As long as you can commit a couple hours a day to it, you'll more than get your money's worth in the 30 days that comes with the purchase.
The world: progression is linear and not all the world is open yet, but i imagine they will add more to the world as time goes on, kind of like how wow releases a new tier or raids once and awhile to keep things fresh.Tiamat666 said:I'm sorry, but I don't like the review. You describe some general technical and gameplay aspects, as they might interest an average gamer looking to dive into a new MMO. But you're not really talking to the people who are arguably most interested in this game. Namely, the single-player RPG focused Elder Scrolls fanbase. For me, the review doesn't answer the fundamental question if I, as a fan of the franchise, will be able to accept and enjoy this new MMO as a "true" Elder Scrolls experience.
The review doesn't provide answers to any of the really interesting questions:
- The World: can you really explore all of Tamriel? This is something Elder Scrolls players have been dreaming about for ever. What is it like to travel the land? Are there loading times between areas/continents, or is it seamless on the main map, like in the previous ES games? What do the continents look like? Does Skyrim look like Skyrim, Morrowind like Morrowind? Can you go to these places known from previous games and recognize them, see known landmarks, meet known NPCs? What do the new continents and places look like that have not been featured in any previous ES game? Do they fit the lore, are they awesome or do they suck?
- Items and Inventory: do you have this standard progression of weapons and armor from Iron/Leather to Ebony/Glass and Daedric? Is it something entirely different? Do you have these other elements from ES Lore, like Soul Gems, Amulets of Divines, Daedric Artifacts? How does crafting, alchemy, enchanting compare to previous ES titles?
- Lore: does the lore add up to the previous games or can this be considered something new/unrelated/a variation? Do we also have Divines with shrines that can be prayed at? Are there Daedric shrines with quests? Does the plot make any sense at all?
- NPCs: do NPC's feel and behave like in the previous Elder Scrolls games? Do they have schedules and go about their daily business like in Skyrim/Oblivion or are they stucked into position as in Morrowind? How does the conversation system compare? Can you have followers? Can you interact with NPC's or are they simply quest-givers and merchants?
- Gameplay: is there crime-tracking like in previous ES games? Are there factions like Mages Guild and the Dark Brotherhood? Can you cast spells and drink potions and do the mechanics work like in previous ES games or has it all been MMO'ified? Does combat feel as physical and interactive as in the single-player games, or does it feel "floaty" like is typical for MMO's?
The list goes on, but I suppose you get the idea... It would have been nice to get some insights into how this compares to the games we know and love.
You must be new to MMOs.JET1971 said:Paying full price for the game then have a subscription ontop of that is why I will not touch it. So you pay full price to rent the game for 30 days? No thank you. Then have to pay rent every month to continue? Even worse.
If it was pay full price and you can continue playing it until they shut the servers off never to be turned back on again I would be OK with that. If the game was free to download but required a subscription then that would be OK as well. If it was buy the game and be able to play forever then a cash shop to buy things with real money is acceptable, but if there is a subscription then I cannot accept a cash shop. The subscription pays for the servers and for development of new content. Making players pay for new content they pay for in the subscription should not be acceptable by players.
TesO will not be getting my money because of the blatant money grab of buy the game at full price, subscription, and a cash shop.
You know what they say about assumptions? Also yours is incorrect.Tanis said:You must be new to MMOs.JET1971 said:Paying full price for the game then have a subscription ontop of that is why I will not touch it. So you pay full price to rent the game for 30 days? No thank you. Then have to pay rent every month to continue? Even worse.
If it was pay full price and you can continue playing it until they shut the servers off never to be turned back on again I would be OK with that. If the game was free to download but required a subscription then that would be OK as well. If it was buy the game and be able to play forever then a cash shop to buy things with real money is acceptable, but if there is a subscription then I cannot accept a cash shop. The subscription pays for the servers and for development of new content. Making players pay for new content they pay for in the subscription should not be acceptable by players.
TesO will not be getting my money because of the blatant money grab of buy the game at full price, subscription, and a cash shop.
Thing is the whole 'F2P' model is fairly, well, NEW.
It's not a 'money grab'.
That would be the yearly Cod/Madden games, or most of the mobile F2P market.
Box and subs were the standard for a very long time. And what cash shop? When you have to go into account management to purchase a name change, collector's edition upgrade or bit of that CE with a new skin is that really a cash shop? That's just what Blizzard did for years before they added an actual cash shop. If Zenimax had an in game cash shop I'd agree with you on the cash grab, but they don't. They're not selling cash shop things, and they're not selling it in the game.JET1971 said:Paying full price for the game then have a subscription ontop of that is why I will not touch it. So you pay full price to rent the game for 30 days? No thank you. Then have to pay rent every month to continue? Even worse.
If it was pay full price and you can continue playing it until they shut the servers off never to be turned back on again I would be OK with that. If the game was free to download but required a subscription then that would be OK as well. If it was buy the game and be able to play forever then a cash shop to buy things with real money is acceptable, but if there is a subscription then I cannot accept a cash shop. The subscription pays for the servers and for development of new content. Making players pay for new content they pay for in the subscription should not be acceptable by players.
