
0
And think... It all would have been OK if Marlene would have just let Ellie wake up and tell Joel her choice; humanity would have been saved. Ellie may have been a kid, but if Marlene was so sure that "it's what she would want" then Marlene should have let Ellie wake up and make her own choice. Joel may be psychotic, but Marlene was the one that made the bad choice that set him off.
 

Raggedstar

New member
Jul 5, 2011
753
0
0
Meh, not a huge difference. I was expecting something much bigger, like Joel actually surrendering Ellie and having humanity be restored, or something like the ending of The Walking Dead.

But whatever, the ending is fine the way it is (better than fine, actually). Good call. Ellie really does have a good bullshit detector, and there's something about being drugged, leaving without seeing the Fireflies, and waking up in a gown that would make her think that SOMETHING happened. No saying hi to Malene or her buddies? Not only that, but why would it take 20 years for people to step forward and say "hey, there's lots of people like us that are immune to this stuff" and they would eventually find the Fireflies and agree to assist in research. It wouldn't make sense having her believe the lie and have everything be hunky-dory.
 

freakonaleash

Wheat field gazer
Jan 3, 2009
329
0
0
I think the ending was perfect in how it truly showed what Joel was willing to do to survive. Such a good ending.
 

lucky_sharm

New member
Aug 27, 2009
846
0
0
AxelxGabriel said:
I hated this game. I really did. It was just so god damn depressing that it was just a friggen chore to get through. It wasn't FUN. I found myself forcing myself to get to the ending.Ever hear of the trope "Darkness Induced Audience Apathy"? That fits this game to a T and I hope to never play it again.
antigodoflife said:
Not really a fan of the ending myself. Made Joel out to be... well...

If you wanted to go truly desolate you take Ellie's brain, not only does it not work, it creates a virus far worst than before but alas they made Joel look like a sociopath, kidnapped the worlds only chance for survival making everything from this point Joel's fault and now Ellie is with someone who is far more dangerous than say Ethan (leader of the cannibals,) not to mention Joel essentially thinks of her as Sarah. The saving grace is that Ellie picks up on it.

I'm just hoping Ellie kills Joel in The Last Of Us 2.
No cure is ever mentioned. Vaccine. Aside from the logistical nightmare that would distributing a vaccine in a world already reclaimed by nature and overrun by cannibals, bandits, and despotic military, you'd have to be a complete sucker to believe that the Fireflies have good intentions. They're just another group of survivors looking out for themselves, albeit more delusional.

Elle is the last innocent we see in the narrative. I've said my peace in another thread about how the authors go into great detail to show that EVERYTHING Joel goes through is to prepare him to save Elle. He turned in his humanity card when he protected his brother and was potentially as bad as David and the bandits. He is what he is and he's been hardened to deal with it.

Elle is not. Despite her condition and loss, she's still an innocent. The wild animals and childlike behavior show she still is the "Last of us". Unlike her foil in the narrative who gets any innocence crushed out of him by his older brother and then goes mushroom.

We can go into debates as to if Elle acts as the actual redemption for Joel or if he's still lost. He seems to reconcile his loss and his past at the end when he brings Elle to a town where something like her might flourish as long as monsters like him guard the walls. That's the beginning of any new society.
 

Imp_Emissary

Mages Rule, and Dragons Fly!
Legacy
May 2, 2011
2,315
1
43
Country
United States
Steve Waltz said:
And think... It all would have been OK if Marlene would have just let Ellie wake up and tell Joel her choice; humanity would have been saved. Ellie may have been a kid, but if Marlene was so sure that "it's what she would want" then Marlene should have let Ellie wake up and make her own choice. Joel may be psychotic, but Marlene was the one that made the bad choice that set him off.
THIS. So much this.

If they let Ellie actually get a choice, then she probably would have said yes. Even if she said no, they could have had her stay there until she was older(a lot older) and soon to die anyway. Then they could have done the operation. Plus, they would be sure the new form of the fungus didn't just kill people later.

Hell, while they waited, they could have done some tests, and maybe found a way to do it without killing her.
Besides. What if they get it wrong? You take a goose who lays golden eggs, and cut her head off!

