Antarctic Icebergs Caused Huge Sea Level Rise 14,600 Years Ago

MarlaDesat

New member
Aug 22, 2013
733
0
0
Antarctic Icebergs Caused Huge Sea Level Rise 14,600 Years Ago



A new study reports icebergs breaking off Antarctica caused rapid sea level rise 14,600 years ago.

A study published May 28 in the journal Nature reports that the Antarctic icebergs may have caused rapid sea level increases. The researchers identify eight events of increased iceberg numbers from the Antarctic ice sheet, happening between 20,000 and 9,000 years ago. The largest influx of icebergs, which happened 14,600 years ago, resulted in a sea level rise of 6.5 feet over 100 years. The study provides the first direct evidence for historical, significant melting of the Antarctic ice sheet.

Oregan State University climate scientist and study co-author Peter Clark says, "The Antarctic ice sheet had been considered to be fairly stable and kind of boring in how it retreated. This shows the ice sheet is much more dynamic and episodic, and contributes to rapid sea-level rise." The researchers used marine records of iceberg-rafted debris, various objects and sediments embedded in the ice that are deposited after the iceberg melts, to understand changes in Southern Hemisphere ice sheets. This technique has previously been widely used to understand variability in Northern Hemisphere ice sheets.

Antarctica's glaciers have been shrinking since the end of the last great ice age, and the study reports that the last large release of icebergs was 9,000 years ago. Those melting events were caused by natural climate warming. Scientists have pointed to 0.4 inches per year [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/134294-Climate-Change-Worse-Than-We-Predicted-Says-New-Report]. Comparatively, the melting event 14,600 years ago resulted in a rise of approximately 0.8 inches per year over 100 years.

Source: Discovery News [http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature13397.html]

Permalink
 

Baresark

New member
Dec 19, 2010
3,908
0
0
Whoa, you mean ice melted before man came along and dumped excess amounts of carbon into that air! *Head Explodes*
/endsarcasm

This is not actually the first time sudden natural changes have been recorded in earths history, but it's always good to accrue plenty of evidence. There was a recorded temperature increase taken from ice core samples of between 30-50°C in a few decades. That would be catastrophic of course, but in the end it happened under totally natural terms. The natural world is indeed fantastic and terrifying.
 

Kieve

New member
Jan 4, 2011
128
0
0
I wonder if any of these events coincide with significant volcanic or seismic activity. Not that it lets us off the hook for doing our part to try and keep our spinning blue marble healthy, but it's good to be reminded that natural forces are just as capable of making a big mess as our manufactured ones.
 

Barbara Schroeder

New member
May 29, 2014
1
0
0
It would be helpful for the casual reader if the author would clearly state the rapid sea level rise 15,000 years ago occurred because of natural and on-going climate change. Further research into historic sea levels would show sea levels far higher than that also occurring naturally.
It did not matter much when no one inhabited the sea shore but now we build along and love to live on the sea shore.
Honest study and analysis of climate change would likely determine the most efficient way to respond would be to protect the coastline when necessary.
 

Remus

Reprogrammed Spambot
Nov 24, 2012
1,698
0
0
Barbara Schroeder said:
It would be helpful for the casual reader if the author would clearly state the rapid sea level rise 15,000 years ago occurred because of natural and on-going climate change. Further research into historic sea levels would show sea levels far higher than that also occurring naturally.
It did not matter much when no one inhabited the sea shore but now we build along and love to live on the sea shore.
Honest study and analysis of climate change would likely determine the most efficient way to respond would be to protect the coastline when necessary.
Or just not live on it. I personally prefer inland mountains. There's not the constant odor of marine life that gets washed in with the tide, less chance of a catastrophic environmental disaster destroying my home, and there are caves pocketed everywhere to explore and, if needbe, take shelter in when wood and brick just won't do.
 
Aug 31, 2012
1,774
0
0
Kieve said:
I wonder if any of these events coincide with significant volcanic or seismic activity. Not that it lets us off the hook for doing our part to try and keep our spinning blue marble healthy, but it's good to be reminded that natural forces are just as capable of making a big mess as our manufactured ones.
Maybe, but that date was around the beginning of the last interglacial, IIRC the official date for it was about 12000 BP so you'd be expecting to see some melting before that.

Some info:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_age

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glacial_period

...having totally not in anyway just noticed wikipedia has 15,000 BP for the start of the last interglacial I will now, totally on my own, revise my previous date to 15,000BP. (I was probably confusing BP and BC...that's my absolutely true excuse)

Barbara Schroeder said:
It would be helpful for the casual reader if the author would clearly state the rapid sea level rise 15,000 years ago occurred because of natural and on-going climate change.
He could, but it would be a fairly redundant statement for the audience here, at least as far as natural goes, this isn't yahoo news.


EDIT: He does mention it's natural, agree he could have mentioned it's cyclic.

MarlaDesat said:
Those melting events were caused by natural climate warming.
 

Signa

Noisy Lurker
Legacy
Jul 16, 2008
4,749
6
43
Country
USA
It's reports like this that make me a skeptic. Obviously, trying to NOT trash our planet is a good thing, but the whole green thing reeks of the "feel good" movement of the last decade. Until things are more clear, I want to see more levelheadedness about this, and no more carbon hysteria.
 

Olas

Hello!
Dec 24, 2011
3,226
0
0
It's funny that this ten thousand year natural cycle started up right around the time humans started dumping unprecedented amounts of greenhouse gas into the Earth's atmosphere. Oh well, I guess it was all just a coincidence and we're off the hook after all. Drill baby drill.

Nicolaus99 said:
Pff. Must have been all that man made pollution. You know how all those filthy industrialists were back in 12600 BC.
You know, they say that guns can kill you, but people have been dying since long before there were any guns around.
 

likalaruku

New member
Nov 29, 2008
4,290
0
0
Made me think of Bayocean, Oregon. Built in 1917 & wiped off the map in 1952. Would have made a cool ghost town tourist attraction for Tillamook, if not for the whole "being underwater" thing. It seems to be more of a story of storms & construction destabilizing the land, but if melting icecaps had been popular news back then, they probably would have blamed it on that instead.

In case anyone's interested in reading about a 20th century city swimming in Davy Jone's Locker, he's an article: http://www.salem-news.com/articles/january282011/bayocean-ja.php & an old newspaper clipping from when their shore started eroding away: http://wwwhistoricalthreads.blogspot.com/2011/07/life-death-of-bayocean-oregon.html