TesO will not be getting my money because of the blatant money grab of buy the game at full price, subscription, and a cash shop.
Thanks, this is the kind of stuff I want to know.tofulove said:....
[Note: I generally had to pay a deposit on an apartment then monthly rent... so I don't think that is an apt comparison]JET1971 said:You know what they say about assumptions? Also yours is incorrect.Tanis said:You must be new to MMOs.JET1971 said:Paying full price for the game then have a subscription ontop of that is why I will not touch it. So you pay full price to rent the game for 30 days? No thank you. Then have to pay rent every month to continue? Even worse.
If it was pay full price and you can continue playing it until they shut the servers off never to be turned back on again I would be OK with that. If the game was free to download but required a subscription then that would be OK as well. If it was buy the game and be able to play forever then a cash shop to buy things with real money is acceptable, but if there is a subscription then I cannot accept a cash shop. The subscription pays for the servers and for development of new content. Making players pay for new content they pay for in the subscription should not be acceptable by players.
TesO will not be getting my money because of the blatant money grab of buy the game at full price, subscription, and a cash shop.
Thing is the whole 'F2P' model is fairly, well, NEW.
It's not a 'money grab'.
That would be the yearly Cod/Madden games, or most of the mobile F2P market.
I agree with you, and I have never understood people's fear of subscriptions. That's how MMOs started, that's what makes them different. It may not be for everyone, but I think it's still a good option. And your big AAA titles will start that way, EQ, WIldstar, WOW, etc. And yes it is a way for them to make more money maybe, well I guess that's silly for a company to want to make money.Antsh said:[Note: I generally had to pay a deposit on an apartment then monthly rent... so I don't think that is an apt comparison]JET1971 said:You know what they say about assumptions? Also yours is incorrect.Tanis said:You must be new to MMOs.JET1971 said:Paying full price for the game then have a subscription ontop of that is why I will not touch it. So you pay full price to rent the game for 30 days? No thank you. Then have to pay rent every month to continue? Even worse.
If it was pay full price and you can continue playing it until they shut the servers off never to be turned back on again I would be OK with that. If the game was free to download but required a subscription then that would be OK as well. If it was buy the game and be able to play forever then a cash shop to buy things with real money is acceptable, but if there is a subscription then I cannot accept a cash shop. The subscription pays for the servers and for development of new content. Making players pay for new content they pay for in the subscription should not be acceptable by players.
TesO will not be getting my money because of the blatant money grab of buy the game at full price, subscription, and a cash shop.
Thing is the whole 'F2P' model is fairly, well, NEW.
It's not a 'money grab'.
That would be the yearly Cod/Madden games, or most of the mobile F2P market.
Less of a money grab than a lot of those 'F2P' games, many of which can be considered Pay2Win. Doesn't ESO just offer a horse? And there is no in-game ads telling you to go buy something, you have to manually go to their website. WoW (considered the most successful MMO of all time) also has a sub fee and sells mounts and pets.
Having to pay for a game and then a subscription was standard practice around 2009ish and back. I think the purpose of having an upfront price is to initially offset the development costs, which can be significant. And I thought that ESO is
Having a subscription fee gives the devs incentive to make a quality product. May F2P games have to balance between addicting and frustrating to convince players to pay for some type of bonus. You can find information about what these developers call 'whales'(same term used by casinos for suckers) by looking at various talks and workshops at last month's Game Dev Conference. Another thing to note is that companies are hiring people who specialize in 'consumer psychology'. The DSM-V has even added game addiction to a list of possible disorders for future study.
It's gotten to the point that the EU is determine whether or not to add restrictions on companies for using the 'free to play' terminology.
Not saying that all F2Ps are bad, they do still need to make a profit after all. A game like Path of Exile is the perfect example of what I would consider an effective cash shop model. Something like SWTOR switched to an awful model. They severely limited the end-game content, prevented access to your bank for storage, and blocked non-subscribers from using certain items. Not sure if these have been addressed yet, but this was a critical success that lost all credibility by switching to a 'free' model.
I think the main point here is that I would rather companies not attempt to manipulate me into having what is basically an addiction
But, who knows, maybe if ESO becomes F2P it will be done in a consumer friendly way.
Ooh, I have an XKCD for that!JET1971 said:You know what they say about assumptions? Also yours is incorrect.Tanis said:You must be new to MMOs.JET1971 said:Paying full price for the game then have a subscription ontop of that is why I will not touch it. So you pay full price to rent the game for 30 days? No thank you. Then have to pay rent every month to continue? Even worse.
If it was pay full price and you can continue playing it until they shut the servers off never to be turned back on again I would be OK with that. If the game was free to download but required a subscription then that would be OK as well. If it was buy the game and be able to play forever then a cash shop to buy things with real money is acceptable, but if there is a subscription then I cannot accept a cash shop. The subscription pays for the servers and for development of new content. Making players pay for new content they pay for in the subscription should not be acceptable by players.
TesO will not be getting my money because of the blatant money grab of buy the game at full price, subscription, and a cash shop.
Thing is the whole 'F2P' model is fairly, well, NEW.
It's not a 'money grab'.
That would be the yearly Cod/Madden games, or most of the mobile F2P market.