Also, the Fireflies were evil pricks. You read in Marlene's journal that they wanted to kill Joel, but Marlene told them not to.
 

Phrozenflame500

New member
Dec 26, 2012
1,080
0
0
Steve Waltz said:
And think... It all would have been OK if Marlene would have just let Ellie wake up and tell Joel her choice; humanity would have been saved. Ellie may have been a kid, but if Marlene was so sure that "it's what she would want" then Marlene should have let Ellie wake up and make her own choice. Joel may be psychotic, but Marlene was the one that made the bad choice that set him off.
Imp Emissary said:
If they let Ellie actually get a choice, then she probably would have said yes. Even if she said no, they could have had her stay there until she was older(a lot older) and soon to die anyway. Then they could have done the operation. Plus, they would be sure the new form of the fungus didn't just kill people later.

Hell, while they waited, they could have done some tests, and maybe found a way to do it without killing her.
Besides. What if they get it wrong? You take a goose who lays golden eggs, and cut her head off!
Seconded, while I did like the ending since it portrayed Joel as flawed and not just "needs-of-the-many-always-right-superhero", if the fireflies weren't completely retarded it probably wouldn't have happened that way.
 

Zhukov

The Laughing Arsehole
Dec 29, 2009
13,769
5
43
That wouldn't have been that much of a change.

I'm glad they did though, it's certainly an improvement.
 

Goofguy

New member
Nov 25, 2010
3,864
0
0
Phrozenflame500 said:
Steve Waltz said:
And think... It all would have been OK if Marlene would have just let Ellie wake up and tell Joel her choice; humanity would have been saved. Ellie may have been a kid, but if Marlene was so sure that "it's what she would want" then Marlene should have let Ellie wake up and make her own choice. Joel may be psychotic, but Marlene was the one that made the bad choice that set him off.
Imp Emissary said:
If they let Ellie actually get a choice, then she probably would have said yes. Even if she said no, they could have had her stay there until she was older(a lot older) and soon to die anyway. Then they could have done the operation. Plus, they would be sure the new form of the fungus didn't just kill people later.

Hell, while they waited, they could have done some tests, and maybe found a way to do it without killing her.
Besides. What if they get it wrong? You take a goose who lays golden eggs, and cut her head off!
Seconded, while I did like the ending since it portrayed Joel as flawed and not just "needs-of-the-many-always-right-superhero", if the fireflies weren't completely retarded it probably wouldn't have happened that way.
True but that's the whole point. Marlene and the Fireflies were so blinded by their desperation to cure the infection at all costs, they neglected to realize there was a lot more going on. The last time Marlene interacted with the two, she saw an exasperated Joel having to drag the teenager he just met to a safehouse. She assumed that the situation was still the same by the time they got to the hospital, that Joel was only too happy to have the Fireflies take Ellie off of his hands. In their eagerness to immediately sedate and operate on Ellie following her near drowning, they failed to see that a year of traveling together had formed a bond between Ellie and Joel.

Couple this with the fact that Joel never had the chance to properly say goodbye to Sarah and it would have been the exact same scenario with Ellie. Ultimately, Joel's decision was pretty damn selfish yet completely understandable given the circumstances.
 

alphamalet

New member
Nov 29, 2011
544
0
0
I loved this game, but I think its story is getting WAY too much credit. Most of it seemed pretty cliche to me. The gameplay on the other hand was ecxellent and a departure from mechanics that have long been considered industry norms (hooray for no regenerating health).

The Last of Us may stand the test of time as the first game that the guts to go truly and utterly dark. Whereas other games will bounce back and forth between notes of silly and serious, there are few moments of levity in the game. Rather, it embraces a tone of ever intensifying desolation. Things never get better, they only get worse.
Oh, come on man! Has nobody played a Silent Hill game, a Fatal Frame, Spec Ops: The Line or just about any game out of the survival horror genre? You're giving the Last of Us too much credit for something that has been done before and has been done better
 

Lovely Mixture

New member
Jul 12, 2011
1,474
0
0
Raggedstar said:
Meh, not a huge difference. I was expecting something much bigger, like Joel actually surrendering Ellie and having humanity be restored, or something like the ending of The Walking Dead.

But whatever, the ending is fine the way it is (better than fine, actually). Good call. Ellie really does have a good bullshit detector, and there's something about being drugged, leaving without seeing the Fireflies, and waking up in a gown that would make her think that SOMETHING happened. No saying hi to Malene or her buddies? Not only that, but why would it take 20 years for people to step forward and say "hey, there's lots of people like us that are immune to this stuff" and they would eventually find the Fireflies and agree to assist in research. It wouldn't make sense having her believe the lie and have everything be hunky-dory.
100% this. They knew it would have been out of character for Ellie, they made the right call.


antigodoflife said:
Not really a fan of the ending myself. Made Joel out to be... well...

If you wanted to go truly desolate you take Ellie's brain, not only does it not work, it creates a virus far worst than before but alas they made Joel look like a sociopath, kidnapped the worlds only chance for survival making everything from this point Joel's fault and now Ellie is with someone who is far more dangerous than say Ethan (leader of the cannibals,) not to mention Joel essentially thinks of her as Sarah. The saving grace is that Ellie picks up on it.

I'm just hoping Ellie kills Joel in The Last Of Us 2.
Are you being sarcastic? More dangerous than cannibals?
Saving a person who was drugged and gonna be killed while comatose is sociopathic?

The whole point is that the Fireflies were doing the exact same thing that the military did at the beginning of the game.
"For the greater good."

AxelxGabriel said:
I hated this game. I really did. It was just so god damn depressing that it was just a friggen chore to get through. It wasn't FUN. I found myself forcing myself to get to the ending.Ever hear of the trope "Darkness Induced Audience Apathy"? That fits this game to a T and I hope to never play it again.
Out of curiosity, what did you think the game would be like from the title? With a name like "The Last of Us" I'd have been surprised if the game was any other way.
 

Rainboq

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2009
16,620
0
41
AxelxGabriel said:
I hated this game. I really did. It was just so god damn depressing that it was just a friggen chore to get through. It wasn't FUN. I found myself forcing myself to get to the ending.Ever hear of the trope "Darkness Induced Audience Apathy"? That fits this game to a T and I hope to never play it again.
The Last of Us wasn't supposed to be fun, but hey, if melancholy isn't your thing, so be it. This game set out to make you not want to play it again because of its content. Its like Spec Ops: The Line. Its brutal, and it wants you to fully understand the ramifications of your violence.

OT: I'm honestly glad that they went with the ending they did. I wouldn't have liked the other one nearly as much.
 

tippy2k2

Beloved Tyrant
Legacy
Mar 15, 2008
14,717
2,153
118
StewShearer said:
While many were left somewhat mired by the moral ambiguity of the game's ending, we honestly can imagine it any other way.
Um...is that supposed to be "Can't imagine it any other way"? Also, as long as I'm pointing out mistakes to make myself feel like a big man, you have two periods at the end of the article :)

Anyway, I just finished the game about two hours ago and if my Title did not give it away, I absolutely loved this game. I was quite surprised that they ended in this way since Joel is the "good guy" but then you remember; there are no good guys, just survivors.
 

major_chaos

Ruining videogames
Feb 3, 2011
1,314
0
0
Rainboq said:
The Last of Us wasn't supposed to be fun
This game set out to make you not want to play it again because of its content.
Its like Spec Ops: The Line.
it wants you to fully understand the ramifications of your violence.
My sincere thanks, you just saved me sixty dollars.

OT: That really doesn't seem like that much of a change, but I guess if the theme you are going for is "people are shit, the world is shit, and nothing is going to be ok" then you might as well go all the way with it.
 

Rainboq

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2009
16,620
0
41
major_chaos said:
Rainboq said:
The Last of Us wasn't supposed to be fun
This game set out to make you not want to play it again because of its content.
Its like Spec Ops: The Line.
it wants you to fully understand the ramifications of your violence.
My sincere thanks, you just saved me sixty dollars.

OT: That really doesn't seem like that much of a change, but I guess if the theme you are going for is "people are shit, the world is shit, and nothing is going to be ok" then you might as well go all the way with it.
I'd argue you should still play it. Its a very well crafted story, just don't go into it expecting mindless violence. This is a deeply effecting emotional tale. The combat isn't fun in the usual sense, more satisfying that you made it through another tense encounter.